The climate change police have been rounding up the usual suspects this week, and states are starting to pull apart the new EPA regulations that aim to reduce carbon emissions in the U.S.
At most, these plans are expected to reduce global carbon emissions by a grand total of 4 percent by 2020, according to the Wall Street Journal. Experts admit that American efforts will be completely eclipsed by the developing world, but others counter that the ultimate goal of this complex regulatory mountain is to set an example for poorer countries, especially China. Reported the Journal:
“No matter what your view of climate change, these [U.S.] reductions will be dwarfed by increased emissions in other parts of the world,” said Stephen Eule, a vice president at the Institute for 21st Century Energy, part of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
Connie Hedegaard, commissioner for climate action in the European Commission, which sets laws for the 28 countries of the EU, said the Obama administration announcement “is more than symbolic—it is a step that the rest of the world has been waiting for.”
However, the U.S. proposal could spur China to be more aggressive in tackling emissions, she added. “Until now, they could be laid back and say that as long as the U.S. wasn’t moving, why should they? I hope this will inspire China” to act.
I think we should all be good stewards of the earth, and I hope that the United States of America always leads the world in all that is virtuous, lovely, and otherwise noble, but the following seems a bit more relevant to the discussion on China:
With all this in mind, should carbon emissions really be the absolute top diplomatic priority with China?
China is determined to become an economic powerhouse, and its leaders have shown that they will do what is necessary to achieve that goal. They weren’t terribly interested in green technology—until they started selling solar panels to the U.S. Likewise, China will probably decide to curb its carbon emissions when and if its leaders find it economically advantageous. Until then, I question whether this issue is really where we should be putting our resources.
Notice to Readers: The American Spectator and Spectator World are marks used by independent publishing companies that are not affiliated in any way. If you are looking for The Spectator World please click on the following link: https://thespectator.com/world.