No sooner do I get through
hammering David Frum for his errors than I turn around to
discover that we are to be afflicted with new
plagues from the Duke of Dull, that eminent Master of
Mediocrity, Michael Gerson.
Not content merely to waste newsprint with his
boring biweekly forays to the frontiers of
obviousness on the
op-ed pages of The Washington Post, the Titan of
Tedium has now combined with former Bush deputy Peter
Wehner to subject the unwitting subscribers of
Commentary to a potentially lethal soporific entitled,
"The
Path to Republican Revival."
This is a classic example of what inevitably happens when
bureaucrats attempt journalism. At nearly 5,000 words, this
massive malodorous manure pile might be mined like a
Comstock Lode of idiocy, yet its telling point is this bland
sentence:
Republicans will also have to put forth a comprehensive reform
agenda.
Wrong. Wrong, wrong, wrong. How many times do we
need to tell the policy wonks that, in opposition,
conservatives ought not be too specific in offering alternatives
to the policies of Obama, Pelosi, Reid et al.? Given the
current powerlessness of the GOP, it is their duty as
the opposition to remind Americans daily that the
Democrats are leading the country straight to hell.
Republicans need not, and arguably should not, offer their
own roadmap to heaven, which can then be picked apart at
leisure by the Democrats' own policy wonks. In opposition,
the GOP should instead concentrate on fomenting
resistance to the incumbent party's agenda, campaigning on a
pledge to reverse course, and be content that the policy
specifics of that promised reversal will be hashed out
after the Democrats are dismounted.
The Gerson/Wehner call for a "comprehensive reform
agenda" is patent nonsense, the exact opposite of sound
opposition strategy, a make-work project for
underemployed former Bushlings.
Gerson, readers will recall, was chief of the Bush White House
speechwriting shop, in which he glory-hogged all the credit while
mismanaging the talents of better writers. Matthew
Scully has related that tale, and our straying friend David
Frum was among Scully's co-sufferers under the Gerson
regime. And in that, Frum certainly deserves our sympathy.
Whatever David Frum's errors, they are at least usually
interesting errors. By contrast, Gersonism is a
Brompton cocktail of bad writing in service of bad ideas, a
surefire formula for Republican suicide.
Let's not forget that Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and Barack Obama
offered NO SPECIFICS WHATSOEVER when running in opposition in
2006 and 2008. Indeed, they claimed no such specifics were
needed.
So why, pray tell, is the GOP uniquely required to do so?
Opposition, as the Dems are finding, is much easier than leading.
Don't think it would hurt to have some guiding, defining
principles that would be useful once you were back in leadership.
"Don't think it would hurt to have some guiding, defining
principles that would be useful once you were back in leadership"
Agreed, Bobby. However, conservatives need no lectures on
"guiding, defining principles" from a clueless self-important
dullard like Michael Gerson. And if you can stay awake long
enough to actually read his and Wehner's 5,000-word waste of
pixels, I think you'll find their thesis can be summed up as,
"Don't try anything that Arlen Specter or Susan Collins might
possibly vote against."
Being boring is bad. Being wrong is worse. Being wrong and boring
is the worst.
Derek Leaberry| 8.19.09 @ 4:09PM
Now that Dick Cheney is off reservation, Michael Gerson and Peter
Wehner are the last of the forlorn tribe of Bushies not part of
the actual Bush family. What those two gentlemen offer is nothing
more than doom for conservatism and the Republican Party. King
Midas had more wisdom.
louis tully| 8.19.09 @ 4:38PM
"subject the unwitting subscribers of Commentary to a potentially
lethal soporific . . . "
Now we know why Commentary recently took the aarguably unusual
step of banning Comments on their own blog.
I don't look forward to a Republican revival; the memories of
TARP, Romneycare and bailouts are too fresh.
And if I were interested in a Whig revival, I think I'd pass over
Bush WH folks, along with McCain staffers!
When you're storming the gates of Berlin, you don't have a chat
with the Nazi scum to explain to them when, where and how the
Nuremberg trials will take place.
You attack. And don't let up.
The hard leftists of the Democratic party won't give up on a
public option, on co-ops, on whatever, so long as the eventual
goal is the destruction of the private healthcare insurance
industry. Heck, they've literally said as much.
The Republican party as it's currently situated doesn't have the
cajones or the political will to keep pushing, so it's up to the
bloggers, the grassroots, the "mobs of right-wing extremists" to
make the point for them.
I think it was LBJ who said if you're opponent wishes to make an
ass of himself, get out of the way (paraphrasing). The
Republicans are doing that for now, and the Democrats' and the
president's numbers are cliff-diving.
It was the president who said "if they bring a knive, we bring a
gun", which should be taken figuratively of course, but it is
what it is.
The Frums of the world only want acceptance by a complacent media
and a partisan government, which explains their buffoonery. Let
them continue to make buffoons of themselves.
Eventually the Republican leadership will have to come up with
some sort of plan, and let's pray that there is a conservative
basis for that. But for now, let the president waste his
political capital on having the Democratic party take full
ownership of this monstrosity.
c. j. acworth| 8.19.09 @ 5:36PM
"massive malodorous manure pile" , "Comstock Lode of idiocy" ?
