Domestic terrorism, from Roland Emmerich -- and it's a shameless
blockbuster.
Not, I hope, to seem toomuch devoted to my one of
my pop-cultural hobbyhorses, but the attraction of apocalypse
movies to a mass audience seems to me to be essentially the same
as the attraction of superhero movies. Both, that is, are forms
of power fantasy designed to appeal to the younger -- and,
increasingly, older -- adolescents for whom Hollywood movies are
now made by satisfying the urge to be rid both of their feelings
of weakness in relation to the adult world and their sense of
helplessness under the crushing burden of the past. In Roland
Emmerich's2012the frisson of excitement
as we watch the collapse and utter destruction of the Washington
Monument, the Vatican, the White House and (as you will have seen
on the posters) the Art DecoCristo Redentorthat overlooks Rio de Janeiro cannot be unrelated to a
general sense of relief at seeing the symbols of Western
civilization at last deprived by raw nature of their power to
intimidate.
If the monuments of other cultures than our own may be supposed
to suffer a similar fate in the global cataclysm the German-born
Mr. Emmerich so enjoys imagining, we don't get to see
themgoing down. But, then, Arab or Chinese or
African youths presumably wouldn't feel quite the same liberating
effect that our own do on seeing the glories of the past washed
away by gigantic tsunamis. Mr. Emmerich has exploited this vision
of hobbledehoy heaven before in movies likeIndependence DayandThe Day After
Tomorrow, so he has plenty of experience with the
formulae for cinematic apocalypse. He just has to put together
the destruction of all that history-book bunk with some
conspiracy theory and a few isolated nerds with an interest in
non-Christian prophecy who know the truth but are regarded as
crazy by the rest of the world. "We Were Warned" is the movie's
tagline -- though I don't remember being warned ofthis.
The final element of the formula is an incongruous sentimentality
about a broken family's being drawn together again by their
efforts to escape the general doom. John Cusack plays Jackson
Curtis, or possibly Curtis Jackson, author of a widely
disregarded book about Atlantis that in some vague way may or may
not be among the alleged warnings. Jackson is a divorced dad
whose efforts to rescue his two young children (Liam James and
Morgan Lily) from the fate of 99 percent of the earth's
population generously takes in both his ex-wife (Amanda Peet) and
her new husband (Tom McCarthy), the chances of whose sudden
removal from the scene are obviously excellent. The result caters
to the childish wish to be free and powerful at the same time
that one is contained and nurtured. And the boy also gets to help
dad save a fifth of the post-Apocalyptic world's population by
being disobedient. No wonder 2012did $65 million
of business on its opening weekend, a preponderance of that
immense sum having come from those whose discretionary income
comes in the form of an allowance.
The formula is also meant to remind those who like to be thought
of as "media savvy" that this is, like so many others these days,
essentially a movie about movies -- which is why it comes as no
surprise when we are told that its geological Armageddon is
"going to start in Hollywood." This is one of many little
in-jokes -- like having an Arnold Schwarzenegger lookalike on TV
reassuring the people of California that all is under control as
the hero says: "The guy's an actor; he's reading from a script."
Who cares that Governor Schwarzenegger will be out of office in
2012? This kind of thing also helps to remind us of the formula,
since we know that, in the movies, conspiracy-theorists are as
often right as they are often wrong in real life. Where would we
be without such classic lines of the genre as this: "All our
scientific advances, all our modern machines, but the Mayans saw
this coming thousands of years ago."
Likewise, Oliver Platt's de factopolitical leader
of the small remnant of Americans -- after Danny Glover's saintly
President goes willingly to share the fate of the rest of his
people -- muses wonderingly: "The nut bags with their cardboard
signs had it right all along" That's the classic paradigm of the
Hollywood holocaust and a necessary precondition for making a
hero of the high school nerd, now a grown up but girlfriendless
geologist, Adrian (Chiwetel Ejiofor). No prizes for guessing the
purpose of Thandie Newton as the daughter of the martyred
president, now that, in spite of Adrian's warnings, almost the
whole world has been wiped out. The clichés of situation and
dialogue help to reinforce our sense that the allegedly
spectacular computer-generated imagery of collapsing skyscrapers,
bucking and heaving mountain ranges or the Pacific Plate's
cracking loose along the San Andreas fault and tipping into the
ocean like a cascade of giant ice cubes are by now clichés as
well. The latter may not have been portrayed before, but the
technology of the kid-movie made it inevitable that it would be
sooner or later.
This movie's politics are adolescent too, though of course that's
no liability these days, given that our national politics are
also dominated by fantasy. The oriental wisdom of the Chinese
grandma who agrees to take on the party containing our heroes
when they are stranded in the Himalayas about sums it up: "We are
all children of the Earth. We will take them all." This
prefigures the same decision, after the urgings of hero Adrian on
the TV monitor in his Chinese-built ark. "The moment when we stop
fighting for each other, that's when we lose our humanity," he
says. "Everybody out there has died in vain if we start our
future with an act of cruelty." Remind you of anything? Of
course, everyone advises that opening the gates of the ark to the
locals who are understandably unhappy to have been excluded will
lead to disaster but, equally of course, it doesn't. As in
Obamaland, it seems, politics never presents us with any hard
choices. Being nice and kind and moral and unselfish comes
without any cost -- at least to our heroes.
For what it's worth, parents ought to be aware that allowing
their children to attend the latest propaganda effort on behalf
of such fashionable one-worldism will also expose them to a
certain amount of -- mostly implicit -- anti-Americanism. The
collapse of the Washington Monument, along with so much else,
doesn't come untinged with malice. It's also interesting that the
land of "can-do" only a generation or so ago is now more like the
"pitiful helpless giant" of Richard Nixon's nightmare. When the
remnant of humanity -- and a Noah's ark sampling of animals --
has to be herded into movie's own, apocalypse-proof arks, it's
Chinese engineering, not American, that proves equal to the task.
"Leave it to the Chinese," says somebody. "I didn't think we
could do it in the time available." That sounds to me like a
self-fulfilling prophecy. For a start, all our best technical
talent has given up working on military hardware and is now
concentrating on computer-generated imagery.
About the Author
James Bowman, our movie and culture critic, is a resident scholar at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. He is the author of Honor: A History and Media Madness: The Corruption of Our Political Culture, both published by Encounter Books.
I read Lucifers Hammer years ago, in which a giant asteroid
smashes into the Pacific Ocean and predictable trouble happens.
One thing I remember was a man whose response was joy. He was,
you see, just about to be caught in a Madoff-type scheme, and now
he was safe.
Back in May I lost my job and one thing I took comfort in was all
the crapola that I would now not have to do.
There is no great loss, said Granny, without some small gain.
Bydand76| 11.24.09 @ 7:23AM
That was agreat book.
Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle.
They wrote Footfall as well.
That was about the elephant like aliens who smash some asteroids
into our planet to make it more adaptable for their own
enviroment.
Hmmmmm.
Bill H| 11.24.09 @ 9:25AM
In Footfall, the aliens used the asteroids to "soften us up"
during the invasion.
The best part of the book was when the environmentalist character
realized that development of (space) technology was the only way
to "save the planet" and ends up drowning the reporter who was
going to break the story of the atomic bomb powered space
battleship to fight the aliens in a toilet.
Appleby| 11.24.09 @ 9:38AM
Larry Niven can't write characters for sour apples, but his
science and engineering take on disaster is fascinating. Although
the little scene in Lucifer's Hammer in which he shows
ghettomeisters looting White neighourhoods and just piling up the
haul of loot when the asteroid strikes ....
Other examples of irony: Brave New World assumes that Indian
Reservations will still be sinkholes no matter what the rest of
the world becomes; and Arthur C. Clarke's book 2081, purporting
to predict the world 100 years from the date he wrote it, assumes
that the African continent will still be a pesthole. (Of course
he also assumes that people will still consider a deep tan to be
a mark of wealth and leisure, and that everyone will smoke.)
