More on War Powers - The American Spectator | USA News and Politics
More on War Powers
by

Jim: I think we’ve come to the nub of our disagreement. Your central contention, as I understand it, is that wars conducted without congressional authorization were less common in early American history than they have been in recent American history. I just don’t think this argument can be sustained in the face of the historical record. The US Navy spent much of the 19th Century fighting to protect American interests, from China and Sumatra to the Carribean and Mediterranean. You may dismiss most of these skirmishes as “clearly not wars,” but I think that Max Boot’s phrase “small wars” conveys much more accurately what US forces have regularly engaged in from very early on (and Boot’s The Savage Wars of Peace: Small Wars and the Rise of American Power really drives home just how common it has been, starting in the first decade of the 1800s, for US forces to go to battle abroad).

I will say I’m a bit uncomfortable with John Yoo’s assertion that Presidents didn’t need congressional authorization even in many cases where they sought it. Surely an argument based in part on the historical record of how our Constitutional order has worked in practice mustn’t dismiss so much of that record. David Rifkin and Lee Casey make an interesting argument that airstrikes on Libya don’t require congressional approval as a Constitutional matter, but regime change would. I’m not entirely convinced that this is workable as a general principle, but I’m inclined to think it’s a pretty useful one for thinking about the specific case of Libya.

As a matter of policy, I’ve been ambivalent about the war in Libya precisely because of the administration’s caginess about the endgame: Gaddafi’s overthrow is the stated goal of US policy but not the stated goal of the military action. So I think Marco Rubio is right: The Senate should authorize the war, and state plainly that it’s a war to remove Gaddafi.

Sign Up to receive Our Latest Updates! Register

Notice to Readers: The American Spectator and Spectator World are marks used by independent publishing companies that are not affiliated in any way. If you are looking for The Spectator World please click on the following link: https://spectatorworld.com/.

Be a Free Market Loving Patriot. Subscribe Today!

Stop the Inflation Grinch From Stealing Christmas!

That’s right, the Grinch (Joe Biden) is coming for your pocketbooks this Christmas season with record inflation. Just to recap, here is a list of items that have gone up during his reign. 

Gas: 40%+
Beef: 20%+
Used Cars: 20%+
Lodging: 17%
Eggs: 13%

What hasn’t increased? The cost to subscribe to The American Spectator! For a limited time, we are offering our popular yearly subscription for only $49.99. Lock in the lowest price of the year by subscribing today

The Grinch Stole Christmas Sale
Commander-in-chief of Christmas inflation