You have to hand it to John Kerry. Few people have the stick-to-it-iveness of our fair Secretary of State. Say what you want about the man, but when he commits to something, no matter how undeniably stupid, the man stays true to his commitment.
Even in the face of overwhelming evidence that Iran (1) has no intention of signing any sort of nuclear non-proliferation agreement and (2) persists in believing it would be best if the United States was obliterated from the face of the Earth, John Kerry is still trying, desperately, to make friends. He’s like that girl at the slumber party who happily ignores that her training bra ended up in the freezer overnight because she’s so desperate to be included. I almost feel sorry for him, if I wasn’t 100% sure that this is all going to end terribly for either us or our allies (or both).
This weekend, according to reports, John Kerry was chatting up his Iranian counterparts and casually mentioned that, while the United States has a pretty solid form of government, he can’t help but be the teensiest bit jealous that we haven’t yet welcomed a maniacal and moderately fascist supreme leader.
Secretary of State John Kerry told his Iranian counterpart that he wished the United States had a leader more like Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei, according to comments made by a senior Iranian cleric and repeated in the country’s state-run media.
Ayatollah Alam al-Hoda claimed during Friday prayer services in Iran that in negotiations over Tehran’s contested nuclear program, Kerry told the country’s foreign minister that he “wished the U.S. had a leader like Iran’s supreme leader,” according to a Persian-language report on the remarks published by the Asriran news site.
“In the negotiations Kerry told [Iranian Foreign Minister Javad] Zarif that he [Kerry] wished U.S. had a leader like Iran’s supreme leader,” according to Alam al-Hoda, who is a senior member of the Iran’s powerful Assembly of Experts.
If only. Legislation would be so much easier to pass if only we had a complete breakdown of our three branches of government. Think of the things that would get done, then! Our financial system would all but collapse and our people would live under an oppressive rule that oozes into every aspect of their daily lives, but we’d have state-of-the-art 20th century weapons and 15th century family values, right?
Notice to Readers: The American Spectator and Spectator World are marks used by independent publishing companies that are not affiliated in any way. If you are looking for The Spectator World please click on the following link: https://thespectator.com/world.