One of the most common arguments used in favor of universal health care, specifically government mandates requiring individuals to purchase of health insurance, is that we end up paying for the uninsured the expensive way — when they show up to the emergency room sick or injured. Universal coverage, supporters argue, will reduce the cost of unpaid care.
A recent Belmont Citizen-Herald article included this bit about the Massachusetts universal health care program:
Further down in the story, it says that the $869 million number is “a figure that the governor and legislative leaders acknowledge is too low, perhaps by as much as $200 million.”
So, to save $194 million a year, the state will end up spending over $1 billion. Sounds like par for the course for a government program. And people wonder why, as a conservative, I have issues with Mitt “I like mandates” Romney.
Notice to Readers: The American Spectator and Spectator World are marks used by independent publishing companies that are not affiliated in any way. If you are looking for The Spectator World please click on the following link: https://spectatorworld.com/.