Tim| 11.24.09 @ 11:35AM
What were the aliens doing in the toilet?
Adam Smith| 11.25.09 @ 3:09AM
Read them both as well and enjoyed them.
Just wish they were about 5oo pages longer. Decent sci fi is hard
to come by.
Bydand76| 11.25.09 @ 5:29AM
Yeah I agree,
Good Sci Fi is getting harder to find and it seems that they
always develop into some type of super mega series where if you
dont start at the beginning you are totally lost as to whats
going on.
Another really good book by LN and JP was Legacy of Herot.
Although it wasnt a disaster theme and more of a monster type
aliens book it was really good.
The Mote in Gods Eye was by far their best effort though. The
sequel "The Gripping hand wasnt as good but still there best to
date. The story and the Aliens were really well thought out!
Really good storytelling.
Cpm| 11.24.09 @ 9:36AM
I Was Warned - not to see this movie the first time I saw the
trailer.
Howard| 11.24.09 @ 10:17AM
It seems that Emmerich's movies get worse each time a new one is
released. I thought that Independence Day was fun. Godzilla and
The Day After Tomorrow were garbage. I wonder if there is a scene
in this new movie of a Golden Retriever barely escaping some
calamity. Nothing like being Politically Correct and reusing
things such as ideas.
Speedbump| 11.24.09 @ 10:47AM
Howard, I agree with you...while Independence Day had holes you
could drive a Mack truck through, I could still enjoy the
movie...since then his movies have gotten to the point where 2012
was an insult to my intelligence...I was warned, but I went to
see it anyway...
Tim| 11.24.09 @ 11:38AM
According to one review I read, the Golden Retriever in 2012 is a
chicken.
Brian B| 11.24.09 @ 10:40AM
--If the monuments of other cultures than our own may be
supposed to suffer a similar fate in the global cataclysm the
German-born Mr. Emmerich so enjoys imagining, we don't get to see
them going down. But, then, Arab or Chinese or African youths
presumably wouldn't feel quite the same liberating effect that
our own do on seeing the glories of the past washed away by
gigantic tsunamis.--
The reality is a little more prosaic, at least regarding the
Religion of Peace.
Mr. Emmerich and his head writer, after considering the portrayal
of the destruction of Mecca, decided prudence was the better part
of valor in avoiding a fatwa on their brave, calculating
heads.
Blowing up cristo is safe and lucrative (at least in
this life).
Alas their art apparently isn't quite worth blowing up the Kaaba.
Clintidote| 11.24.09 @ 10:53PM
When some director finally destroys Mecca, I'll cough up the
movie cash to see it. It's long past time for Allah and his
defective death cult to die.
There's your sequel, Roland - get on it.
Seek| 11.24.09 @ 11:48AM
Oh, lay back and enjoy the astounding CGI effects. It's only a
movie, for Christ's sake (not Muhammed's though).
The German-born Emmerich did "The Patriot," starring Mel Gibson,
did he not? Would an anti-American do that? Yeesh.
Tim| 11.24.09 @ 2:10PM
Truly. A more plausible plot might involve the destruction of
America by an avalanche of debt, but there'd be no cool CGI
stuff.
Emmerich did Stargate and Independence Day, so his sci-fi bona
fides are impeccable.
Jack Olson| 11.24.09 @ 2:52PM
I never thought of it before, but Bowman has pointed out a
strange fact. Many recent disaster movies do involve broken up
families. I cite "Day After Tomorrow", "Dante's Peak", "Deep
Impact", "Twister" and the "War of the Worlds" remake which
starred Tom Cruise. I have seen four productions of the sinking
of the Titanic. All but the Nazi German one (yes, they made one)
included subplots of adultery or at least unfaithful lovers like
the one played by Kate Winslet. I recognize that a disaster movie
can't just star the earthquake, volcano or meteor. The drama of
the Titanic sinking is about the people who live and die, not the
ship. But, it does surprise me how many of the subplots involve
divorced people. I guess it's easier to write a dramatic subplot
about divorced people than married ones.
