The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
The Largest Selection of Liberal-baiting Merchandise on the Net!
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email

Campaign Crawlers

Life Lynched

Believe it or not, the late Ted Kennedy's Senate seat was once held by a pro-life Democrat. Even more remarkably, that pro-life Democrat was Kennedy himself. Asked in 1971 what he thought of the nascent campaign to legalize abortion, Kennedy memorably responded that "abortion on demand is not in accordance with the value which our society places on human life."

"Wanted or unwanted," Kennedy continued, "I believe that human life, even at its earliest stages, has certain rights which must be recognized -- the right to be born, the right to love, the right to grow old." These words ended up being valuable only to political historians chronicling the decline of the pro-life Democrat. Within two years, Roe v. Wade was decided, abortion was a national political issue, and Kennedy hewed to liberalism's pro-choice party line.

Kennedy's Senate seat won't be filled by a pro-life Democrat after the special election to fill the vacancy caused by his death. Congressman Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.) of South Boston announced yesterday that he was taking a pass on the race. The leading Democrats still considering a Senate run are all pro-choice, as are most Massachusetts voters according to polls taken in the nation's second most Catholic state.

Most of the stories commenting on Lynch's surprising decision not to run -- he was expected to make his candidacy official today -- have focused on his failure to win sufficient union backing. A former ironworker and traditional blue-collar Democrat, Lynch had expected the unions to provide the institutional support and elbow grease he needed to win. But Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley, the Democratic frontrunner, won the endorsement of the Teamsters Local 25.

A senior Lynch adviser told the Boston Globe that "support from organized labor was not materializing." A second adviser was quoted by the Globe as saying, "He realized the parts weren't there to win." Lynch implied as much himself when he said in a statement that the "challenge of putting together the resources and organization necessary to wage a competitive statewide campaign in less than 90 days is insurmountable."

Less remarked upon was why overwhelming union support was so essential -- the fact that Lynch wasn't going to get much help from other liberal interest groups in the commonwealth and around the country. He was slow to back gun control, though he received a grade of "F" from the National Rifle Association, and took a little too long for liberals' comfort to see the wisdom of his party's stand on gay rights. He voted to authorize the war in Iraq and was the only member of the Massachusetts House delegation to vote in favor of a 2006 Republican resolution opposing "an arbitrary date for the withdrawal or redeployment" of U.S. troops.

Yet the biggest issue separating Lynch from the left wing of his party is abortion. He has described himself as pro-life since he served in the Massachusetts legislature. When he entered the race to fill the late Congressman Joe Moakley's House seat in 2001, Lynch was pilloried for his abortion views by all his Democratic primary opponents -- including two who had flipped from pro-life to pro-choice themselves.

"Unlike some people, I'm not sure precisely when life begins, or whether a fetus is a legal person," Lynch conceded to liberal newspaper columnist Thomas Oliphant. "But I believe strongly that this is at least the potential of human life and that it is the most special and precious gift, and must be protected." For this measured description of his abortion views, Oliphant dubbed Lynch a "committed opponent of abortion rights as they currently exist in this country."

Republicans also tried to use abortion against Lynch. In a Hail Mary attempt to win in an overwhelmingly Democratic district, the GOP nominated Joanne Sprague, a socially liberal Republican state senator who described herself as a "pro-choice woman who believes that opposition to civil unions for gays is un-American." Columnist Eileen McNamara predicted, "Sprague could attract more liberal voters and pull off a win reminiscent of Republican William Weld's victory over Democrat John Silber in the governor's race a decade ago."

The Eileen McNamaras were wrong. Lynch was able to win the Democratic primary and then crush Sprague in the general election for two reasons: His geographic base in the district wasn't turned off by cultural conservatism and his recently deceased predecessor, Joe Moakley, remained a committed opponent of abortion long after Ted Kennedy had flipped.

Once in Congress, Lynch voted to ban partial-birth abortion. He supported continued funding of health providers that refuse to provide abortion referrals or information. Lynch voted to recognize unborn children as victims in crimes against pregnant women and to restrict interstate transport of minors to help them get abortions in contravention of other states' parental-involvement laws.

Even on abortion, though, Lynch has tried to move left to please his party bosses. Like many pro-life Democrats in the Harry Reid mold, Lynch has become more of a Democrat than a pro-lifer. He opposed the National Right to Life Committee on every vote in 2007-08 after supporting them 64 percent of the time as recently as 2002-03. He voted with NARAL Pro-Choice America 100 percent of the time in 2007 after earning a zero rating from them just the year before. Lynch consistently votes against pro-lifers on expanded federal funding of embryo-destructive stem-cell research.

