White House Keeping Record of @POTUS Tweeters | The American Spectator | USA News and Politics
White House Keeping Record of @POTUS Tweeters
by

If you want to register a complaint with the Obama Administration, it’s probably best you air your grievances without directly tagging them in your Tweet.

Unless, of course, you’d like your Tweet logged, preserved and archived for posterity in a searchable database the White House will use to tag Twitter users who make routine comments that are “concerning” to the powers that be.

Case in point? After Barack Obama belatedly joined Twitter on Monday — in his official, presidential capacity — dozens of Twitter denizens began tweeting him sex jokes, threats and other unprintable inanities. (We counted nearly 500 tweets dropping f-bombs at POTUS in the past day.)

But the joke’s actually on them: Not only does the Secret Service already monitor Twitter for threats, but the White House is archiving each and every thing @POTUS tweeters say. Ashley Feinberg flagged this relevant piece of the White House Online Privacy Policy:

On Twitter, the White House automatically archives “tweets” from official White House accounts, “direct messages” sent to or from official White House accounts, and “mentions” (tweets from other users to official White House accounts.

Obviously, this is pretty standard for most social media. After all, the tradeoff for being able to use sites like Twitter and Facebook for free is that they get to use your uploaded content to (1) sell things to you and (2) pinpoint you more directly for advertisers. These sites collect and log all sorts of information, not just what you Tweet or post, but who you are, where you are, what you’re doing and how you’re doing it. 

This is a little creepier, though, since the Secret Service is directly involved. Most people are freer on social media than they would be in real life, and it’s unclear what the Secret Service will consider a “threat” worthy of inclusion in a profile for further use. Drop an f-bomb? That could be considered a threat. Talk about your direct opposition to a program? Well, the White House has been fairly clear that they don’t tolerate those who spread misinformation on social media. Having an “enemies” list is far from out of bounds for even dedicatedly patriotic administrations.

In the meantime, you should probably just refrain from tagging the President directly. It’s way eaiser to whack on Congresspeople, anyway.

Sign Up to receive Our Latest Updates! Register

Notice to Readers: The American Spectator and Spectator World are marks used by independent publishing companies that are not affiliated in any way. If you are looking for The Spectator World please click on the following link: https://thespectator.com/world.

Be a Free Market Loving Patriot. Subscribe Today!