In light of further evidence, Liz Mair, who was
trying to give Michael Steele the benefit of the doubt, now
concedes, "I really am questioning whether Steele knows what
Steele thinks about abortion." Meanwhile, Andrew Sullivan
notes that the GQ interview, in which Steele seems
open to the idea of civil unions, closely coincided with the time
he went on Mike Gallagher and suggested it would be "crazy" for
Republicans to consider supporting civil unions. (Sullivan says
that both interviews were conducted on the same day, but the GQ
interview was conducted over a period in late February/early
March, according to a magazine spokesman, and the Gallagher
interview was on
the 23rd). Either way, it doesn't change the point that he
seems to be catering his position to the audience.
But the important thing to keep in mind about this diversion is
that it shouldn't really matter at this point what Michael
Steele's personal views are -- he's there to represent the party
and its platform, not himself. When Robert Gibbs gives a press
briefing, he isn't offering his own opinions, but conveying the
thinking of the administration. That's why I'm starting to wonder
if all of the hoopla surrounding this year's RNC chairman's race
has actually backfired. At the time, there was a lot of talk
about how "open" the typically behind the scenes process had
become. Candidates actively engaged blogs and there was even a
debate among the candidates, in which they were asked for their
views on a wide range of issues. But I wonder if, in the end, it
turned the race into more of a personality contest. To the
candidates, it became all about them. And Steele emerged
the victor out of this process with the mindset of somebody who
had just been elected to political office. In his post-election
news conference, a haughty Steele even taunted Obama by asking,
"How do you like me now?" So, it's in some ways understandable
that he thinks he's the conquering hero and the RNC members
actually want him to go around spouting his personal opinions on
everything.
Steele-Gate further explored « Political Byline Powered By Search Site and Internet @import url(http://www.google.com/cse/api/branding.css); Custom Search I support the resistance View my page on The Patriotic Resistance friends Spam Blocked 6,000…
Maybe we should allow Mr. Steele the same pleasure that has been
the hallmark of Mr. Obama! Teleprompters where ever you go so
that all you have to do is know ahead of time what is going to be
asked and just read the answer. I think that as a party it is
time that we begin to stand behind those elected and selected for
jobs within the party and stop always agreeing with the left.
That is one thing that you seldom see no matter how far out the
individual is the dems stand behind the person.
…perhaps that the “open,” candidate-centered campaign for chairman manufactured Steele’s present predicament by creating the perception that the candidates’ opinions actually mattered, Phil Klein writes, “ in the end, it turned the race into more of a personality contest.” The premature calls for the forcible ejection of the first African American chairman of the RNC – like those by the AFA’s…
Pingback| 3.12.09 @ 3:20PM
Did the "Open" RNC Chair Race Backfire? — But As For Me links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
kingfish| 3.12.09 @ 4:53PM
just one problem. Most of the prominent conservative blogs did NOT support Steele.
Booker| 3.12.09 @ 5:21PM
He's a disaster, an unhinged egomanica.
Pingback| 3.12.09 @ 6:00PM
Steele-Gate further explored « Political Byline links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pkane| 3.12.09 @ 8:58PM
Its even more pathetic that the RNC can't find competent leadership when you consider their counterparts:
https://www.democrats.org/page/contribute/billboardwinner
Gary| 3.13.09 @ 7:53AM
Maybe we should allow Mr. Steele the same pleasure that has been the hallmark of Mr. Obama! Teleprompters where ever you go so that all you have to do is know ahead of time what is going to be asked and just read the answer. I think that as a party it is time that we begin to stand behind those elected and selected for jobs within the party and stop always agreeing with the left. That is one thing that you seldom see no matter how far out the individual is the dems stand behind the person.
Pingback| 3.14.09 @ 8:18PM
The Skepticians » Blog Archive » AFA Wants Steele’s Head links to this page. Here’s an excerpt: