Spain has just made a decision that future governments will be unable to reverse, future voters will be unable to correct, and future generations will be forced to live with.
By royal decree, the Sánchez government has announced it will grant legal residence and work permits to roughly half a million illegal migrants already inside the country. The measure is due to take effect in April 2026 and applies to those who can prove presence in Spain before the end of 2025 and who lack a criminal record, including many whose asylum claims were rejected or left unresolved, as reported by Reuters. (RELATED: Sánchez’s Spain Is a Caricature of Political Corruption)
This is being presented as compassion. In reality, it is a political act of extraordinary consequence, executed in a manner that reveals far more than the rhetoric surrounding it.
The choice of instrument matters. This was not legislation debated in parliament, amended, or subjected to the friction that democratic systems are designed to impose on decisions with permanent effects. It was imposed by decree. Governments do not govern this way when they are seeking consent. They govern this way when they are seeking finality.
What distinguishes this decision is its timing, its scale, and its strategic usefulness. It arrives as Spain’s conservative opposition has gained support…
Spain’s leaders insist the policy merely “recognises reality.” But governments recognise reality every day without taking steps of this magnitude. What distinguishes this decision is its timing, its scale, and its strategic usefulness. It arrives as Spain’s conservative opposition has gained support by articulating something most citizens understand instinctively: that immigration enforcement has weakened, overstays are routine, removals are rare, and the costs of this failure are borne by the public whether they consent or not. (RELATED: How Islam Conquered Catholic Spain — Again)
Rather than answer that argument, the government has chosen to remove it from democratic contention altogether.
The political logic is neither subtle nor novel. If enforcement becomes politically inconvenient, redefine it as immoral. If public concern grows, delegitimise it. And if the electorate begins to drift in the wrong direction, change the conditions under which future elections are fought. (RELATED: What’s Really Causing the Minnesota ‘Insurrection’?)
Within days of the announcement, crowds began forming outside embassies and consulates across Spain, as migrants rushed to obtain criminal-record certificates and proof of nationality required to qualify for the amnesty. These scenes were documented in real time. The Daily Mail published photographs of long queues outside embassies serving Pakistan and several African states, with applicants seeking the final paperwork needed to convert illegal presence into legal residence.
Similar pressure was reported at missions representing Morocco, Senegal, Mali, Guinea, and Nigeria, particularly in Madrid and Barcelona. This reaction matters because it exposes a basic truth governments prefer not to acknowledge: people respond to incentives, not assurances. The state can insist this is a one-off measure. What migrants hear is simpler. Stay long enough, and the system gives way.
Spain’s undocumented population is now estimated at around 840,000, a dramatic increase from less than a decade ago, according to Associated Press reporting.
A significant share of those eligible for regularization come from Muslim-majority countries and Sub-Saharan Africa, including Pakistan and several West African states. At the same time, irregular crossings into Spain continue, particularly along the Canary Islands route from West Africa, despite repeated assurances that the amnesty will not encourage further arrivals. This ongoing flow has been widely reported, including by the Guardian.
What is rarely stated plainly — but matters more than any domestic justification — is what legal status in Spain actually confers.
Once regularised, these migrants will hold lawful residence in a Schengen member state. That means freedom of movement across much of Europe: the ability to travel onward to France, Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands, and beyond, with minimal friction and without internal border controls. A decision taken in Madrid, therefore, does not remain Spanish. It becomes European.
The claim that a mass regularization of this scale carries no signalling effect does not withstand scrutiny. Smuggling networks do not parse ministerial intent. They observe outcomes. Spain has just demonstrated that prolonged illegality is not a dead end, but a stage — and that the reward is not merely papers, but mobility across a continent.
Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has responded to criticism not with caution, but with moral bravado. “When did recognising rights become something radical?” he asked, framing the decree as historic justice and dismissing opponents rather than addressing their concerns. When the charge of political advantage was raised, he brushed it aside with a line crafted for social media rather than statecraft: “Mars can wait. Humanity can’t,” as reported by the Guardian.
Legal status is not an endpoint. It is a multiplier. Once granted, family reunification follows by law. Communities consolidate. Dependence on public systems increases. Citizenship pathways open. Over time, a population that arrived unlawfully becomes a permanent political fact — not because of ideology, but because of arithmetic.
No serious government is unaware of this. Which is why the decree was delivered as a fait accompli. Parliamentary debate would have introduced friction. Friction would have invited scrutiny. Scrutiny would have forced trade-offs into the open. A decree avoids all of that. It projects inevitability.
And inevitability is the point.
Spain has therefore sent a clear message — to migrants, to smuggling networks, and to its European neighbours — that outcomes will be decided first, and acceptance managed later. Rules apply until they become inconvenient. Illegality is tolerated, then rewarded. Objections are not debated; they are neutralised.
People can live with losing elections. They cannot live indefinitely with the discovery that decisions carrying permanent consequences have been taken beyond their reach, that the argument is over, not because it was settled, but because it was closed.
What follows now is not a theory, but an experiment — one whose consequences will not be confined to Spain. Hundreds of thousands of newly regularized residents will now move freely across Europe. How this reshapes politics, public trust, and social cohesion is no longer a question of intention, but of consequence.
We will see, in time, how this plays out.
History suggests it rarely plays out quietly.
READ MORE from Kevin Cohen:
Drug Gangs, Child Gunmen and Antisemitic Abuse — Welcome to Marseille
