A former colleague recalls the Bulgarian ex-Communist recently named, with Obama administration backing, to head this key UN agency.
In the race for the post of Director-General of the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Irina Bokova, Bulgaria’s obscure and rather uninspiring candidate, surprisingly defeated the better-known Egyptian painter and culture minister Farouk Hosny. Jewish groups campaigned heavily against the Egyptian candidate who got into trouble over a careless threat he made last year — after militant Islamic deputies in Egypt’s parliament had complained that the Library of Alexandria under his supervision was full of Jewish books — to burn any such books he could find there (an insensitive, even anti-Semitic remark he later apologized for). It is not clear whether it was this controversy that swayed Obama’s State Department to shift its support away from Hosny, who seemed to have been the candidate favored by the Bush Administration, and back Ms. Bokova instead.
But who is this Irina Bokova, who will become the first woman and first East European to lead this pivotal U.N. agency in charge of promoting international cooperation in education, science, and culture? Bokova, the 57-year-old privileged daughter of a once powerful propaganda bigwig in Communist Bulgaria, had received her bachelor’s degree from the Moscow Institute for International Relations in 1976. She had been twice elected a member of the post-Communist National Assembly and served briefly as Bulgaria’s foreign minister in 1996-1997. She even ran unsuccessfully for vice-president in 1996 on the ticket of the Bulgarian Socialist (ex-Communist) Party. But when I first met her in the fall of 1982, Irina Kolarova (as she was then known) had just been appointed third secretary at the Bulgarian Mission to the U.N. in New York, where she worked mainly in the General Assembly’s Third (Human Rights) Committee. Beneath her unassuming exterior, she was a tough and loyal Communist apparatchik. But her stay in New York was cut short after the State Department rejected for nearly two years the accreditation of her journalist-husband, Liubomir Kolarov, most likely because of his known association with Communist Bulgaria’s spy agency, the DS.
Another reason for her early recall may have been an extramarital affair she was having with her colleague and current husband, Kalin Mitrev, the mission’s then unhappily-married second secretary. Their liaison was kept secret for a while, probably because Kalin’s father was another Communist big shot, but it came out into the open early one evening when a crowd of concerned New Yorkers gathered outside the mission’s residential building in Manhattan’s Upper East Side. It turned out that Irina’s heavy-drinking husband had been dangling from their 11th floor apartment’s balcony, trying in vain to jump onto the balcony of the floor below (where Kalin resided at the time without his sickly wife and two young daughters), obviously in an attempt to catch the two love birds in flagrante delicto.
After my defection in July 1988, I nearly came into contact with Irina again in early 1990, when Irina, accompanied by her teenage son and daughter, attended for six months the University of Maryland’s School of Public Affairs as a Ford Foundation fellow. She had just gone back to Bulgaria, but I met a very close Bulgarian friend of hers, another Ford Foundation fellow at College Park, where I was studying for my graduate degree in political science. Our mutual friend informed me of Irina’s miraculous transformation from a devout old-guard Communist into a post-Communist “democrat,” as she seems to have abandoned her strongly-held Communist views. According to her friend, Irina was divorcing her ever-inebriated husband and was planning to wed Kalin, who was separated from his wife. In another sign of the changing times, Irina was also on the verge of tearing up her Communist party card, like all other Soviet-educated Communist diplomats who now wanted to turn themselves into politically unaffiliated foreign-service professionals (in order to keep their sinecure jobs). In another surprise, she had befriended a well-connected American professor named Madeleine Albright (the future Secretary of State in Bill Clinton’s second term). After Irina had accosted Albright at one of the latter’s public lectures, the two became close friends. Strange, because the Irina I knew would have never approached any American “bourgeois” academic, let alone allow her to become her bosom friend and mentor.
When the Socialists (ex-Communists) recaptured Bulgaria’s presidency and premiership several years ago, Irina was appointed Bulgaria’s ambassador to France and permanent representative to UNESCO. She is now married to her old flame Kalin, Bulgaria’s current representative-director in the London-headquartered European Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Then last December, she announced her seemingly most unpromising candidacy for UNESCO’s top job. She won in a very tight race, when UNESCO Executive Board voted 31-27 in her favor during the final, 5th round of voting (her election must still be approved by a conference of all UNESCO members opening October 15 in Paris). In an attempt to smooth over any hurt feelings over the rejection of the Arab world’s candidate for UNESCO’s top job, Bokova has since promised to tour the Arab countries. She has even spoken out in defense of Roman Polanski, the famous Polish French movie director detained in Switzerland and threatened with extradition back to the U.S. to face the music in a 32-year-old “statutory rape” case.
It is not entirely clear what led to her unlikely election, but what concerns me most is just how ill-prepared Irina Bokova really is for the tough top spot at this important and once politically troubled international organization (which the U.S. and the U.K. had quit in protest in 1984 for the next twenty years or so), considering her background as a mediocre ex-Communist bureaucrat. Even though I believe that her election is sending the wrong message to the post-Communist part of the world, I sincerely hope that her record as UNESCO head will not be as checkered as her past.
ADVERTISEMENT
SPONSORED LINKS
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
Ken (Old Texican)| 10.5.09 @ 10:44AM
I have tried to be patient, but I have finally given up on the UN...........totally.
I believe very strongly we should build a United Democratic Assembly of nations, and begin shifting all of our contributions there as it comes up to speed.
Why continue to divide huge chunks of OUR money among dictators and thugs?
Kurt| 10.5.09 @ 1:30PM
Sounds Great...Until you realize that this too will become full of self serving political dignitaries full of arrogance and hubris filled adgendas, ultimately ending in folly. Unless of course you believe history won't repeat itself. The answer-if there is one-is to protect ourselves first, and then help countries in peril. To hell with any of this Wilsonian world alliances-unless you want a 'world' government.
Faffnir| 10.5.09 @ 12:51PM
The UN was founded as a way to further Soviet aims and intentions in the post WWII world. It is my considered opinion the this country should abandon that useless home for thugs, dicators and general mediocrities and pursue our own self-interest with brusque confidence. If any democracy decides it is in their self-interest to join us, they should be welcomed. But they should be required to share the burdens, unlike our "allies" in Afghanistan who blanche at the thought of their troops actually engaging in anything like combat. The organisation should be invited to decamp for the more hospitable climes or any country who would support such a useless shell.
Elle| 10.5.09 @ 9:47PM
Faffnir you have said it all brilliantly!!!!!!!!
yanshen| 10.6.09 @ 1:36AM
you may also be interested in
A Familiar "New Face" at UNESCO1
A Familiar "New Face" at UNESCO2
Yosemeti Sam| 10.6.09 @ 11:20AM
The rhyme that must be remembered - birds of
a feather flock together! Nuff said!
Marc Jeric| 10.6.09 @ 6:32PM
UNESCO head - a friend of Albright? Why am I not surprised?
Richard Baker| 10.6.09 @ 7:25PM
She's an ex-Communist? That's new at the UN? Close the Politburo at Turtle Bay and send them to the gloriousness of Harare, Zimbabwe. Or is it Ulan Bator, Mongolia? I forget which.