The Pilgrims who landed at Plymouth Rock in 1620 were an
idealistic lot. They were part of the broader Puritan movement
believing that the Anglican Church, recognized in law as the
official church of England, had strayed from true Christianity.
The Puritans were devoted to the Bible as the only true source of
Christian doctrine and practice and objected to Anglican
traditions and practices that had been added over the years from
outside of the Bible.
The Puritans more generally wanted to reform and purify the
Anglican church from within. But the Pilgrims were a subset of
Puritans that wanted to separate themselves from the Anglican
church entirely and practice their own true form of Christianity
on their own. The Anglicans in turn persecuted the Puritans as
heretics rebelling against the officially recognized Church of
England and their obligations to it under the law.
This is what led the Pilgrims to leave England seeking full
religious freedom. First they migrated to the Netherlands, which
practiced religious tolerance of alternative religions. But the
English Puritans wanted their children to grow up in an English
culture, not as Dutchmen. That is why after a few years they
sought to establish their own colony in the New World, where they
could control their own government, religion and culture.
Due to unexpected delays, wandering off course, and searching for
the best settlement site, the Mayflower, carrying 102
settlers, finally anchored at what was to become the settlement
of Plymouth on December 21, 1620, the dead of winter. William
Bradford, destined to become the second governor of the colony
and the longest serving, wrote in his diary while still on the
ship and contemplating “this poor people’s present condition”:
Being thus passed the vast ocean, they had now no friends to
welcome them, nor inns to entertain or refresh their
weatherbeaten bodies; no houses or much less towns to repair
to, or to seek for succor….And for the season it was winter,
and they know that the winters of that country [are] sharp and
violent, and subject to cruel and fierce storms, dangerous to
travel to known places, much more to search an unknown coast.
Besides, what could they see but a hideous and desolate
wilderness, full of wild beasts and wild men—and what
multitudes there might be of them they know not….If they looked
behind them, there was the mighty ocean which they had passed
and was now as a main bar and gulf to separate them from all
the civil parts of the world….What could now sustain them but
the spirit of God and his grace?
In these precarious conditions, it was natural for them to work
together and share their food and shelter. Even so, 45 of the
original 102 died that first winter, including 13 of the original
adult women, with one more passing away in May. During 1621, they
discovered a couple of English speaking Indians, who had learned
the language from fishermen hauling off fish from the New England
coast, but who had not settled. This included the famed Squanto,
who showed the settlers how to best hunt, fish, plant, and mine
essential commodities in the New World, served as their
exploration guide, and developed their relations with the
surrounding Indian tribes.
By 1623, four additional ships of settlers had arrived. The
colony had initially prospered just collecting wild growing food,
and securing plentiful game such as turkeys and deer providing
venison, supplemented by their own agriculture. Given their
religious devotion, their concern for personal wealth was not a
top issue for them, and even in that time idealistic notions of
communal property and sharing communal resources as offering an
ideal society of happiness had a strong appeal for those striking
out to start a new civilization from scratch.
But as the colony grew, this initial quasi-socialist community of
share and share alike was not working to produce enough for
essential basic needs, let alone the prosperity that was expected
in the new world. Available wild supplies of food, in particular,
were no longer enough. Bradford again wrote in his dairy,
All this while no supply [of wild corn] was heard of, neither
knew they when they might expect any. So they began to think
how they might raise as much corn as they could, and obtain a
better crop than they had done, that they might not thus
languish in misery. At length, after much debate of things, the
Governor (with the advice of the chiefist amongst them) gave
way that they should set corn every man for his own particular,
and in that regard trust to themselves; in all other things go
on in the general way as before. And so assigned to every
family a parcel of land, according to the proportion of their
number, for that end….This had very good success, for it made
all hands very industrious, so as much more corn was planted
than otherwise would have been by any means the Governor or any
other could use, and saved him a great deal of trouble, and
gave far better content. The women now went willingly into the
field, and took their little ones with them to set corn; which
before would allege weakness and inability, whom to have
compelled would have been thought great tyranny and oppression.
