-
A Lebanese Charm Offensive
January 12, 2013 | 12 comments
-
Softness at the NSC
November 26, 2012 | 20 comments
-
Anti-Business as Usual
June 20, 2011 | 62 comments
-
National Public Internet
June 14, 2011 | 31 comments
-
This Property Is Condemned
June 13, 2011 | 25 comments
Washington Prowler
Flyover Launcher
Who was on board Air Force One over New York? And who is Louis Caldera?
This morning, at least one news organization and one citizen advocacy group was mulling filing a Freedom of Information Act request seeking the release of the manifest for the Air Force One New York flyover to determine if any Obama donors or other interested parties were on board the flight.
The suspicion that civilians — or a high-ranking White House official — may have been on the flight is the result, in part, of the involvement of Louis Caldera, the Obama Administration’s director of the White House Military Office, who authorized the New York City flyover, and who was brought into the administration, say Obama donors and transition team members, for his understanding of the Pentagon’s inner-workings, his relationship with high-powered donors with backgrounds in the defense industry, and his ties to both Bill and Hillary Clinton and New Mexico governor Bill Richardson.
“He’s a fixer in the classic sense of the term, and I wouldn’t be surprised if there is more to the flyover story than we know,” says one former Obama defense transition team member. “He would not have been my first choice to put in that position given his background, but it wasn’t my decision. The fact that he is in that position raises questions of judgment on the part of [chief of staff Rahm] Emanuel, I think.”
Caldera served for two years as Bill Clinton’s Secretary of the Army, and back then was tasked, according to former Clinton insiders, with identifying “politically friendly” military personnel who would be helpful to the Clintons, as well as interacting with VIPs from Hollywood and the defense industry to keep them happy. During Caldera’s tenure at the Pentagon, his choice to serve as deputy inspector general, Maj. Gen. Larry G. Smith, was scuttled after it was revealed that an alleged sexual harassment complaint against him had been removed from his personnel record.
Caldera, who served in the California state assembly, also served as a vice chancellor of the California state university system. It was this background that allowed Gov. Bill Richardson to press for Caldera to be brought on as the president of the University of New Mexico. Caldera was not considered a top tier candidate for that post until Richardson’s staff inserted a job requirement that the president be required to have a top security clearance. According to former Clinton administration sources, that job requirement almost ensured the only qualified candidate would be Richardson’s friend, Caldera. Almost 80 percent of the faculty of University of New Mexico voted against the hiring of Caldera, but Richardson and the school’s board of regents overruled the faculty’s input.
Caldera’s controversial background doesn’t end there. In 2002, Caldera was placed on the board of IndyMac, before its failure and placement in receivership due to its poor capitalization as a result of poor mortgage investments, IndyMac Bank was the largest savings and loan in Southern California and seventh largest mortgage originator in the United States.
According to White House sources, while Caldera has apologized, and Rahm Emanuel’s office has launched an “investigation” into the use of Air Force One for publicity purposes and a low flyover, the investigation’s instigation began in the White House Counsel’s Office, run by Gregory Craig.
The White House is already on record as saying that only Air Force personnel were on Air Force One. Yesterday, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs told reporters: “I’m told that — keep in mind this was a — this was two training missions that, in the end, became a picture mission, which the President having quite clearly called today a mistake and one that he will ensure doesn’t happen again. Because this was a training mission, the only people on that plane were Air Force personnel.”
But there are suspicions there is more to it. “This is a bigger deal than the White House is letting on, and there are some nervous people there, and I’m not clear why,” says the former transition team member. “If I were still advising them, I’d say live up to the transparency pledge and release all the documents. But from the get-go, this was a top secret operation, which raises a whole bunch of red flags.”
Kitty| 4.29.09 @ 11:38AM
Read Clarice Feldman's "Fly By Farce Theory" in American Thinker:
"JOM poster Mustang has a plausible theory on the fly-by over Manhattan yesterday: that it was to aid in the production of a film Red Tail about the Tuskegee Airman called Red Tail. Tom Maguire details it:..."