Carpenter| 11.24.09 @ 3:00PM
Since I don't pretend to any intellect, I don't have to argue the
merits of Ingmar Bergman films, and prefer lightweight Woody
Allen Bergman parodies like "Love and Death". But there is
something distinctly brain-numbing about heavy reliance on CGI in
films today. Maybe it started with the blue screens of "Star
Wars" so long ago and far away, but moviegoers seem unable to
enjoy a film with dialogue or more than a millisecond of
inaction. Nothing that can be imagined is now impossible to film,
thanks to CGI, and wonderful, thought provoking films like
"Two-Lane Blacktop", "Aguirre, Wrath of God" or even "Garden
State" scarcely have a chance despite their low budgets.
Too bad...
According to one review I read, the Golden Retriever in 2012 is a
chicken.
Tony in Central PA | 11.25.09 @ 12:44PM
Yup, the Mayans saw it coming. We should trust their judgment.
Why don't we start cutting out the still- beating hearts of
people to avert this cataclysm ?
BK| 11.26.09 @ 3:31AM
We already do that, it is called abortion. Boy, we really know
how to learn from history. And will the USA go the way of the
Mayans?
Donald Niedospial| 11.25.09 @ 1:50PM
In Roland Emmerich's 2012 he took joy in destroying the symbols
of Christianity in the film. He refused to destroy any islamic
religious sites because he didn't want to offend the terrorists.
I don't think God will follow his hollywood script?
Rich Rostrom| 11.25.09 @ 6:55PM
Tony in Central PA: The Mayans sacrificed their victims by
drowning them in "sacred wells". It was the Aztecs who practiced
instant cardiectomy.
thanks you very much for
This movie's politics are adolescent too, though of course that's
no liability these days, given that our national politics are
also dominated by fantasy.
I read Lucifers Hammer years ago, in which a giant asteroid
smashes into the Pacific Ocean and predictable trouble happens.
One thing I remember was a man whose response was joy. He was,
you see, just about to be caught in a Madoff-type scheme, and now
he was safe.
Back in May I lost my job and one thing I took comfort in was all
the crapola that I would now not have to do.
There is no great loss, said Granny, without some small gain.
Review HDTV
jan zisn| 6.10.10 @ 8:55PM
OH,the same spilling of blood, the same stench of death, the same
arrogant, cruel and brutal taking of life.” Landlord
insights,seo, indeed
I am with clothes, you're doing great, shanghaimassage ,we can make extra food
available for humans that, properly distributed, would eliminate
starvation and malnutrition from this planet.
Appleby| 11.24.09 @ 7:03AM
I read Lucifers Hammer years ago, in which a giant asteroid smashes into the Pacific Ocean and predictable trouble happens. One thing I remember was a man whose response was joy. He was, you see, just about to be caught in a Madoff-type scheme, and now he was safe.
Back in May I lost my job and one thing I took comfort in was all the crapola that I would now not have to do.
There is no great loss, said Granny, without some small gain.
Bydand76| 11.24.09 @ 7:23AM
That was agreat book.
Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle.
They wrote Footfall as well.
That was about the elephant like aliens who smash some asteroids into our planet to make it more adaptable for their own enviroment.
Hmmmmm.
Bill H| 11.24.09 @ 9:25AM
In Footfall, the aliens used the asteroids to "soften us up" during the invasion.
The best part of the book was when the environmentalist character realized that development of (space) technology was the only way to "save the planet" and ends up drowning the reporter who was going to break the story of the atomic bomb powered space battleship to fight the aliens in a toilet.
Appleby| 11.24.09 @ 9:38AM
Larry Niven can't write characters for sour apples, but his science and engineering take on disaster is fascinating. Although the little scene in Lucifer's Hammer in which he shows ghettomeisters looting White neighourhoods and just piling up the haul of loot when the asteroid strikes ....
Other examples of irony: Brave New World assumes that Indian Reservations will still be sinkholes no matter what the rest of the world becomes; and Arthur C. Clarke's book 2081, purporting to predict the world 100 years from the date he wrote it, assumes that the African continent will still be a pesthole. (Of course he also assumes that people will still consider a deep tan to be a mark of wealth and leisure, and that everyone will smoke.)