As indicated, this experiment in private agriculture was hugely
successful, with the colony’s agricultural output soaring. But
the settlers still increasingly complained that the colony’s
remaining communal practices and lack of complete private
property were constraining and unfair. Bradford wrote further in
his diary in 1623,
The experience that was had in this common course and
condition, tried sundry years and that amongst godly and sober
men, may well evince the vanity of that conceit of Plato’s and
other ancients applauded of by some of later times; that the
taking away of property and bringing in community into a
commonwealth would make them happy and flourishing, as if they
were wiser than God. For this community…was found to breed much
confusion and discontent and retard much employment that would
have been to their benefit and comfort. For the young men, that
were most able and fit for labor and service, did repine that
they should spend their time and strength to work for other
men’s wives and children without any recompense. The strong, or
man of parts, had no more in division of victuals and clothes
than he that was weak and not able to do a quarter the other
could; this was thought injustice….And for men’s wives to be
commanded to do service for other men, as dressing their meat,
washing their clothes, etc., they deemed it a kind of
slavery….Let none object this is men’s corruption, and nothing
to the course [meaning communal policy] itself. I answer,
seeing all men have this corruption in them, God in his wisdom
saw another course fitter for them.
Thus was capitalism born in America, sentimental notions of
socialism having been tried and failed, not only as a matter of
economics, but also because it was seen as a regime of unjust
restrictions on personal liberty. The colony adopted private
property and free trade, ending its own critical financial
crisis, and creating the trademark bountiful American prosperity,
which drew waves of new settlers seeking the American dream that
had already been born.
THE COLONY OF JAMESTOWN, established even earlier in Virginia in
1607, was quite different. Its settlers were not idealistic
separatists seeking religious freedom, but entrepreneurs seeking
riches. The English government wisely contracted out settlement
of the New World, in this case chartering the Virginia Company of
London in 1606 to finance and maintain settlements in Virginia,
through funds raised from private investors. The company obtained
and fitted out three ships carrying 105 passengers, which
departed England for the New World in December, 1606.
Arriving in the more hospitable spring season of 1607 in the more
friendly Virginia climate, its venturers immediately started
searching for the gold and other easy riches the Spanish had so
readily found in their New World explorations. But Virginia did
not offer such quick riches. With the settlement party composed
more of businessmen and aristocrats not accustomed to the manual
labor necessary for survival in the New World, the settlement was
soon in danger of failure. The aristocrats expected others to
provide for their basic needs. Those capable and willing to build
shelter, hunt for game, and raise food were not willing to yield
to the heavy effective taxation that would be needed to provide
for the entire settlement through their own work alone. Thus
Jamestown faced a similar financial crisis as the later Pilgrims.
Jason | 11.26.08 @ 6:27AM
I hope we don't have to suffer with this socialist nonsense for long, but what society has ever recovered from socialism?
http://rightklik.blogspot.com/
Agent Orange Peel | 11.26.08 @ 6:35AM
TODAY, WE KNOW as well how to solve our own financial crisis and restore American prosperity.
Who is "WE"? "WE" certainly aren't the politicians in Washington. The politicians for the last eight years that is (mostly Republicans) and probably the ones for the next eight years (mostly Democrats).
Daphne Kenward| 11.26.08 @ 8:19AM
Hold on a minute here, over the past eight year's America was blessed with guess what, low taxes. So if low taxes creates better economic wealth, and growth what happend?.
I think someone out there has ignored the little problem called greed, the more people have it's the more they want.
If people want oil to drive gas gusselers, what does the masses think the government use to pay for it if no one is paying any taxes, under the low tax system?. You want war, where does the government gets the money from to pay for war. Where does the government gets the money from to buy and invest in America war machines, where does the government get's the money from to pay the people who fight in these wars?. Where does the money come from to pay for treatment for the people who become crippled in wars?. How do you pay for bridges, roads, education?. The list could go on and on and on. Are you sure you want to be safe? if so you need a Police force, who pays their wages, have a guess, it comes out of taxes.
GV Berlichingen| 11.26.08 @ 9:25AM
Along with D.K., I too want to see improvements in the American military, veterans welfare, infrasturcture, and education. I hope that is where the libs will focus future tax revenues. More basics Mr. President! Less change!
Speedbump| 11.26.08 @ 10:13AM
Daphne, what happened was Socialism...the nonsense of forcing the banking industry to make loans to parties who could not afford them, and the government then rewarding the banks for doing so caused the financial industry to make a run for the bottom...the Democrat party then saw an opportunity for their October Surprise, and pulled the rug out, thus tanking the economy...
