…calls for a ridiculous pun in the dissent. Scalia writes (pdf):
Since the Regulation does not run afowl (so to speak) of the Court’s newly invented prohibition of “parroting”; and since the Directive represents the agency’s own interpretation of that concededly valid regulation; the only question remaining is whether that interpretation is “plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation”; otherwise, it is “controlling.”
Get it? Afowl, parroting? Get it?
There they go again. First, it was One America News...Read More
If you’re like me, you’ve only recently heard of the...Read More
During the last few years, most conservatives have become at...Read More
The Cashless Revolution: China’s Reinvention of Money and the End...Read More