The smart folks over at Investors Business Daily offered one of the most comprehensive “decodings” of President Obama’s Syria/ISIS strategy — after the president told our friends and foes alike that he doesn’t have one.
Tonight at 9 PM EDT, we’ll get the latest “reset” in strategy…days after a speech at a NATO meeting in which Obama basically laid out three different near-strategies within just a few minutes of each other.
At this point, the whole thing bores me, despite recognizing its seriousness.
Here are my predictions what he’ll say:
Beyond the fact that I’m even more tired of hearing Obama than he seems to be of being president, there’s an enormous problem (or should I say another enormous problem) with how this is being done: The finger-in-the-wind public discussion of air strikes in Syria has certainly encouraged ISIS leadership to take up both dispersed and hardened positions and to do the same — especially the dispersal — for their forces and weaponry. With no anticipated “boots on the ground” (not that I’m arguing for them), air power is of use only where there is at least a moderate sized gathering of bad guys and their weapons.
By telegraphing his next moves against ISIS, Obama has all but guaranteed that they will have minimal impact.