It's not terribly far fetched, considering George Lucas' contributions:
http://www.newsmeat.com/fec/bystate_detail.php?st=CA&last=lucas&first=george
...
Appleby| 4.29.09 @ 12:08PM
My thought is that Michelle and the kids, plus a few selected kiddie friends, were joy-riding. Don't try to make this more complicated than need be; remember we're talking about the First Brat here, Mr. "I Won [neener neener neener]" -- and think about it.
Dustoff| 4.29.09 @ 12:16PM
I find it odd. Obama disses the CEO's for using their planes and wasting money. Now he pulls the same stunt and I wonder who in the heck is going to pay this 300.000+ stunt
sinanju| 4.29.09 @ 12:38PM
I'm with Kitty on this one. The photos from the ground clearly show the distinctive red tail of the 187th Fighter Group of the Alabama Air National Guard, the spiritual heirs of the 99th Fighter Squadron. George Lucas has given generously to all the right people over the years and a shot of the descendants of the Tuskeegee Airman proudly escorting a black president against the backdrop of Manhattan would make a stirring clip to be played for the closing credits.
I can't wait to watch as this unfolds and the facts are pried out one-by-one. It's the small but indicative scandals like this that really resonate with us peasants.
Pete| 4.29.09 @ 12:39PM
Look in the mirror...that's who is paying for it. Where's the outrage in the MSM?
Pingback| 4.29.09 @ 12:42PM
Air Force One buzzes Lower Manhattan - Page 32 - Political Forum links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
sinanju| 4.29.09 @ 12:43PM
Apropos of Air Force One. Does anyone remember Bill Clinton's infamous haircut? Not so much for the Beverly hairstylist's fee but the fact that it took place on Air Force One while tying up a major runway at LAX for over an hour. Sooner or later, Obama's soaring rhetoric will no longer be able to be squared with his squalid actions in the adoring public's mind.
Dave Matthews, your opinion please?
KyMouse| 4.29.09 @ 12:52PM
If I understand this correctly, AF1 was wheeling low over Manhattan for some minutes. In my city, large aircraft that are approaching or departing from the main airport -- in other words, are low -- aren't usually allowed to fly over downtown, in case something goes terribly wrong and the aircraft crashes into a high concentration of people. Seems to me that flying a plane that big around Manhattan for a while risked such a catastrophe.
Danielle| 4.29.09 @ 1:12PM
Looks like we have one more thing to add to his list of indiscretions. I found this video with a lot of info on the flyover- http://www.newsy.com/videos/flyover_triggers_9_11_flashback/- and I thought the quotes from people calling for his resignation were really appropriate. Who would make such a stupid decision? He embarrassed the White House with this one.
Tim| 4.29.09 @ 1:17PM
Clinton had the Lincoln Bedroom scandal, you're insinuating that Obama actually topped this with his Air Force Fun thrill ride?
Aaron| 4.29.09 @ 1:18PM
In due time, some one will talk. Its not a matter of if but when. My question is when will the "O" people re-brand the planes? They are all about the branding and marketing of things and its been a while since Jackie put her stamp on it.
The statement will be along the lines that the U.S. is too flashy and intimidating, its time to "remake" the image.
Anthony| 4.29.09 @ 2:11PM
Somebody needs to file an FOI complaint because the MSM is not interested. If this was Bush, the WHPC would have raked the chubby pinanata, Scott McClellen, so over the coals until all names of passengers were released. Oh, and of course, Henry Swine flu Waxman would be holding hearings.
Pingback| 4.29.09 @ 2:27PM
911 Cult Strikes Again - Air Force One Terrorizes NY - Page 6 - Grasscity.com Forums links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
L. Ross| 4.29.09 @ 2:44PM
People, I'm an Air Force pilot. I've flown 747s. I've done mid-air refueling in support of presidential visits. Trust me, while this photo op wasn't cheap, it is absolute peanuts compared to the cost of any president's trips overseas, or even here in the States. Iconic images, and even great art doesn't come cheap. Let's face it, Air Force One flying low over the Statue of Liberty is an iconic image. They might have wanted one that doesn't have the World Trade Center in the background. Just as a supposition.
Regarding the danger to the general population, trust me, AF1 is probably the best maintained jet on the planet. All due dilligence would have been taken to ensure no conflicts with other traffic in the area. Finally, the jet would have been a minimum of 2000' above the water for the flyby. If they had lost all their engines to some freak flock of birds (vastly less likely, given the greater size and reliability vs those of that recent US Airways ditching) they could still have glided about 6 miles from that height, enough to pick your ditching location, perhaps even land at La Guardia.
Finally, I hope that the plane was filled with people. Hopefully the airmen of Andrews AFB were allowed a once in a lifetime chance to fly on a high flying piece of history. But it was probably a bunch of damn Obama donors...
Stoutcat | 4.29.09 @ 2:44PM
Yesterday, Grand Rants filed two FOIA requests for information on the flight manifest, plan, and passenger list. Wonder if we'll actually get them in a readable condition... and when.
clarice r feldman| 4.29.09 @ 2:55PM
Other JOM posters are making a plausible argument that the movie behind the joyride on the Hudson was angelina jolie's "Salt" now in production in NYC and Washington D.C>
In any event given everything it is far more plausible that this was connected to the filming of a movie than it was to getting still shots for souvenirs in the WH gift shop (the most recent WH explanation).
Pingback| 4.29.09 @ 3:11PM
Video: 9/11 or 4/27? » The Foundry links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Dustoff| 4.29.09 @ 3:17PM
L. Ross
Sorry sir, but this was a stupid stunt that not only scared the heck out people in NY. It was also a waste of taxpayers money. Might I remind you when Obama went after the CEO's and their jets.
Obama can't have it both ways.
Tim| 4.29.09 @ 3:43PM
Strange to say maybe, but any movie producer is going to create that shot on a computer where all the variables can be controlled and the image manipulated. Studios can't waste money on the things they can computer animate, unless they are getting it free.
DisturbedMary| 4.29.09 @ 3:50PM
Send the pitchfork people over to the White House.
clarice| 4.29.09 @ 4:01PM
Tim, are you suggesting that the WH gift shop couldn't have used the same techniques?
HEH.
clarice| 4.29.09 @ 5:14PM
Jack Kemp (not the politician) was on the Staten Island ferry on Sunday before the joyride down the Hudson, a say when the ferry was full of people and says that a red helicopter hovered overhead and took pictures of it. It might well be that it was connected with the next day's fly by.
Michael Tomlinson| 4.29.09 @ 5:26PM
Thank God the recent "terror scare" in NYC was just another BO screw up. The next time it will be the real deal thanks to the Obama administration's policies of appeasement. Jihad is alive and growing in boldness thanks to the faux male now living at 1600 Penn Ave.
WilliamInWien| 4.29.09 @ 5:28PM
Shortly before the 747 flyover, a civilian AC got lost and violated DC airspace causing some serious responses in Congress and the WH. Since these two 747s are the main means to evacuate the POTUS in case of a terrorist-sorry can't use that term-man made disaster in the making, would not the WH not know where the evac -aircraft are at ALL TIMES? Location, availability, maintenance schedule, etc? I hope this enitre fiasco unravels and we get the facts. Mr. Ross, Aircraft recognition capability might not have been the first thought of those on the ground peering upward toward an oncoming airliner. The F-16s, to those on the ground, might have been (a) providing escort or (b) prepared to shoot it down.
Ralph Averill| 4.29.09 @ 5:32PM
This is the best conservatives can do? See if anybody's pals took a ride over the Big Apple in Air Force 1? OOOOH! Ya got' em now! What a sin! What if some of the flight crew brought their kids? Ya gonna drum 'em out of the service? Conservative Republicans become more pathetic, every day, in every way.
Gene MCM| 4.29.09 @ 5:32PM
Following my personal guide of believing nothing I hear and only twenty five percent of what I see, and being by nature suspicious, it occurs to me that this was a carefully disguised test of the New York response system, which failed miserbly. If I believe reports, the FAA knew about the flight; a flight plan was filed; supposedly New york City's Emergency Management Center was asleep at the switch. I also wonder at the speed at shich nes of the flight spread: are we to believe all the workers in New York are glued to windows searching for Armageddon II, rather than being gainfully employed? Some how the "news" of the flyover spread like wildfire. To me, this is the critical piece of data.
