-
Rick Santorum Pulls the Trifecta
February 8, 2012 | 8 comments
-
Mark Levin on Clint Eastwood
February 7, 2012 | 5 comments
-
Ninth Circuit Court Panel Rules Proposition 8 Unconstitutional
February 7, 2012 | 79 comments
-
Obama Flip-Flops on Super PACs
February 7, 2012 | 1 comment
-
Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Constitution
February 7, 2012 | 16 comments
The Spectacle Blog
Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO), an early Obama supporter in 2008, has issued a statement saying that the White House did not follow the law in removing Gerald Walpin:
The White House has failed to follow the proper procedure in notifying Congress as to the removal of the Inspector General for the Corporation for National and Community Service. The legislation which was passed last year requires that the president give a reason for the removal. ‘Loss of confidence' is not a sufficient reason. I'm hopeful the White House will provide a more substantive rationale, in writing, as quickly as possible.
View all comments (12) | Leave a comment
Leave a Comment
More Blog Posts by W. James Antle, III
http://spectator.org/blog/2009/06/16/democratic-senator-hits-white
Follow us:
ADVERTISEMENT
Current Issue
- Facing Up to Darwin
- The Continuing Crisis
- Herbert Hoover's Long-Awaited Magnum Opus
- Digital Subscription (Save 78%)
- Buy a single issue (Save 50%)
- Send Spectator as a gift
Clip of the Day
ADVERTISEMENT
Pete| 6.16.09 @ 7:05PM
She's going to wake up dead...
Marc| 6.16.09 @ 8:19PM
Dollars to donuts she met with the administration, and/or top DNC officials, before putting out this statement. Reassuring them that she needs to put out this critical statement to make herself look good. to protect her politica future. And she got their ok. Outside of issuing this (pre-approved) statement, she wont be doing anything to right this wrong. She'll sit on her hands, pretending she has done something or tried to and the IG will remain fired.
Angel| 6.16.09 @ 9:33PM
Wow, I thought the Senator deserved some praise for her principled (?) statement, but I guess not.
I didn't know I was such a rube.
John G.| 6.17.09 @ 7:08AM
"Did not follow the law"?
Isn't that the same as breaking the law? The White House broke the law?
Can we expect the Democrats in congress to call for an investigation?
Anyone?
Oldefarte| 6.17.09 @ 11:33AM
You cannot 'follow the law' when you're committing CORRUPTION!!!!
Pingback| 6.17.09 @ 2:08PM
Today’s Tidbits links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pete| 6.17.09 @ 4:28PM
this won't help:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/06/17/democrats-strip-amendments-spending-cut-federal-funding-acorn/
Pingback| 6.17.09 @ 4:29PM
Under the messiah's protection - Page 3 - MightyRighty.com - Conservative News, Disc links to this page. Here’s an excerpt: