The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

The Spectacle Blog

15 Minutes Are Up

Thanks to the likes of Howard Kurtz, Christopher Buckley today enjoyed 15 minutes of victimhood fame. It does seem fatuous to depict him a victim of right-wing intolerance after he demonstratively announced he’ll be voting for Obama. Why no such stunt back when he gave money to Ron Paul? Be that as it may, Kurtz’s report is as shallow as his subject. Buckley didn’t “lose” his back-page column, but rather was writing it during Mark Steyn’s absence. Yes, his father endorsed Joe Lieberman, but at the expense of the unpleasant RINO, Lowell Weicker. But one needs to go no further about Buckley’s usefulness to the left than E.J. Dionne’s citing Buckley’s invoking of his father’s words to excuse his own turn to Obama: “You know, I’ve spent my entire lifetime separating the right from the kooks.” You know, the very pro-McCain voters whom Dionne depicts as forces of “fear, xenophobia, racism and anger.”

For some genuine insight into the Christopher-NR flap, read these comments that a friend sent me:

WFB’s endorsement of Allard Lowenstein is a better example than backing Lieberman over Weicker. I think the whole flap reflects poorly on everyone involved. Buckley’s endorsement of Obama was poorly reasoned, self-absorbed, and self-indulgent, a (successful) attention-grabbing maneuver by an unserious person. It’s more reflective of Buckley’s class and in-group prejudices than any high principle. Plus, when you insult a group of readers it is hard to feel sorry for you when it generates hate mail.

But I don’t see why NR felt the need to accept his “resignation.” It was something that was obviously going to blow over and Buckley is, for all his faults as political non-thinker, a talented writer. Are we really in such bad shape we can’t tolerate a prodigal son (perhaps in reverse) in our midst? Is severing their last surviving connection to the Buckley legacy something worth doing for McCain? However much righties imagine themselves to be in the tank for McCain, they should have no illusions he’ll be in the tank for them/us.

The whole thing, like so much of what passes for American political debate today, is pathetic.

View all comments (5) |

John Pryor| 10.17.08 @ 8:44AM

This isn't just endorsing a left-leaning candidate for senator, it's endorsing the most liberal member of the senate for the presidency -- which, combined with a democratic majority in the house and senate, would create the most liberal executive and legislative government since the New Deal. Christopher Buckley is a self-serving clown whose only motive in this was to draw attention to himself and a newly published book.

Abu Nudnik| 10.17.08 @ 4:10PM

"This isn’t just endorsing a left-leaning candidate for senator, it’s endorsing the most liberal member of the senate for the presidency...

"Christopher Buckley is a self-serving clown whose only motive in this was to draw attention to himself and a newly published book." (John Pryor)

But Obama is not just liberal: he's Socialist at the very least. I defy you to find a single sincere word from Obama that is not either an noncommittal cliché or outright Marxist victim ideology that feeds on resentment, envy and hate. Colonialism, "spreading the wealth around" ("property is theft"), "white greed," etcetera.

More Blog Posts by Wlady Pleszczynski

http://spectator.org/blog/2008/10/15/15-minutes-are-up

ADVERTISEMENT

SPONSORED LINKS

FLASHBACK TO: 1995

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Obama and the IRS: The Smoking Gun?

Jeffrey Lord | 5.20.13

The Inoperative Jay Carney

Jeffrey Lord | 5.23.13

Holding AWOL Obama Accountable

Betsy McCaughey | 5.23.13

Obama's Imbroglios

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 5.23.13

Laying Down My Pen

Quin Hillyer | 5.23.13

Lerner's Plea

Ray V. Hartwell | 5.23.13

Time to Go for the Kill

Peter Ferrara | 5.22.13

ADVERTISEMENT