Will and Wilkinson | The American Spectator | USA News and Politics
Will and Wilkinson
by

George Will had championed for the court J. Harvie Wilkinson. He was the judge who let it be known that Bush had questioned him on his exercise schedule. Wilkinson had a careful sensibility and wasn’t an “extremist,” wrote Will, arguing against pure orginalism. So Will’s constitutional jurisprudence is itself a species, albeit it more intelligent than most kinds, of liberal thought. Will’s ideal justice would be neither an originalist nor an outright living-constitution-style activist.Â

Will scores at least one point in his column on Bush’s use of identity politics as a crutch. That can’t be defended. Yesterday Bush at the press conference kept saying that Miers was a female “pioneer” in Texas. So? Does that confer upon her some special insight into the meaning of the Constitution? How can he make the case for justices as apolitical and justify them on representational grounds?

George Neumayr
Follow Their Stories:
View More
George Neumayr, a senior editor at The American Spectator, is author most recently of The Biden Deception: Moderate, Opportunist, or the Democrats' Crypto-Socialist?
Sign Up to receive Our Latest Updates! Register

Notice to Readers: The American Spectator and Spectator World are marks used by independent publishing companies that are not affiliated in any way. If you are looking for The Spectator World please click on the following link: https://thespectator.com/world.

Be a Free Market Loving Patriot. Subscribe Today!