Yesterday was a good day for transparency and accountability in government, but a bad day for Gina McCarthy, President Obama’s nominee to head up the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This would explain why Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) is considering parliamentary maneuvers on the Environment and Public Works Committee that could force a vote on her confirmation.
Since all eight of the Republican committee members are boycotting the vote, the committee lacks a quorum. McCarthy, who is currently the assistant administrator for the Office of Air and Radiation, has declined to share information with Congress, according to a letter addressed to her from Sen. David Vitter (R-La.)
“EPA has continually refused to make public the basic scientific data underlying virtually all of the agency’s claimed benefits from the Clean Air Act (CAA) rules,” the letter says. “Everyone agrees on the importance of clean air, but EPA needs to release the secret data they use in formulating new rules.”
In a press release, energy and environment experts with the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) praised Vitter, the ranking member, and other Republicans for challenging the nomination.
Their comments are as follows:
“Committee Chairman Barbara Boxer and other Democratic members of the committee asserted over and over she had answered all their questions—more than 1,000! This is simply untrue,” said Myron Ebell, director of CEI’s Center for Energy and Environment.
“To take only the most important instance of obstruction, McCarthy, as Assistant Administrator of the EPA for Air and Radiation for the past four years, repeatedly has refused to share with Congress the data upon which the EPA bases its highly implausible claims of hundreds of billions of dollars in health benefits from recent regulations.”
“This is not about policy, and Sen. David Vitter and the other Republicans on the committee understand this,” said Christopher Horner, senior fellow at CEI, attorney and author of The Liberal War on Transparency, research for which uncovered a climate of deceit and obstruction at EPA. “To hear Democrats claim ‘obstruction’ when Republicans ask simply that EPA come clean before having one of its most secretive officials promoted really takes the cake.”
CEI has had to take EPA to court over seven different Freedom of Information Act requests since last fall to force release of public records of conversations among top agency staffers and outside groups on the administration’s war on coal and its attempts to build support for a carbon tax. Several suits are still pending. In one suit that has been settled, the federal court ordered EPA to turn over nearly 12,000 emails, but EPA has withheld or heavily redacted nearly 7,400 of these.
Horner’s research revealed the Obama administration’s widespread disregard for federal laws that dictate how agencies maintain their records and respond to FOIA requests. In the case of EPA, he discovered that Lisa Jackson, EPA administrator for the past four years, ordered EPA staff to create a fake employee named Richard Windsor and assign “his” email account for her to use to conduct official business with environmental pressure groups, other special interests, and top staffers. Her chief counsel resigned shortly thereafter. Jackson resigned a few weeks later when a federal court ordered that the Richard Windsor e-mails would have to be made public as a result of CEI’s FOIA request.
“The current regime at EPA has claimed it has nothing to hide, while doing everything imaginable to tell us the opposite is true,” Horner said. “If Gina McCarthy wants to be administrator, let her come clean and share the records we have requested. The time to deal with whatever problems the emails and texts may present is now, not after she takes over.”
For additional information on CEI’s efforts to pry loose information from McCarthy, click here.
Notice to Readers: The American Spectator and Spectator World are marks used by independent publishing companies that are not affiliated in any way. If you are looking for The Spectator World please click on the following link: https://thespectator.com/world.