Jeeze, McCain, don't hold back, tell us what you really think! :
)
First of all, we should never pretend to be, or seek to be, Santa
Claus. The conservative philosophy is antithetical to
immanentizing the eschaton. That is why, when applied, it works:
true conservatives understand that man and his world can never
achieve perfection.
Secondly, you are correct that any policy specifics we offer will
be picked apart by the Left. Not only that, they will be
distorted and lied about. The Left will do whatever it takes to
win—they always have because they are relativists and, more
importantly, because the believe so strongly that they have THE
ANSWER to all of man's problems. Morally we conservatives are
prevented from lowering ourselves to their level and battling
against them in the gutter. Therefore, we cannot afford to give
them the rope by which they will pull us down with their slimy
hands.
Finally, offering to simply turn back the tide of Progressivism
that has been engulfing our shores for a century and eroding our
foundations is enough of a platform. We have a real opportunity
here to begin to reverse one hundred years of Leftist thinking. A
great many of the peoples of the United States have finally
awoken to the dangers some of us have been warning about for
decades. This is our last chance. If we fail, Caesarism will
follow in the wake of our defeat. And then Gerson and Frum and
Parker, et. al. will be our Brutus and Cassius—and look how well
that worked [too foolish, too late].
Quoted from and linked to at:
http://www.thecampofthesaints.com/2009.08.16_arch.html#1250725033418
Frum and the Fifth Column insist upon "alternatives" for one
reason and one reason only: they feel they can control the agenda
by controlling who gets to craft these alternatives.
Look for how they use the "realistic" term. What is realistic is
what appeals to them. Period. When a conservative seeks to return
to the pre-Great Society free market of healthcare, we are not
being "realistic". That alternative is not valid.
But reforming Medicare---something that has been talked about
since the program began and yet has NEVER been done---that's
"realistic". Because Frum says so.
Meanwhile, the recent evidence of how Democrats came to power in
2006 and 2008 merely by running AGAINST Bush argues to the
contrary. Where's Frum's evidence that alternatives are needed
for victory on Election Day?
Ronsonic| 9.22.09 @ 2:05PM
They simply misunderstand everything that conservatism is about.
Big, dramatic, bold new plans are not conservative. Understanding
that people can take better care of themselves and their country
just by muddling along without big new initiatives is
conservative.
Policies that give people more and better options for taking care
of themselves is conservative. For better or worse, that doesn't
make for grand reading or big campaign promises. That was the act
of genius behind the "Contract with America" to whittle something
newsworthy out of conservative principles. Gerson and Wehner are
not ones to look to for works of genius.
Flip Converter Mac is a great mac flip converte mac and is often
used on mac os x. This flip converter for mac is a newly-designed
for Flip uses to convert flip video on mac os and convert flip hd
video to mainstream video and audio formats supported by various
portable players on mac. Therefore, it is a qualified flip hd video
converter mac.
Flip Video Converter is definitely the best choice for you to
convert Flip video to other formats and edit the video as you like.
The output formats it can support are like, 3GP, AVI, DV, FLV, MKV,
MPG, MOV, RM, RMVB, SWF, WMV, etc. So you can use this advanced
Flip Video Converter to convert your recorded video to many popular
players, including, Apple TV, BlackBerry, Creative Zen, Gphone,
Mobile Phone, PSP, Zune, iPhone, iPod, and iRiver....
Chris B| 8.19.09 @ 3:04PM
Amen, Brother !
Teflon93| 8.19.09 @ 3:36PM
Indeed.
Let's not forget that Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and Barack Obama offered NO SPECIFICS WHATSOEVER when running in opposition in 2006 and 2008. Indeed, they claimed no such specifics were needed.
So why, pray tell, is the GOP uniquely required to do so?
BobbyC3| 8.19.09 @ 3:39PM
Opposition, as the Dems are finding, is much easier than leading. Don't think it would hurt to have some guiding, defining principles that would be useful once you were back in leadership.
Robert Stacy McCain| 8.19.09 @ 4:02PM
"Don't think it would hurt to have some guiding, defining principles that would be useful once you were back in leadership"
Agreed, Bobby. However, conservatives need no lectures on "guiding, defining principles" from a clueless self-important dullard like Michael Gerson. And if you can stay awake long enough to actually read his and Wehner's 5,000-word waste of pixels, I think you'll find their thesis can be summed up as, "Don't try anything that Arlen Specter or Susan Collins might possibly vote against."
Being boring is bad. Being wrong is worse. Being wrong and boring is the worst.
Derek Leaberry| 8.19.09 @ 4:09PM
Now that Dick Cheney is off reservation, Michael Gerson and Peter Wehner are the last of the forlorn tribe of Bushies not part of the actual Bush family. What those two gentlemen offer is nothing more than doom for conservatism and the Republican Party. King Midas had more wisdom.
louis tully| 8.19.09 @ 4:38PM
"subject the unwitting subscribers of Commentary to a potentially lethal soporific . . . "
Now we know why Commentary recently took the aarguably unusual step of banning Comments on their own blog.