T. Knight| 4.29.09 @ 5:36PM
Hey, L. Ross! Are you defending this stupid "flyover"? If you are, you're as stupid as they are. Maybe you should resign your commission right now. You're unfit to wear the unform of the American military.
Good Captain| 4.29.09 @ 5:45PM
One commenter wanted to know where the MSM's rage was. The answer is that their rage would certainly be directed at those taking umbrage; certainly not at the One.
Timbo| 4.29.09 @ 5:53PM
We'll see the flight manifest right after we see the birth certificate. Never.
Con| 4.29.09 @ 5:57PM
Obama said he knew this happened the same time we did. BULL! How stupid does he think we are?
He has to approve everything before it can be done. He put his O.K. on this stupid trip thru
N.Y, knowing very well it would scare the crap
out of everyone who saw those planes heading for the buildings. This was a well planned event.
Stupid, but well planned. No one can take off with
Obamas plane without his approval. NO ONE!
Lucius Vorenus| 4.29.09 @ 5:57PM
Gene MCM: Following my personal guide of believing nothing I hear and only twenty five percent of what I see, and being by nature suspicious, it occurs to me that this was a carefully disguised test of the New York response system, which failed miserbly.
I found myself hoping that someone had installed a battery of anti-aircraft missiles in NYC, and that as AF1 swooped down low over the Hudson, the radar would have gone hot, the missiles would have auto-fired, and the damn plane would have been shot right out of the sky.
Oh well, one can dream...
PapayaSF| 4.29.09 @ 6:14PM
There are several things that don't make sense about this. 1) If you need pictures of Air Force One, why would you take them from a single-seat F-16? Did they find a pilot who was also a pro photographer and who could fly with one hand and hold the camera with the other? 2) Why was the F-16 behind the other plane in all the footage I saw? Wouldn't you want pictures from the side or the front?
Marc Jeric| 4.29.09 @ 6:18PM
We have here another believer in Abu Hussein from Kenya - Ralph Averill - infecting these pages by his garbage. We must know which far-left donors were given a chance to fly Air Force One. Anybody remembers those expensive Lincoln bedroom sleepovers? $100,000 a night? AF One flyover was probably at least as much; but then Ivy university tuitions for our Community Organizer-in-Chief's daughters will be very expensive.
Jane| 4.29.09 @ 7:13PM
BO needs to look into the camera, instead of a tele-prompter and apoligise for this fly-over. We will never find out the truth about this tax-payer waste...We cannot even find out where this guy was born!!
Dave| 4.29.09 @ 8:41PM
Deception is always a great tool to advance agendas or cover-up truths. And I guess we are still supposed to believe the Warren Commission regarding Kennedy? I guess Washington elites still believe that Americans are thumb-sucking, American Idol and Dancing with the Stars dunces. The Elites of Washington continue to elevate themselves into absurity. Another jab to the face of real Americans - and sadly, we will never see the truth about this latest 'absudity' - and we'll never see the 'transparency' of truth on this one. Be ware of snake charmers! Certainly, one and one isn't adding up to 2 - at all, unless you are a politician and you own the snakes.
Cow Rie| 4.29.09 @ 8:59PM
A note to Ralph, no, we don't think we "got" Obama. What we do have is arrogant dripping hypocrisy is missed by those brillant open minded libs. And yes Ralph, this is just one SMALL example of it. Welcome to the World of the Left.
Roscoe| 4.29.09 @ 9:17PM
"...getting still shots for souvenirs in the WH gift shop (the most recent WH explanation)."....
The empty suit must be expecting some more visits to/from Heads of State ...
