Re: Food For Thought - The American Spectator | USA News and Politics
Re: Food For Thought
by

It seems that Robertson did something savvy: he didn’t oversell on the social issues. Most Republican voters in the primary aren’t going to vote FOR Rudy because of his stance on social issues; they are going to vote for him for other reasons like competence, leadership, terrorism and economics. Robertson’s argument seemed to track this, arguing that Rudy is the best one to go after the Islamic terrorists and that at least Robertson can live with him on social issues because of Rudy’s pledge on judges. Some won’t buy it, some will but if Rudy is nominated social conservatives can certainly claim that he did it with some of their support and not in spite of them.

Sign up to receive our latest updates! Register


By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: The American Spectator, 122 S Royal Street, Alexandria, VA, 22314, http://spectator.org. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact

Be a Free Market Loving Patriot. Subscribe Today!