It remains astonishing that somebody with the ethical baggage of Hillary Clinton should be receiving less attention and less serious attempts to block her nomination than is Eric Holder. If Holder is not worthy of office because of the pardons of Marc Rich and the Puerto Rican terrorists, then why do those things not disqualify Hillary as well? Especially when combined with…. the Hollywood fundraising scandal, the coffee klatsches in the White House, the entire sordid history of Whitewater and the Rose Law Firm, the missing billing records, the corrupt cattle trades, her lies in the White House Travel Office fiasco, her unethical behavior on the Watergate Committee, her repeated going to bat for big donors to her husband’s foundation, her husband’s convoluted business affairs, her husband’s conflicts of interest (which benefit her, too) with so much speech money and foundation money coming from foreign interests…… etc etc etc etc etc.
She is no more fit to be secretary of state than Bernie Madoff is fit to be an ethics counselor.
