This, via the Atlantic, is probably a first in campaign history. In a Florida state senate race, a new ad charges that, essentially, a statehouse incumbent vying for the seat cares more about robots than people.
“Technology is great. But driverless cars?!?!” an elderly voice exclaims as a totally empty vehicle runs a stop sign in front of an old woman with a walker. “Is this really a priority for our state? Well it was a priority for Jeff Brandes.”
On this one, count me with Mr. Brandes.
Humans are awful, awful drivers. We crash cars at a rate of about 11 million per year. And no wonder: We get distracted, we flip the radio… I’m actually writing this post on my iPhone as I drive to the office. (Just kidding.)
Self-driving cars have the potential to make the roads much safer; to decrease congestion; to increase mobility for the disabled and elderly. Indeed, the Atlantic quotes Brandes’ reaction to the attack: “I thought [the ad] was a little bit bizarre. It’s clearly trying to scare seniors, even though seniors might benefit the most from this technology.”
From what I understand, perhaps the largest barrier to the technology is the liability question. How do you insure a self-driving car? If one does crash, who’s at fault?
Notice to Readers: The American Spectator and Spectator World are marks used by independent publishing companies that are not affiliated in any way. If you are looking for The Spectator World please click on the following link: https://thespectator.com/world.