Michael| 4.29.09 @ 10:18PM
The White House is lying about why this flyover happened. It was to get a photo of Air Force One with an F-16 with a red tail (commemorating the Tuskegee Airmen). The F-16 was from the 187th Fighter Wing Alabama Air National Guard. The following link is for the 187th http://www.almont.ang.af.mil/ As you will notice, there is a picture of the WWII P-51 Mustang (with a red tail) and a 187th F-16 with a red tail. Just like the one that flew over NY City. It all has to do with African-American flyers in WWII and our first African-American president.
Here is some background on the Tuskegee Airmen.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuskegee_airmen
From the Wikipedia article on the Tuskegee airmen:
On December 9, 2008, the remaining Tuskegee Airmen were invited to attend the inauguration of Barack Obama, the first African-American elected President. Retired Lt. William Broadwater, 82, of Upper Marlboro, a Tuskegee Airman, summed up the feeling. "The culmination of our efforts and others' was this great prize we were given on Nov. 4. Now we feel like we've completed our mission." More than 180 airmen attended the January 20, 2009 inauguration.
It would appear that this (the flyover) was supposed to be Barack Obama's "mission accomplished" photo op.
They (the White House) lied. And the press wimped out.
The MSM is dying. There is no one in the MSM with either the spine or the smarts to ask the correct questions of the White House. The MSM will die on its knees like the cowards they are.
As you sow, so shall ye reap.
They don't deserve to survive.
clarice| 4.29.09 @ 10:34PM
Papaya, If this was a photo shoot wouldn't you have the same question--where were the cameras? If this was for a movie, the chase would be the thing and would be filmed from many angles--boats in the water, tall buildings nearby and maybe even some shots from AF 2.
ds80| 4.29.09 @ 11:09PM
Hey, it's Mr Ralph Averill, with his fresh new membership as a Copperhead!
"Conservative Republican" is an oxymoron.
For you, sir, there is no "oxy".
Pingback| 4.29.09 @ 11:40PM
Video: 9/11 or 4/27? | But As For Me links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
tom| 4.30.09 @ 1:03AM
Forget the $$$
Think of all those poor people in NY who were in a panic when they saw the plane!
I was watching Fox and they had someone calling 911 who was in tears and in a panic about this.
Plus all the footage with people running/panicking.
The GOP needs to call for investigations about this.
The White House needs to fire people for this.
The attorney General needs to bring criminal charges against who was responsible.
PapayaSF| 4.30.09 @ 1:57AM
Clarice: Yes, that's my question. If the photo op is AF1+Manhattan, you need a camera in the air, yet the only place for it was the F-16, which is not really suitable for taking high-quality pictures of other aircraft, and which was in the wrong place most (if not all) of the time. If it was for a movie, there would usually be many cameras all over the place. So neither the White House explanation nor the movie explanation makes sense.
BPT (Australia) | 4.30.09 @ 3:56AM
You raise some sharp questions. Here’s another: How did the photos work out?
Pingback| 4.30.09 @ 4:30AM
Video: 9/11 or 4/27? | emmanuel saez links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Crusader| 4.30.09 @ 9:11AM
L.Ross, I'm an AF comm guy. I coulda had "iconic images" of AF1 by the statue of liberty in about 10 minutes. Its called "Photoshop."
I woulda only charged $150K, less than half of what this flight cost. Woulda thrown in iconic images of AF1 flying over the Grand Canyon for free, too.
HMichaelH| 4.30.09 @ 9:47AM
Why are they just, "...mulling filing a Freedom of Information Act request?" Why not just DO IT?
If I knew how to do it, myself, I'd file a request today.
William Rogers| 4.30.09 @ 11:01AM
If this was a photo-op where was the photographer? The news accounts so far have mentioned only three airplanes - one of the president's 747's and two F-16's. The F-16 is not a photography platform. Professional photography requires a specially modified airplane. Was there such an airplane in the area? If so let's see the photographs for we paid so much to produce.
clarice| 4.30.09 @ 12:32PM
Papaya, Manhattan's huge with photogrphers regularly all over the place. If there were cameras on the rooftops of those buildings and in AF2 and on boats in the Hudson, who'd know?
