"Costly" Tax Cuts - The American Spectator | USA News and Politics
“Costly” Tax Cuts

Matt Yglesias writes that Jim DeMint’s alternative plan contains $3.1 trillion of permanent tax cuts, which he says “would be over triple as costly as the stimulus that will soon be signed” (emphasis mine). Whenever liberals, the media, and fiscal analysts write about “costly” tax cuts, I wonder, costly to whom? When the government cuts taxes (and in this context I am talking about rate cuts rather than government subsidies masquerading as tax cuts), they are allowing taxpayers to keep more of the money they earned. Taxpayers — who are the ones who finance the government — are sending away less of their money. In the real world, that’s called savings. Sure, government may end up with less revenue as a result, but that’s only a problem if you take it as a given that government has to grow at a certain rate every year, rather than shrink.

Sign Up to receive Our Latest Updates! Register

Notice to Readers: The American Spectator and Spectator World are marks used by independent publishing companies that are not affiliated in any way. If you are looking for The Spectator World please click on the following link: https://spectatorworld.com/.

Be a Free Market Loving Patriot. Subscribe Today!