By Matthew Vadum on 9.18.08 @ 12:08AM
The costs of doing the mainstream media's job.
With few exceptions, the mainstream media has fallen down on the
job covering the meteoric rise of Senator Barack Obama, so when
every once in a while a journalist takes an honest, critical look
at Obama, people who believe in the democratic process should
welcome the discussion. But instead of welcoming the opportunity,
the Obama campaign tries to suppress legitimate debate by engaging
in Leninist political theater.
If Obama has nothing to hide, what's he so afraid of?
The campaign's Obama Action Wire tried to drown out
investigative journalist David Freddoso who wrote the New York
Times bestseller, The Case Against Barack Obama, when he
appeared September 15 on "Extension 720," a Chicago radio show.
The Obama campaign sent out an emergency "Obama Wire Alert" to
supporters, urging them to stir up trouble for Freddoso, whose book
is now number 5 on the Times' bestseller list (hardcover
nonfiction), the Chicago Tribune's blog, The Swamp,
reports. "The author of the latest anti-Barack
hit book is appearing on WGN Radio in the Chicagoland market
tonight, and your help is urgently needed to make sure his baseless
lies don't gain credibility," the political all-points bulletin
read.
"David Freddoso has made a career off dishonest, extreme hate
mongering," the email claimed. "And WGN apparently thinks this
card-carrying member of the right-wing smear machine needs a bigger
platform for his lies and smears about Barack Obama -- on the
public airwaves."
ANYONE WHO KNOWS David Freddoso knows this is a vicious libel. The
hard-driving Freddoso, a veteran of the Evans-Novak Political
Report, has great integrity. Instead of giving credibility to
wild conspiracy theories about Obama (as some in-the-know
conservatives say Jerome Corsi did in The Obama Nation),
he has steadfastly refused to adopt the template that other critics
of Obama have relied on. Specifically, he rejects the Corsi
approach and has earned high praise from commentators such as the
Heritage Foundation's Conn Carroll for taking the high road.
In his book, Freddoso writes that Obama is "the least
experienced politician in at least one hundred years to obtain a
major party nomination for President of the United States," and
that throughout his accomplishment-free political career Obama has
consistently backed the Chicago political machine over genuine
reformers. "He is simply another liberal Democratic politician who
will divide America along the same lines as it has been divided for
decades," Freddoso writes.
Obama is on record supporting the gruesome medical procedure
known as "partial-birth abortion," or as normal people call it,
infanticide. As an Illinois state senator, he insisted that
aborting babies alive and leaving them to die in a cold, dark
closet was a physician's prerogative.
These are all easily verifiable facts, yet the Obama campaign
accuses Freddoso of hate mongering.
Here is the campaign's lead example (from the recent
Obama Action Wire):
Freddoso asks Barack, "How many unrepentant Communist
terrorists do you have as friends?" [p. 126] This question is so
ridiculous it refutes itself. Barack might as well ask Freddoso how
many leprechauns he's friends with.
The campaign pretends it's like the classic loaded question, So
when exactly, senator, did you stop beating your wife? But it's not
a "ridiculous" question and it's telling that the campaign refuses
to answer the question directly.
Evidence has established
that Obama is friends with at least two people with a communist and
terrorist past: William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, formerly of the
Weather Underground. Ayers and Dohrn, the married couple that
helped to launch Obama's political career in 1995, were both
involved in terrorist bombings in the United States. Members of
their cell killed people.
Obama, who has consistently downplayed his relationship with
Ayers and Dohrn, has yet to give a satisfactory public accounting
of why he thought it was no big deal to be friends with these
unrepentant criminals. It is the media's job to keep pressing him,
and that's exactly what Freddoso has been doing.
THE OBAMA CAMPAIGN had the same modus operandi August 27 when it
attempted to mau-mau Freddoso's fellow National Review
writer, Stanley Kurtz, during his appearance on "Extension
720." Kurtz had traveled to the University of Illinois at Chicago
to research the education reform project known as the Chicago
Annenberg Challenge because both Obama and his friend Ayers were
involved in it.
Instead of putting on a campaign spokesman to challenge Kurtz's
arguments, the campaign tried to shut down the show. Obama
supporters inundated the show with telephone calls and picketed
outside the studio. They also called other talk shows and
regurgitated the talking points the campaign fed them.
Radio talk show host Mark Levin launched one of his famous
"Levin surges" after tiring of the rote recitations from Obamabots
on his show's call-in line. Levin read the campaign headquarters
phone number on air and encouraged his listeners to swamp that line
with complaints.
Will Obama Action Wire launch a vendetta against Levin now?
Freddoso has made it clear he thinks it's silly and
counterproductive to wallow in conspiracy theories such as the one
that claims Obama isn't a U.S. citizen, the one that claims he
isn't a Christian, or the one that claims he is some kind of
Manchurian candidate surreptitiously inserted into the presidential
contest by America's enemies.
Without name-calling or innuendo, Freddoso makes the case that
Obama is simply a liberal machine politician, and "not an agent of
hope and change." (See my "Organization Watch" interview from August 26, partial transcript here.)
Freddoso a dishonest, extreme hate monger? Give me a break.
topics:
Education, Barack Obama, Mainstream Media, Abortion, NATO