This morning the offices of the French satirical magazine
Charlie Hebdo were destroyed
as two firebombs were thrown through its windows. The attack
came as its “Sharia edition” was set to be released.
Fortunately, there was no loss of life and no injuries were
reported.
This “Sharia edition” featured the Prophet Mohammed as a guest
editor with commentary on the recent Tunisian elections in which
Islamists claimed victory.
It is worth noting that in 2006 Charlie Hebdo also
reprinted the infamous Prophet Mohammed cartoons which were
originally published in the Danish newspaper
Jyllands-Posten. Two Muslim organizations sued
Charlie Hebdo for their publication but their case was
dismissed the following year.
The attack has been condemned across the political spectrum in
France and the City of Paris has said they will help Charlie
Hebdo find a new home.
Now I have no doubt there are French Muslims who are genuinely
offended by this publication. But there is a proper way to express
one’s indignation. Acts of terrorism, hooliganism and
intimidation simply cannot be tolerated in any way, shape or
form. Do French Catholics and Jews behave in this manner in the
face of an affront? If France’s Muslim community wishes to gain
broader acceptance then it needs to reign in not only those who
would commit violence but those who would incite it.
Bob K.| 11.2.11 @ 10:38AM
What is the proper way to express indignation over this? Shake one's finger at them and say, "You guys better cut this s*** out!"??
thomas mc| 11.2.11 @ 11:51AM
Religion is the seed of mental illness.
With God all things r possible| 11.2.11 @ 12:16PM
Atheism is the flower of relational dysfunction (with one's father) and/or moral compromise.
davod| 11.2.11 @ 12:19PM
Don't forget that the Danish cartoon controversy did take off until one of the Islamists in Denmark went to the Middle-East to stir the pot. He stirred the pot with cartoons, the worst of which he drew.
davod| 11.2.11 @ 12:21PM
Sorry "did take" should be "did not take"
With God all things r possible| 11.2.11 @ 12:27PM
This is like the proverbial story of the scorpion and the frog, in which the scorpion fatally stings the frog who has carried him only halfway across the river, and says, "What can I say? It's my nature!"
Devoted followers of the religio-political system known as Islam, which was begun in violence and is bent on world domination, will inflict violence on others and dominate them, because it has increasingly become their nature.
When the percentage of a population passes 5 - 8% Muslim, such intimidation typically begins. Muslims who abhor such attacks should speak out against it, but they should also recognize that they did not get their moderating feelings from Islam, but from some other source. What they will most likely get from Islam is revenge for daring to oppose jihad and intimidation.
TexasMom2012| 11.2.11 @ 12:37PM
My solution is to tell the entire Islamic community of the world that we we destroy Mecca with nuclear bombs the next time there is any attack by their community. Any bombing, beheading, or jihadist attack will result in the destruction of their most holy site. It is up to them to police themselves and they alone will be responsible is there is another attack. We will then warn the inhabitants of the city, 24 hours notice prior to destroying Mecca and any who remain can have their "virgins" in their afterlife. Next attack, Medina and so on until they stop the attacks or every holy Islamic site is destroyed. Then start on the Mosques around the world. Either they will cease the attacks or we will destroy Islam.
PattyMor| 11.2.11 @ 2:31PM
Ah, yes and where's Molly? You know the lady who wanted to sponsor Let's Draw Mohammed Day? She in the witness protection program. Islam is not tolerant or accomodative, but expects to be elevated above all other religions. We let it into our country much to our detriment.
Occam's Tool| 11.2.11 @ 3:08PM
Ron Paul loves Islam. Do Not Criticize Ron Paul.
Clint| 11.2.11 @ 3:13PM
The Screwball Israel Fister Maniac,Tool Job Is In The Building.
Dr.Ron Paul,
" While President Obama’s demand that Israel
make hard concessions in her border conflicts may very well be in her
long-term interest, only Israel can make that determination on her own,
without pressure from the United States or coercion by the United
Nations.
“Unlike this President, I do not believe it is our place to dictate how
Israel runs her affairs. There can only be peace in the region if those
sides work out their differences among one another. We should respect
Israel’s sovereignty and not try to dictate her policy from Washington."
The Tea Party Rebellion Is Here.