As far as taxes go, I suggest you re-read the article above until you fully understand the fact that government is a short circuit on productivity; lower taxes lead to more prosperity, and thus more revenue to the government, because actual wealth is created by free people acting on resources...everytime money changes hands in the private sector, wealth is created...government cannot create wealth, and the only way it can create jobs is to keep more money in the private sector through low marginal tax rates...
These are incontrovertible facts; you cannot make any argument against them...it's the way reality works for the human species...
Brian Casey| 11.26.08 @ 10:18AM
I'm afraid D.K. Is a product of public education and has been watching just a bit too much TV. Since when has the government been providing us with gas for are cars, and for as long as I can remember schools have been asking for more money,when do we start benefiting from what we've given. I could go on but what the hec.The balls in Obamas court now.
Gazinya| 11.26.08 @ 12:15PM
I enjoy history. I enjoyed reading to two comparisons of possible economic systems that went bankrupt. The first one in the article was of a false sense that God loves communes and not individual industrious endevores. It was a blind yet unsupported belief in a religious system that nearly killed the colony.
The next is the purely humanistic approach. This perticular system seems to be the one on which we know find ourselves. We have our own aristocrates who refuse to work for the colony yet by fiat claim a part of others work. We call them polititians. A ever growing class of aristocrates are called Liberals. Liberals clutch at the bounty of others. This is a system that, like the religious system, produces lazy people and people who end up coveting the wealth of others. "You reap what you sow."
D.K. you asked where the aristocrates get all the money? Well, after havesting the best they then go back and take from those that follow the thresher trying to gleen the left overs.
Katelyn| 11.26.08 @ 12:31PM
Wonderful article! I'm printing it out to read it at Thanksgiving dinner.
Alan Brooks| 11.26.08 @ 1:50PM
It's worse than you think, DK probably went to private schools but... well...Ted Kennedy had the best education...
You can't turn a sow's ear into a silk purse.
Frank Natoli| 11.26.08 @ 4:12PM
In November 2004, I attended Sunday Mass at St. Joseph's Catholic Church in Miami Beach, the Sunday before Thanksgiving. In the middle of the Mass, there was a procession of children, dressed in costume for the occasion. Approximately 20 of the children were dressed in Indian [native American] garb. Exactly two of the children were dressed in Pilgrim garb. That was a fact. I speculate that the two "Pilgrims" were beaten and/or bribed by their parents, lest none of the children of the congregation dare dress in the hated and contemptible English settler garb. I wrote to Pastor Enrique Estrada about the peculiar ratio of Indians to Pilgrims, of course not receiving the courtesy of a reply.
Today there was a radio report of "someone" complaining about a similar Thanksgiving re-enactment. Was the complaint similar to mine? No! The complainant, today, accused the producers of the re-enactment of combining Holocaust victims [Indians] with Holocaust perpetrators [Pilgrims].
Anyone want to bet who the current complainants voted for a few weeks ago?
Alan Brooks| 11.26.08 @ 6:17PM
Write a letter to Enrique Estrada and ask him why Cortez, Pizarro, and other brutal Hispanic swines invaded Indian territory.
Best Thanksgiving would be to invite all illegal immigrants to feasts, then for dessert load them into trucks, drive them to the southern border and let them out onto Mexican territory.
Best holiday ever.
Tripp| 11.26.08 @ 8:44PM
Too bad once the "pilgrims" reached the New World they in turn practiced some of the fiercest religious persecution that would have made Caligula blush... if I sound like an Anglophile, well I admit I am an Anglican and fiercely devoted to keeping the church's traditions not too far from what Henry VIII would have had in mind. But I digress- the point is to Mr. Ferrara- I would not be so swift as to point out these radical Calvinists as examples for anything Americans should place value in, other than perhaps their hard work. But the Catholic Hapsburgs worked hard, as did the faithful Anglicans in Jamestown and Roanoke. The ones who ALSO practiced religious tolerance even while escaping religious persecution should be the ones we are thankful for giving us this terrific, free country, and not the super-zealous Puritans from the Plymouth colony.
mike| 11.27.08 @ 7:57AM
Daphne, the total tax bite from our annual income is 55% after all social security, witholding, property, gas, state sales tax etc. My wife loves her job but works 80 hours a week serving children. I have my own company and am in an industry that is getting smoked by the downturn making it almost impossible to not have severe layoffs of half of my employees after the first of the year or have to shut down the company.