In any event I have asked the AF liaison office about this and am awaiting a reply.
clarice| 4.30.09 @ 2:34PM
Ir may well not have been for a movie. If it was for a movie, it was not handled thru normal (AF liaison office) channels. This is the response I got to my inquiry yesterday of that office:
"Please be advised that this office had no involvement with the fighter escort of AF2 down the Hudson. This was a White House coordinated effort. As a courtesy, I have provided the URL for the press release on this matter. You should direct your inquiries to the White House press office. Thanks.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Statement-from-Louis-Caldera-Director-White-House-Military-Office-on-Air-Force-One-flight-over-New-York/"
Pingback| 4.30.09 @ 3:56PM
No. | Social Debate: Barack and American Politics links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Garrett| 4.30.09 @ 9:20PM
It was dignitaries from the Islamic world who were simulating 9-11 in a mocking, laughing manner, flaunting their newfound relationship with the gullible compatriot in the White House. They got permission from a deferential Obama or someone close to him - Emanuel, etc.
old1| 5.1.09 @ 1:22AM
AF1 doesn't do tricks over New York unless the President, ordered it, knows about it, or has appointed another idiot, who was in charge of this stupid event. Anyway he should have known about it. We don't know if he is really the President, being born a Brit, and not being Natural Born. But he sets in the Oval office, so we do know this, It's his responsibility! He's to blame! Can't be anyone else, unless incompetence is an excuse.
chowder| 5.1.09 @ 3:38PM
Ralph Averill,
Your double standard is so thick, I can chew it. You and the lib cronies would have been having strokes over this had it been Bush. Get over your pretentious self.
Ostrich| 5.1.09 @ 5:57PM
Here's a thought. If they really wanted a photo op or movie clip of Air Force 1 along the NYC skyline, could they not just Photoshop it? I bet I could do that with archive photos, and it would only cost me a few cents. Get the Mac guy from the commercials to make a movie on iMovie, which comes free with any new Mac. How would anyone really know?
So, yeah, this smells like a cover-up, which if they would just let us know now, it will be somewhat embarrassing. But if they make us work to find it after a long period of time, than it's going to fester.
Pingback| 5.1.09 @ 8:41PM
Just WHO was on that barnstorming New York flyover plane? links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Kelley | 5.2.09 @ 10:45PM
Go scan the news stories for Michelle Obama. There are lots of them. But there is not a single story for her regarding her activities on
Apr. 27, when Air Farce One buzzed Ground Zero.
The plane's flight pattern puts the lie to the photo op, because the plane swooped low over lower Manhattan....a totaly unnecessary and
unprofessional thing to do, traumatizing thosands of New Yorkers.
This means the plane was there for some other reason. It makes no sense that the plane would have been empty, as there would be zero
reason for the plane to pass over the area at 1,000 feet.
So the plane had passengers. Who were the passengers? Barack was probably at the White House. But where was Michelle?
And who is it that Barack can't say no to AND who could take a presidential limo to AAFB where the planes are kept, thereby getting access to the planes?
There is only one person who fits that description. Michelle Obama? Did she take George Soros for a ride to pay off the massive debt the Obamas owe him for running the scandalous fundraising operation?
The plane was not empty. Someone damn important was on the plane. Who was it? If Michelle had not been on the plane, the personnel at AAFB could have easily said, "You are not authorized to get on this plane."
But Michelle is authorized, or at least she could pull rank.
If Barack was at the White House, Michelle was the passenger.
Pingback| 5.5.09 @ 1:34PM
White House Not Releasing Scare Force One Photos « Nice Deb links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 5.7.09 @ 4:06AM
Canine tooth » Blog Archive » Abdullah Kamel Abdullah Kamel Al Kandari links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Essie Em| 5.8.09 @ 11:00PM
There are so many reasons this doesn't make sense, unless the goal was more sinister than they say. They say this was preplanned and officials knew (but not NYC mayor?). If it was preplanned, how is it they failed to consider the resulting terror?... maybe they did but that was a risk they were willing to take?... for the sake of a photo that could have been so very easily and cheaply fabricated... and if there are photos, bring em on and let us all get over it already - unless there are other reasons they cannot show the photos. Geez, even a 10 year old child plans a bike ride with more careful consideration - (unless he or she is up to no good)!
