When it comes to social media influencers, many might recognize , , , and . But what about the superstar Islamist clerics — Mohamad , A’id , Salman , and Othman — whose track records range from incitement of jihad, country-entry , and displays of bigotry?
Not only do members of the latter group attract more Twitter followers, but their Twitter fan bases are so large that if they were to unite and form a country, it would become the world’s most populous.
To be consistent, Silicon Valley’s biggest companies must either deplatform these “Instagram Islamists,” whose conduct patently violates their community guidelines, or they must entirely abandon these guidelines.
Why does Silicon Valley continue to allow such accounts to exist, especially when four greatest to “ terror” and hate speech? After all, , , , and all prohibit much of the rhetoric employed by these Islamists — anything promoting “violence” or “hate” against others on the basis of their religion or ethnicity.
Today, the Silicon Valley Four stand accused of censoring or conservatives and anti-Islamists accused of , , such as conservative broadcaster , Muslim activist , anti-Islamist writer , and, most recently and notably, . Congressman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) testified a few weeks ago that “Big Tech is out to get conservatives…. That’s a fact.”
Likewise, censorship of anti-Islamist voices has become so bad that, as the Middle East Forum noted two years ago, it appears to “almost weekly.”
To be consistent, Silicon Valley’s biggest companies must either deplatform these “Instagram Islamists,” whose conduct patently violates their community guidelines, or they must entirely abandon these guidelines. Whatever the standard, it should be consistently applied.
The first Islamist deserving of sanction is Mohamad Al Arefe, who has more than 23.4 million followers on , 20 million on , 1.78 million on YouTube, and 450,000 on .
He has been denied entry to , , , and for Britons to “fight in the Middle East,” and for his “” and anti-Shia . Violence consumes Al Arefe, who , “Muslims have no life without jihad,” and has for “jihad in Syria ‘in every possible way.’ ” He sympathizes with , whom he has prayed for in public.
Al Arefe accuses Jews of cowardice and dreams of their cleansing. He , “Whenever the Jews talk about … the wars they have undergone, they are always talking about the ‘massacre of the Jews’ — because they are not men enough to defend themselves… [T]hey talk about the Jewish Holocaust, which they say was carried out by Hitler or whoever…. The Prophet Muhammad said: ‘Judgment day will not come before the Muslims fight the Jews and kill them.’ ”
Al Arefe has also reportedly used social media to “attack liberals, women’s rights, Shi’ite Muslims and homosexuality.” Allegedly, Al Arefe has also that Shiite Muslims “must be killed.’ ”
Does Al Arefe not also deserve to be swiftly deplatformed?
And what about A’id Al Qarnee? A preacher with “a history of inciting jihad against the U.S, Israel, Christians, and Jews,” he has jihad against American soldiers as “a source of pride,” noting that “throats must be slit and skulls shattered.” Further, he declared, “I praise the Jihad, the sacrifice, and the resistance against the occupiers in Iraq.” Al Qarnee also “daily for America’s destruction,” and for Allah to “ the Jews and their helpers from among the Christians and the Communists” and to “turn them into the Muslims’ spoils.”
And what about Salman Al Odeh — a “hate preacher” to whom has denied entry? A , Al Odeh has called for in Afghanistan and Iraq, and has applauded suicide terrorism as a “martyrs’ heroism” to “be rewarded by the gift of 72 virgins.” Promoting or violates YouTube’s guidelines.
Al Odeh has even Bin Laden as his “brother.” Unsurprisingly, Al Odeh’s embraced his father’s radicalism, and in 2003 had to be rescued by Saudi Arabia after rushing “to fight the American invaders” in Iraq.
Al Odeh’s affiliations also warrant concern. He has been described by Yusuf Al Qaradawi — the spiritual leader of the Muslim Brotherhood — as one of his “closest friends.” Al Qaradawi’s fatwas, Arab News , have “justified suicide bombings, violence against all Jews, and the killing of American soldiers, apostates and homosexuals.”
Meanwhile, he characterizes Jews as “betrayers” and “assaulters” in a video accessible on his and , and has even them as the “enemy of Allah.” In 2019, he was also in Kuwait for “stirring up sectarianism” against Shias over YouTube.
Silicon Valley turned a blind eye to these jihadist clerics for a long time. Its double standards towards Islamists and conservatives expose a clear hypocrisy. Big Tech must either embrace an entirely consistent and clearly defined standard for censorship, or it must embrace a new policy of absolute free speech. To retain the trust of the American public, and for the sake of its own interests in the face of increased legislative interest in its biases, tech companies simply cannot refuse to do either.
Jordan Cope is a writer for Islamist Watch, a project of the Middle East Forum.
Notice to Readers: The American Spectator and Spectator World are marks used by independent publishing companies that are not affiliated in any way. If you are looking for The Spectator World please click on the following link: https://spectatorworld.com/.
The offer renews after one year at the regular price of $79.99.