Doesn’t the ruling and Carpenter’s argument bolster the case that Constitutional amendments on this subject (even the variety Thompson most recently suggested) are less urgent and possibly unneccessary at this point? If state supreme courts left to their own devices and reading the political tea leaves in their own states have put the brakes on imposing same sex marriage by judicial fiat do we have solutions in search of a problem?
Notice to Readers: The American Spectator and Spectator World are marks used by independent publishing companies that are not affiliated in any way. If you are looking for The Spectator World please click on the following link: https://spectatorworld.com/.