CAN YOU TELL ME HOW OBAMA'S IDEA TO GIVE ME A $3000 TAX CREDIT TO HIRE NEW EMPLOYEES WILL HELP THE ONES I'LL HAVE TO LAYOFF?
Chris DeWeese | 11.27.08 @ 11:30AM
Let us all pray for Obama to see the light. I'd rather live in a successful country with more freedom see the things that Obama wants come to fruition. Hopefully he will 'change' his mind one more time....
John personal trainer austin | 11.27.08 @ 12:48PM
"He who does not work does not eat."
Good plan. The logic of that does not sit well with socialists.
Chuck E| 11.27.08 @ 1:33PM
John,
Hate to break it to you;
"He who does not work, neither shall he eat is the first principle of socialism according to Vladimir Lenin. The phrase is mentioned in his State and Revolution (1917). Through this slogan Lenin explains that in a socialist society (which Karl Marx termed "the first phase of communism") only productive individuals would be allowed access to the articles of consumption. "
http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/He-who-does-not-work,-neither-shall-he-eat
Christianity is a lot more socialist than most Americans are comfortable acknowledging.
Daphne Kenward| 11.27.08 @ 3:17PM
Speedbump.
You know what? all responsible government have a fiscal policies, and a budget policy, so you know what you have coming in and what you have going out.
Hear is the catch, if you have low tax means you have less coming in, and you have more going out, guess what, you are over spending, so if that is allowed to go on over time you create what is called a deficit.
You cannot have a balanced budget while over spending at the same time. So where do you think the government gets the money from the short fall, they have to borrow. So if you are borrowing more than what you have coming in, what do you call that? I call it being Bankrupt, others call it lending poor people money to buy homes, lending poor people money to buy homes can't bankrupt a country the size of America.
America is where it is due to lack of sensible governance, if you are in office for 8 years, one should have an idea what the expenditure for that economy is. If for example if you are spending ore than you have coming in, sensible government needs to raise taxes, to cover for the short fall. Then there is the balance of payment deficit, which America does not speak about, well I'll speak about it it is 56 Trillion dollars, and that does not enclude this financial year. In real terms America is a Bankrupt economy. America's balance of payment deficit is enough to bring down the globe. Because they print and spend, there is no control, so eventually you end up with high inflation, and slow growth, Americas gross Domestic Product for next year is approx 0.9% or 1.3% there abouts, for a country the size of the United States America has a huge problem. Europe collectively is aproximately 3.5%. You really cant balme the poor for trying to buy a house, they were paying for their homes while they had jobs. The problem is far bigger than what the Average Americans hear in the news.
Howard Veit | 11.27.08 @ 4:27PM
Let's point out that nobody would loan them money either. It was either work or starve.
Daphne Kenward| 11.27.08 @ 7:30PM
Mike.
You know what I feel it for you, it is truely a difficult time. I would look into laying off staff as difficult as it is, and re-employ them if you can and see if you would still qualify for the $3'000,
The other thing would be can you find any areas you could cut back in. Or may be job shair where one full time position becomes two part time jobs.
Mike I wish I had better advice for you, I hope that things begins to pick up for you and many others who are hard working Americans who just want to be productive in society, I hope things work out for you, God Bless.
Marc Jeric| 11.27.08 @ 8:11PM
The first 18 months of the Bush Administration were blessed by the Clinton recession deepened by the attack of 9/11. After that we had 5 years of remarkable growth due to the Bush tax cuts. Then came the Democrat majority, driven to power by the lies and propaganda of the far left, aided and abbeted by our MSM. This financial crisis and the growing recession is entirely due to Reid, Pelosi, Shumer, Frank, and Dobbs.
Chuck E| 11.27.08 @ 8:47PM
Marc,
Here's something else Republicans have been particularly good at growing:
http://zfacts.com/p/318.html
Tax cuts certainly did help, though not nearly as much as easy credit. And we're now seeing how well that worked out.
