"Costly" Tax Cuts - The American Spectator | USA News and Politics
“Costly” Tax Cuts

Matt Yglesias writes that Jim DeMint’s alternative plan contains $3.1 trillion of permanent tax cuts, which he says “would be over triple as costly as the stimulus that will soon be signed” (emphasis mine). Whenever liberals, the media, and fiscal analysts write about “costly” tax cuts, I wonder, costly to whom? When the government cuts taxes (and in this context I am talking about rate cuts rather than government subsidies masquerading as tax cuts), they are allowing taxpayers to keep more of the money they earned. Taxpayers — who are the ones who finance the government — are sending away less of their money. In the real world, that’s called savings. Sure, government may end up with less revenue as a result, but that’s only a problem if you take it as a given that government has to grow at a certain rate every year, rather than shrink.

Sign up to receive our latest updates! Register

By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: The American Spectator, 122 S Royal Street, Alexandria, VA, 22314, http://spectator.org. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact

Be a Free Market Loving Patriot. Subscribe Today!