Tim| 11.24.09 @ 11:35AM
What were the aliens doing in the toilet?
Adam Smith| 11.25.09 @ 3:09AM
Read them both as well and enjoyed them.
Just wish they were about 5oo pages longer. Decent sci fi is hard to come by.
Bydand76| 11.25.09 @ 5:29AM
Yeah I agree,
Good Sci Fi is getting harder to find and it seems that they always develop into some type of super mega series where if you dont start at the beginning you are totally lost as to whats going on.
Another really good book by LN and JP was Legacy of Herot. Although it wasnt a disaster theme and more of a monster type aliens book it was really good.
The Mote in Gods Eye was by far their best effort though. The sequel "The Gripping hand wasnt as good but still there best to date. The story and the Aliens were really well thought out!
Really good storytelling.
Cpm| 11.24.09 @ 9:36AM
I Was Warned - not to see this movie the first time I saw the trailer.
Howard| 11.24.09 @ 10:17AM
It seems that Emmerich's movies get worse each time a new one is released. I thought that Independence Day was fun. Godzilla and The Day After Tomorrow were garbage. I wonder if there is a scene in this new movie of a Golden Retriever barely escaping some calamity. Nothing like being Politically Correct and reusing things such as ideas.
Speedbump| 11.24.09 @ 10:47AM
Howard, I agree with you...while Independence Day had holes you could drive a Mack truck through, I could still enjoy the movie...since then his movies have gotten to the point where 2012 was an insult to my intelligence...I was warned, but I went to see it anyway...
Tim| 11.24.09 @ 11:38AM
According to one review I read, the Golden Retriever in 2012 is a chicken.
Brian B| 11.24.09 @ 10:40AM
--If the monuments of other cultures than our own may be supposed to suffer a similar fate in the global cataclysm the German-born Mr. Emmerich so enjoys imagining, we don't get to see them going down. But, then, Arab or Chinese or African youths presumably wouldn't feel quite the same liberating effect that our own do on seeing the glories of the past washed away by gigantic tsunamis.--
The reality is a little more prosaic, at least regarding the Religion of Peace.
Mr. Emmerich and his head writer, after considering the portrayal of the destruction of Mecca, decided prudence was the better part of valor in avoiding a fatwa on their brave, calculating heads.
Blowing up cristo is safe and lucrative (at least in this life).
Alas their art apparently isn't quite worth blowing up the Kaaba.
Clintidote| 11.24.09 @ 10:53PM
When some director finally destroys Mecca, I'll cough up the movie cash to see it. It's long past time for Allah and his defective death cult to die.
There's your sequel, Roland - get on it.
Seek| 11.24.09 @ 11:48AM
Oh, lay back and enjoy the astounding CGI effects. It's only a movie, for Christ's sake (not Muhammed's though).
The German-born Emmerich did "The Patriot," starring Mel Gibson, did he not? Would an anti-American do that? Yeesh.
Tim| 11.24.09 @ 2:10PM
Truly. A more plausible plot might involve the destruction of America by an avalanche of debt, but there'd be no cool CGI stuff.
PacRim Jim| 11.24.09 @ 1:46PM
Emmerich did Stargate and Independence Day, so his sci-fi bona fides are impeccable.
Jack Olson| 11.24.09 @ 2:52PM
I never thought of it before, but Bowman has pointed out a strange fact. Many recent disaster movies do involve broken up families. I cite "Day After Tomorrow", "Dante's Peak", "Deep Impact", "Twister" and the "War of the Worlds" remake which starred Tom Cruise. I have seen four productions of the sinking of the Titanic. All but the Nazi German one (yes, they made one) included subplots of adultery or at least unfaithful lovers like the one played by Kate Winslet. I recognize that a disaster movie can't just star the earthquake, volcano or meteor. The drama of the Titanic sinking is about the people who live and die, not the ship. But, it does surprise me how many of the subplots involve divorced people. I guess it's easier to write a dramatic subplot about divorced people than married ones.
Carpenter| 11.24.09 @ 3:00PM
Since I don't pretend to any intellect, I don't have to argue the merits of Ingmar Bergman films, and prefer lightweight Woody Allen Bergman parodies like "Love and Death". But there is something distinctly brain-numbing about heavy reliance on CGI in films today. Maybe it started with the blue screens of "Star Wars" so long ago and far away, but moviegoers seem unable to enjoy a film with dialogue or more than a millisecond of inaction. Nothing that can be imagined is now impossible to film, thanks to CGI, and wonderful, thought provoking films like "Two-Lane Blacktop", "Aguirre, Wrath of God" or even "Garden State" scarcely have a chance despite their low budgets.
Too bad...
stargate worlds naquadah | 11.24.09 @ 8:59PM
According to one review I read, the Golden Retriever in 2012 is a chicken.
Tony in Central PA | 11.25.09 @ 12:44PM
Yup, the Mayans saw it coming. We should trust their judgment. Why don't we start cutting out the still- beating hearts of people to avert this cataclysm ?
BK| 11.26.09 @ 3:31AM
We already do that, it is called abortion. Boy, we really know how to learn from history. And will the USA go the way of the Mayans?
Donald Niedospial| 11.25.09 @ 1:50PM
In Roland Emmerich's 2012 he took joy in destroying the symbols of Christianity in the film. He refused to destroy any islamic religious sites because he didn't want to offend the terrorists. I don't think God will follow his hollywood script?
Rich Rostrom| 11.25.09 @ 6:55PM
Tony in Central PA: The Mayans sacrificed their victims by drowning them in "sacred wells". It was the Aztecs who practiced instant cardiectomy.
Mandarin Chinese Online| 11.28.09 @ 5:07AM
nothing is impossible to a willing heart!
electronic| 11.30.09 @ 4:20AM
nothing is impossible to a willing heart!
kolef| 4.7.10 @ 1:43AM
thanks you very much for
This movie's politics are adolescent too, though of course that's no liability these days, given that our national politics are also dominated by fantasy.
Poptropica
Poptropica
samsung| 4.11.10 @ 6:32PM
LED PLUS Technology / 1920×1080 / 120Hz TruMotion / 5,000,000:1 contrast / NetCast Entertainment Access Non-slip Gripper Strap Samsung UN46C6300 46-Inch 1080p 120 Hz LED HDTV Street tough hardware YKK Zipper 3 Pockets Not machine washable Made in the USA LG 55LE5500 55-Inch 1080p 120Hz LED Plus LCD HDTV
hrty| 4.15.10 @ 1:25AM
Mont Blanc replica
mulberry purse
Jeniffer| 4.15.10 @ 6:43AM
Now it is easy to buy or renew a SSL Certificats from SSLMatrix.com
Jenny Brady| 4.16.10 @ 12:51AM
Warning Tape
Caution Tape
Jill| 4.24.10 @ 11:48PM
sauna health
rety| 4.27.10 @ 5:44AM
ArenaBetting.com dukung fair play FIFA world cup AFSEL 2010
dunia pewayangan
dacha| 5.9.10 @ 8:39AM
I read Lucifers Hammer years ago, in which a giant asteroid smashes into the Pacific Ocean and predictable trouble happens. One thing I remember was a man whose response was joy. He was, you see, just about to be caught in a Madoff-type scheme, and now he was safe.
Back in May I lost my job and one thing I took comfort in was all the crapola that I would now not have to do.
There is no great loss, said Granny, without some small gain. Review HDTV
jan zisn| 6.10.10 @ 8:55PM
OH,the same spilling of blood, the same stench of death, the same arrogant, cruel and brutal taking of life.” Landlord insights,seo, indeed I am with clothes, you're doing great, shanghaimassage ,we can make extra food available for humans that, properly distributed, would eliminate starvation and malnutrition from this planet.
出会い| 7.21.11 @ 3:50AM
itumomiteimasu
werttyt| 1.11.12 @ 3:14AM
good