Everyone was getting rich off poor people building houses (nothing drives the economy like home construction). Problem was, we were selling stuff to people who couldn't pay for it. That's phoney sales and phoney growth - as we now see.
Some free advice; if want Republicans to win the next election stop thinking that people are stupid. When you do, you're not willing to put in the hard work winning elections requires. Instead, you think all you have to do is tell a few lies and the votes will fall into place because, you know, people are stupid.
tom| 11.27.08 @ 11:23PM
This might be a nice illustration of the evils of socialism and the remarkable efficiency of capitalism, if it were true. The Plymouth Pilgrims landed in 1620. The rocky soil in the area made it difficult to impossible to grow crops under any economic system and the economy was based on trading fur and fish until the colony was absorbed into the Massachusetts Bay Colony in 1691. The very first experiments in distributing private land started in 1627 in order to allow for grazing of the cattle which arrived that year, so "privatization" of land obviously didn't play an important role in the colony's early survival. In fact, the colony was never considered prosperous but the Pilgrims tolerated their poverty only because they were allowed to practice their faith without persecution.
Dr Risk| 11.28.08 @ 1:21AM
Alan Brooks
Yeah, Teddy Kennedy had the best education his daddy could buy. Until he got thrown out of Harvard for hiring someone to take his Spanish exam for him.
"You can look it up." ~ Casey Stengel
Daphne Kenward| 11.28.08 @ 6:27AM
I know what it's like to want things now, but the idea of borrow and spend is what has crippled the global economy.
The only thing anyone should borrow to buy is a house, and that is with 25% deposit of the total cost, that 25% deposit shows you are a responsible borrower. Buy second hand furniture till you are able to buy new, cash not credit.
If you build your house on sand do not be surprised when it slips away. People are confused by the word Conservatism. To be a Conservative means To protect values and manitain good laws and good family values. Encouraging people to be irresponsible, is not a good prinsiple.
Buying things you cannot afford, using credit, while not knowing the impact a sudden change could inflict on ones means to pay or feed ones family.
gerry| 11.29.08 @ 8:15AM
The early settlers survived because they knew the God of the Bible. It didn't take them too long to realize that they were in violation of His laws. The Bible says, "The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge, but fools despise wisdom and destruction " Proverbs 1:7.
I know that this sounds corny to most people, but we better get it right real quick. The nation that follows God Prospers. "Blessed is the Nation whose God is the LORD. Psalm 33:12
Alan Brooks| 11.30.08 @ 9:55PM
I like catholicism only-- Martin Luther was a nazi and I curse Luther in his grave!
UP with the Pope, to hell with protestants, including the puritans.
Daphne kenward| 12.1.08 @ 10:56AM
Alan.
Don't forget to curse Adolph Hitler as well he was a Catholic, blessed by the pope, in all his endeavours. And George W Bush and his family for their envolvment, in monetary support.
When the masses know the power they have, they can decide not to fight, the Muslims, for the Christians, and the protestant should not fight the Catholics, for the Christians Protestants.
All have one thing in common, they are all poor and illinformed, and are being used as a tool to promote injustice worldwide.
Jeff Hatzenbeller| 2.23.09 @ 2:45PM
What's odd to me is that liberals desire to adopt much of what socialism has to offer. Yet, it was Vladimir Lenin who said, "He who does not work, neither shall he eat." Apparently this aspect to socialism isn't taken very serioiusly by American liberals who think that The Great Society measures of welfare and "economic assistance" were good ideas.
Pingback| 3.10.09 @ 10:33PM
» The Pilgrims’ Financial Crisis The Liberty Tree Lantern links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
koolgirl92| 7.8.09 @ 10:58AM
サイト制作
ドレス レンタル
アートメイク
アパレル
アロマセラピー
恵比寿 メンズエステ
恵比寿 エステ
ダイエット クエン酸
レストラン ウェディング
ランコム
エスティローダー
ルナソル
神社
建設機械レンタル
キャッシング | 7.23.09 @ 5:05AM
現在,日本は国民の9人に1人がキャッシングを利用しており,国民1人あたり2枚のクレジットカードを保有している「キャッシング大国」です。
Dave | 3.18.10 @ 8:08AM
DAVE
Pingback| 5.10.10 @ 4:51PM
This is Great! - Page 3 - G35Driver links to this page. Here’s an excerpt: