The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
The Largest Selection of Liberal-baiting Merchandise on the Net!
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email

AmSpecBlog

15 Minutes Are Up

Thanks to the likes of Howard Kurtz, Christopher Buckley today enjoyed 15 minutes of victimhood fame. It does seem fatuous to depict him a victim of right-wing intolerance after he demonstratively announced he'll be voting for Obama. Why no such stunt back when he gave money to Ron Paul? Be that as it may, Kurtz's report is as shallow as his subject. Buckley didn't "lose" his back-page column, but rather was writing it during Mark Steyn's absence. Yes, his father endorsed Joe Lieberman, but at the expense of the unpleasant RINO, Lowell Weicker. But one needs to go no further about Buckley's usefulness to the left than E.J. Dionne's citing Buckley's invoking of his father's words to excuse his own turn to Obama: "You know, I've spent my entire lifetime separating the right from the kooks." You know, the very pro-McCain voters whom Dionne depicts as forces of "fear, xenophobia, racism and anger."

For some genuine insight into the Christopher-NR flap, read these comments that a friend sent me:

WFB's endorsement of Allard Lowenstein is a better example than backing Lieberman over Weicker. I think the whole flap reflects poorly on everyone involved. Buckley's endorsement of Obama was poorly reasoned, self-absorbed, and self-indulgent, a (successful) attention-grabbing maneuver by an unserious person. It's more reflective of Buckley's class and in-group prejudices than any high principle. Plus, when you insult a group of readers it is hard to feel sorry for you when it generates hate mail.

But I don't see why NR felt the need to accept his "resignation." It was something that was obviously going to blow over and Buckley is, for all his faults as political non-thinker, a talented writer. Are we really in such bad shape we can't tolerate a prodigal son (perhaps in reverse) in our midst? Is severing their last surviving connection to the Buckley legacy something worth doing for McCain? However much righties imagine themselves to be in the tank for McCain, they should have no illusions he'll be in the tank for them/us.

The whole thing, like so much of what passes for American political debate today, is pathetic.

Comments

Mrs. Jackson| 10.15.08 @ 8:48PM

Harumpf. Sorry. I'm having a bit of a hard time swallowing the idea that this Buckley brouhaha would have just all blown over. Christopher Buckley's endorsement of Obama might have blown over had he the courage to borrow a page from his father (pun intended) and done it on the back page of NR. Also if he had kept his disdain of Republicans who do not think as he does, down to a professional simmer, he might have with his increasingly diminishing boyish good looks have pulled it off. But no, as RET used to always say about the Clintons, Boy Buckley was too clever by half when he cast his lot with Ms. Brown's Beast. It was beastly of him to do it. Hats off to Lowry. That could not have been easy for him.

John Pryor| 10.17.08 @ 8:44AM

This isn't just endorsing a left-leaning candidate for senator, it's endorsing the most liberal member of the senate for the presidency -- which, combined with a democratic majority in the house and senate, would create the most liberal executive and legislative government since the New Deal. Christopher Buckley is a self-serving clown whose only motive in this was to draw attention to himself and a newly published book.

Abu Nudnik| 10.17.08 @ 4:10PM

"This isn’t just endorsing a left-leaning candidate for senator, it’s endorsing the most liberal member of the senate for the presidency...

"Christopher Buckley is a self-serving clown whose only motive in this was to draw attention to himself and a newly published book." (John Pryor)

But Obama is not just liberal: he's Socialist at the very least. I defy you to find a single sincere word from Obama that is not either an noncommittal cliché or outright Marxist victim ideology that feeds on resentment, envy and hate. Colonialism, "spreading the wealth around" ("property is theft"), "white greed," etcetera.

Leave a Comment

ADVERTISEMENT

Are you in a mob?

The Democrats say Obamacare opponents are a mob. Are they right?

         

Participating in this survey will subscribe you to the American Spectator email newsletter. You may unsubscribe at any time.

Members to Watch

Philip Klein

* * * *

The 39 Democrats Who Voted "No"

Philip Klein

* * * *

Pelosi's Pyrrhic Victory?

Philip Klein

* * * *

Pro-Life Amendment Passes Easily

Philip Klein

* * * *

The Stupak Amendment

W. James Antle, III

* * * *

One Step Forward, Two Races Back

George Neumayr

* * * *

Divisive Unanimity

Daniel J. Flynn

* * * *

Joe Wilson, Call Your Office

Larry Thornberry

* * * *

ACORN's Big Spender

Matthew Vadum

* * * *

The Spirit of 1989

Doug Bandow

* * * *

The Somali-Kenya Connection

George H. Wittman

* * * *

Tex Mess

William Murchison

* * * *

Feeding the Beast

Philip Klein

* * * *
ADVERTISEMENT