It seems to happen weekly. I’m having a nice Chardonnay and pizza, sitting across from my wife, when she says:
You know, the most important thing you could do is get out with people. Just going to the Recreation Center where you see people is not the point. They say it’s the most important thing for longevity, getting out and socializing.
I take a sip of wine and brace myself. Because I do socialize. I keep up with old friends on Facebook, chat in group texts, and comment on posts. I exchange emails about real issues (like if gold should replace the U.S. dollar) with people I respect. That’s plenty of social interaction… right?
“No!” she says, “absolutely not! It’s not the same thing!”
I guess I get a little whiny at that point. “No, they’re different by definition, but what is it about chatting online with Alexandra, Donna, Vinay, and Roger that doesn’t increase my longevity, while schmoozing at the senior center does? I mean, there are studies on this.”
She frowns at me. “You could try AA, you know.”
Let’s change the subject. Yes, there are studies. And this is where things get interesting.
Longevity and Social Interaction
For years, research has confirmed that regular social engagement is one of the most powerful predictors of longevity. People with strong social ties live longer, have lower rates of cognitive decline, and even experience reduced inflammation and improved immune function. One of the most famous studies, a meta-analysis of 148 studies involving more than 300,000 participants, found that strong social relationships increase the likelihood of survival by 50 percent — a boost comparable to quitting smoking! This does not mean, however, that social engagement extends life by 50 percent. Instead, it refers to relative risk reduction: individuals with strong social connections had a 50 percent greater likelihood of surviving over a given study period compared with those who were socially isolated.
To clarify still further:
First, this statistic is derived from studies with different age groups, but much of the research focuses on late middle-aged and older adults.
Second, the effect is most pronounced in older individuals (60+), who are at higher risk for health complications linked to loneliness and isolation.
And finally, it means that socially engaged people have a significantly lower risk of premature death from all causes — as is the case with quitting smoking or maintaining a healthy weight.
So, the verdict seems clear: being socially active is as essential for a long, healthy life as are diet and exercise. But here’s where things get a little murky: Does how you socialize matter? I mean, is it what politicians do? Just “pressing the flesh”?
Marriage: Built-in Socialization?
Since I joke about my wife’s insistence that I socialize, it’s only fair to acknowledge that research consistently shows that marriage itself is one of the strongest predictors of longevity — especially for men. Studies suggest that married individuals tend to live longer, experience better mental health, and have stronger immune function than their unmarried peers. (For example, negative moods like loneliness may change the way the immune system functions and are associated with increased risk of exacerbated inflammation.) A meta-analysis in the American Journal of Epidemiology found that married men had a 9-15 percent lower risk of premature death compared to unmarried men, with emotional support and shared responsibilities playing a key role:
Using large-scale pooled panel survey data linked to death registrations and earnings histories for U.S. men and women aged 25 and older, and with appropriate contrast tests, we find a consistent survival advantage for married over unmarried men and women, and an additional survival “premium” for married men. We find little evidence of mortality differences between never-married, divorced/separated, and widowed statuses.
But does this mean the benefits of marriage are the same as the benefits of more general socializing? Not necessarily. Researchers believe marriage’s longevity benefits come from multiple factors: Spouses provide built-in social interaction, daily companionship, and emotional support; Spouses — whether from love, self-interest, and/or other motives — encourage healthy behaviors, at least one reason that married individuals are more likely to exercise, eat well, and seek medical care.
Spouses in stable marriages have been linked with lower levels of stress hormones, which contribute to better heart health and reduced inflammation. (Just further proof that listening to my wife is good for my health?) In contrast, friendships, online or in-person, offer social stimulation but not necessarily the same level of emotional and lifestyle support. So, while marriage is a form of socializing, its benefits extend beyond it.
Online vs. In-Person, Vive la Difference?
Digital communication can provide meaningful social interaction. Some studies, including in Gerontologist, suggest that social media and video calls can reduce loneliness, especially among seniors who have mobility limitations or live alone. “Social media communication was associated with higher levels of perceived social support and social contact, which were related to lower levels of loneliness among older adults.”
Other research, however, cautions that online interaction doesn’t fully replace face-to-face engagement. One article, “Human Connection in a Digital Age,” reports that while digital communication helped maintain relationships, it didn’t yield the same level of emotional fulfillment as in-person interactions. An article published by McLean Hospital, although related mostly to teens, reported that excessive online engagement — particularly passive scrolling — correlates with higher levels of anxiety and depression. Adding to the problem is that “social media has a reinforcing nature. Using it activates the brain’s reward center by releasing dopamine, a ‘feel-good chemical’ linked to pleasurable activities such as sex, food, and social interaction. The platforms are designed to be addictive and are associated with anxiety, depression, and even physical ailments.” (RELATED: Suing Social Media Won’t Save the Children — But It Could Silence Everyone)
Why? Neuroscientists suggest that in-person interaction activates deeper cognitive and emotional processes. When we talk face-to-face, our brains process nonverbal cues, tone of voice, and subtle expressions — things that even a Zoom call can’t fully replicate. I mean, I guess a guy can look at gorgeous scantily clad women online or in person in the bedroom. Any difference? Even without touching?
So, the science backs my wife? She’s very smart.
Do Facebook Friends Count?
Not so fast. If your online friendships involve meaningful engagement — discussing ideas, sharing personal stories, supporting each other — then they do contribute to well-being. But if most of your time online consists of liking posts, scrolling through news feeds, or arguing with strangers about politics, you might not be getting the social boost you think. (Not included in this discussion are reported general health risks of “screen time”).
Also, different people have different social needs. Some introverts thrive on online interaction and find in-person socializing exhausting. Extroverts, on the other hand, may feel starved for connection without physical presence.
But in the context of longevity studies, one thing remains clear: in-person socialization has unique benefits that online interactions can’t fully replace. If your online interactions are meaningful, frequent, and involve real conversation, they do contribute to emotional well-being. But if your wife is urging you to go out and engage in face-to-face social activities, she’s got decades of research on her side.
So maybe I’ll compromise — drop by the senior center occasionally while keeping my online social circles strong. And, of course, bring this up next time we have pizza and chardonnay.
READ MORE from Walter Donway:
Would the Whiff of AI Have Panicked Harold Ross?
READ MORE:
American Dominance in AI Starts With Open-Weight Models
When Cars Were Cars — And Cup Holders Held Cups
Walter Donway is the author of A Serious Chat with Artificial Intelligence, published in March.