I don't look forward to a Republican revival; the memories of TARP, Romneycare and bailouts are too fresh.
And if I were interested in a Whig revival, I think I'd pass over Bush WH folks, along with McCain staffers!
John G.| 8.19.09 @ 4:44PM
When you're storming the gates of Berlin, you don't have a chat with the Nazi scum to explain to them when, where and how the Nuremberg trials will take place.
You attack. And don't let up.
The hard leftists of the Democratic party won't give up on a public option, on co-ops, on whatever, so long as the eventual goal is the destruction of the private healthcare insurance industry. Heck, they've literally said as much.
The Republican party as it's currently situated doesn't have the cajones or the political will to keep pushing, so it's up to the bloggers, the grassroots, the "mobs of right-wing extremists" to make the point for them.
I think it was LBJ who said if you're opponent wishes to make an ass of himself, get out of the way (paraphrasing). The Republicans are doing that for now, and the Democrats' and the president's numbers are cliff-diving.
It was the president who said "if they bring a knive, we bring a gun", which should be taken figuratively of course, but it is what it is.
The Frums of the world only want acceptance by a complacent media and a partisan government, which explains their buffoonery. Let them continue to make buffoons of themselves.
Eventually the Republican leadership will have to come up with some sort of plan, and let's pray that there is a conservative basis for that. But for now, let the president waste his political capital on having the Democratic party take full ownership of this monstrosity.
c. j. acworth| 8.19.09 @ 5:36PM
"massive malodorous manure pile" , "Comstock Lode of idiocy" ? Jeeze, McCain, don't hold back, tell us what you really think! : )
Robert Belvedere| 8.19.09 @ 7:42PM
Spot-on, Stacy.
First of all, we should never pretend to be, or seek to be, Santa Claus. The conservative philosophy is antithetical to immanentizing the eschaton. That is why, when applied, it works: true conservatives understand that man and his world can never achieve perfection.
Secondly, you are correct that any policy specifics we offer will be picked apart by the Left. Not only that, they will be distorted and lied about. The Left will do whatever it takes to win—they always have because they are relativists and, more importantly, because the believe so strongly that they have THE ANSWER to all of man's problems. Morally we conservatives are prevented from lowering ourselves to their level and battling against them in the gutter. Therefore, we cannot afford to give them the rope by which they will pull us down with their slimy hands.
Finally, offering to simply turn back the tide of Progressivism that has been engulfing our shores for a century and eroding our foundations is enough of a platform. We have a real opportunity here to begin to reverse one hundred years of Leftist thinking. A great many of the peoples of the United States have finally awoken to the dangers some of us have been warning about for decades. This is our last chance. If we fail, Caesarism will follow in the wake of our defeat. And then Gerson and Frum and Parker, et. al. will be our Brutus and Cassius—and look how well that worked [too foolish, too late].
Quoted from and linked to at:
http://www.thecampofthesaints.com/2009.08.16_arch.html#1250725033418
Teflon93| 8.20.09 @ 9:24AM
Frum and the Fifth Column insist upon "alternatives" for one reason and one reason only: they feel they can control the agenda by controlling who gets to craft these alternatives.
Look for how they use the "realistic" term. What is realistic is what appeals to them. Period. When a conservative seeks to return to the pre-Great Society free market of healthcare, we are not being "realistic". That alternative is not valid.
But reforming Medicare---something that has been talked about since the program began and yet has NEVER been done---that's "realistic". Because Frum says so.
Meanwhile, the recent evidence of how Democrats came to power in 2006 and 2008 merely by running AGAINST Bush argues to the contrary. Where's Frum's evidence that alternatives are needed for victory on Election Day?
Ronsonic| 9.22.09 @ 2:05PM
They simply misunderstand everything that conservatism is about. Big, dramatic, bold new plans are not conservative. Understanding that people can take better care of themselves and their country just by muddling along without big new initiatives is conservative.
Policies that give people more and better options for taking care of themselves is conservative. For better or worse, that doesn't make for grand reading or big campaign promises. That was the act of genius behind the "Contract with America" to whittle something newsworthy out of conservative principles. Gerson and Wehner are not ones to look to for works of genius.
killua| 3.1.11 @ 3:41AM
Flip Converter Mac
Flip Converter Mac is a great mac flip converte mac and is often used on mac os x. This flip converter for mac is a newly-designed for Flip uses to convert flip video on mac os and convert flip hd video to mainstream video and audio formats supported by various portable players on mac. Therefore, it is a qualified flip hd video converter mac.
Flip Video Converter
Flip Video Converter is definitely the best choice for you to convert Flip video to other formats and edit the video as you like. The output formats it can support are like, 3GP, AVI, DV, FLV, MKV, MPG, MOV, RM, RMVB, SWF, WMV, etc. So you can use this advanced Flip Video Converter to convert your recorded video to many popular players, including, Apple TV, BlackBerry, Creative Zen, Gphone, Mobile Phone, PSP, Zune, iPhone, iPod, and iRiver....