This piece makes some reasonable points, but I have to wonder what self-styled reformist conservatives are thinking when they write things like this: “The conservative rump’s reactions to Arlen Specter’s switch have been predictable and disappointing.”
Who is the intended audience for this kind of argument? Who is it attempting to persuade? People who have basically given up on a majority Republicans — that is, the “conservative rump” — are in a poor position to influence them.
Notice to Readers: The American Spectator and Spectator World are marks used by independent publishing companies that are not affiliated in any way. If you are looking for The Spectator World please click on the following link: https://thespectator.com/world.