The WSJ somewhat improved its coverage of Obamacare litigation. On Monday I noted here the imbalanced way it treated the political pedigree of judges involved. At least this time the same reporter offered, in the ninth paragraph, that “two federal district judges who were Democratic appointees have ruled in the Obama administration’s favor”, after noting that it was a Reagan appointee who heard yesterday’s argument. Maybe she reads AmSpec.
What is it with New York attorneys general? Is there...Read More
Perhaps the biggest lie told in the last 100 years...Read More
Much has been written about the intellectual failings of America’s...Read More