Steve Lynch is nevertheless out of the Massachusetts Senate race while Congressman Michael Capuano, one of the Democrats who pounded pro-life former Boston Mayor Ray Flynn on abortion to win Joe Kennedy's House seat in 1998, is still pondering a run. "As a pro-life legislator I have always tried to show complete respect for those who hold different views," Lynch said meekly back in 2001. "I just hope that others will show the same respect for me."

Fat chance.

Letter to the Editor

topics:
Abortion, Ted Kennedy

W. James Antle, III is associate editor of The American Spectator.

Comments

Pingback| 9.16.09 @ 9:13AM

Twitter Trackbacks for The American Spectator : Life Lynched [spectator.org] on Tops links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…Philip Klein amspec American Spectator 110 Show more Shortened Links Linking to the spectator.org page http://bit.ly/9kdrm info http://ow.ly/pBNe http://bit.ly/aSoId info   3 tweets Tweet The American Spectator : Life Lynched spectator.org/archives/2009/09/16/life-lynched – view page – cached Believe it or not, the late Ted Kennedy's Senate seat was once held by a pro-life Democrat. Even more remarkably,…

S.L. Toddard| 9.16.09 @ 1:57PM

Mr. Antle, I wish you would give your opinion on the candidacies of Peter Schiff and Rand Paul, esp vis a vis whether you consider a return to their brand of conservatism possible for the GOP, and whether you would welcome such a transformation .

Liberal Reader| 9.16.09 @ 3:57PM

As a pro-life Democrat, I'm here to affirm things aren't easy for us.

However, we do not abandon our party, with whom we disagree on one issue, to join a party that is wrong about almost everything else.

I'm not at all certain, anyway, about what Republicans are willing to DO about the abortion issue.

In my lifetime, I have seen Republicans wage public battles to amend the Constitution to ban gay marriage and flag burning, but I don't remember any concerted effort for an amendment on abortion.

When has a Republican EVER risked anything for this issue?

Alan Brooks| 9.16.09 @ 8:28PM

Abortion is 'genocide', as future generations (incl taxpayers) are wiped out.
Frankly, though, men want to kill more than anything else, so if they weren't killing babies, they would be killing more adults.
Am I optimistic? only concerning pure science.

KyMouse| 9.17.09 @ 9:23AM

"Unlike some people, I'm not sure precisely when life begins, or whether a fetus is a legal person," Lynch conceded to liberal newspaper columnist Thomas Oliphant.

That old canard -- "we just don't know when a new human life begins; its a matter of personal faith." I have in front of me a standard textbook on clinically oriented embryology (The Developing Human), written for medical students. It very clearly states as the definition of "zygote": "This cell results from fertilization of an ovum by a sperm. A zygote is the beginning of a new human being."

For the sake of argument, however, let's pretend that science hasn't figured out that development and growth in organic creatures proves that they are alive. If no one knew when a distinct human being comes into existence, wouldn't that actually be a good reason to make abortion illegal? If we're not sure that unborn babies are living human beings, don't the mothers aborting them risk sentencing human beings to death?

Before buildings are imploded, everyone makes sure that no people are inside or nearby. Anyone who claims that it's all right to abort a baby because no one knows when life begins is like a structural engineer who thinks it's okay to implode a building before making sure that no one is in it. During the first days after 9/11, workers clearing the wreckage at the World Trade Center used their hands and buckets, not bulldozers, because there was the possibility that there could be living human beings underneath.

womens uggs boots| 9.21.09 @ 1:23PM

womens uggs boots
uggs australia boots

Stamd| 11.19.09 @ 2:22AM

Video Cutter|iTouch Converter for Mac

Leave a Comment

Related Articles

ADVERTISEMENT

The Threat to Medical Innovation

Philip Klein

* * * *

Get That Hacker a Pimp Coat

Paul Chesser

* * * *

Justice Dep't Recusal List!

Quin Hillyer

* * * *

The Ben Nelson Shuffle

W. James Antle, III

* * * *

AHIP Opposes Senate Health Bill

Philip Klein

* * * *

Moment of Truth

W. James Antle, III

* * * *

No Sales Days in the Afghan War

George H. Wittman

* * * *

Bureaucrats With Badges

Mark Hyman

* * * *

Obama in Wonderland

Ken Blackwell

* * * *

A Writer Speaks

William Tucker

* * * *

What Has Changed?

Robert P. Kirchhoefer

* * * *

High Stakes

Manon McKinnon

* * * *
ADVERTISEMENT