Loreann| 5.9.09 @ 2:30PM
Needs to be done - released publicly - not just "mulled over". And that Caldera dude - he is a pawn. Probably has enough years to retire fully - so suggesting by his resigning this issue goes away - NO WAY!
Passenger manifest - released fully - without any blacked out sections - to the public NOW. You know - all of us who paid for that 9/11 re-enacting terror inflicting waste of public monies flight over New York.
WHO WAS ON BOARD?!!!
Impeachment Now| 5.9.09 @ 11:12PM
Everything this administration does is BAD, EVERYTHING!
Phileas| 4.24.10 @ 11:30AM
En viitsi täällä mainostaa firmaa, mutta hampaani todellakin tulivat valkoisiksi. Käynnistä on nyt noin 8 kk, mutta tulokset ovat vieläkin selvät ja näkyvät. Juon aika paljon kahvia, silloin tällöin myös punaviiniä , joten hampaiden värjäytyminen tapahtuu aika nopeasti, mutta en enää ota stressiä siitä, sillä nyt tiedän että saan hampaani jälleen valkoisiksi heti kun haluan.
lokiu| 4.7.10 @ 8:24PM
Flyover Launcher is good article thanks you very much for your information
Poptropica
Poptropica
cheap flights | 10.24.11 @ 11:02AM
thank you
cheap flights | 10.24.11 @ 11:02AM
thank you
opert| 4.27.10 @ 6:46AM
ArenaBetting.com dukung fair play FIFA world cup AFSEL 2010
dunia pewayangan
thank you very much
vouchercodes | 1.6.11 @ 8:42AM
I love it
rechie | 10.24.11 @ 10:56AM
This blog is an exact representation of skills. I appreciate the blogger for posting the most excellent thought. This topic posted by you is trustworthy. I like you recommendation.Your recommendation is of well use to people. A great article post, this is something very interesting. A great concept that reflects the excellent thoughts of the writer.hcg
balcuizar62| 10.13.11 @ 4:23AM
It's this sort of honor to achieve the chance to join the discussion with this great blog page! I would like to extend my many thanks this.
yaz class action
balcuizar62| 10.13.11 @ 4:23AM
It's this sort of honor to achieve the chance to join the discussion with this great blog page! I would like to extend my many thanks this.
yaz class action
shia| 10.18.11 @ 10:00AM
thank you for giving me a chance to read your blog again keep it up..
mesothelioma lawyer
creamer| 10.20.11 @ 3:01AM
wow!wow! nicole is very hot! i really wanna be with her in my whole life..nice post..thanks for posting this!
Actos Attorneys
abominable putridity| 11.5.11 @ 4:12PM
alternative for people and this article can help anybody. It have been known
you that
L Tod Schlosser
wow| 11.13.11 @ 9:53PM
I'll definitely be bookmarking this site! Really helpful - great post. You answered my question! Thank you.
zoloft lawsuits
bogol| 11.16.11 @ 1:50PM
I really appreciate sharing this great post. Keep up your work. I want to express my admiration of your writing skill and ability to make readers read from the beginning to the end. I would like to read newer posts and to share my thoughts with you.
Actos Lawyer
bogol| 12.2.11 @ 6:35AM
well i get this stuff from my friend and he said to share this blog to every one and i just said thanks for posting and sharing with me.
asbestos attorney
inah0911| 12.7.11 @ 7:34AM
so i like to say some people say this is the blog they talking about and some people say its good to be here to and i confirm it they got right to thanks your the best for me..
foreclosure califorina
IMYI| 12.15.11 @ 10:11PM
I am very happy for providing the nice info in this blog and the great services is utilized for this website. I had really like it very much for using the nice impression in this blog.
Medtronic Infuse Lawsuit
Wound Care| 1.3.12 @ 11:44AM
WOW, this'll keep me busy for years. I've been subscribing to your RSS feed for months, but somehow I missed this great list.
Wound Care