Chris Cillizza has an interesting item about how Evan Bayh’s vote for the Nelson-Hatch amendment — which would have imposed serious restrictions on taxpayer funding of abortion in the health care bill — signals the end of his national aspirations. Bayh, who’d previously voted to ban partial-birth abortions, would now have a really tough time overcoming the objections of pro-choice activists. And he’s moved right on just enough issues to give him trouble in other policy areas too.
Cillizza’s right that we probably won’t see a President Bayh, but I think the rollcall on Nelson-Hatch signals something more basic: the political difficulty of representing a red state and voting for taxpayer funding of abortion. Bayh is up for reelection in 2010 and is trying to avoid handing a possible Republican challenger easy ammunition. It was the strategy employed by the last Democrat who ran against John Hostettler, current Congressman Brad Ellsworth.
Notice to Readers: The American Spectator and Spectator World are marks used by independent publishing companies that are not affiliated in any way. If you are looking for The Spectator World please click on the following link: https://thespectator.com/world.