Rep. Louise Slaughter, chairwoman of the House Rules Committee, has declared that the Senate bill does not represent real reform and cannot be reconciled with the version that passed the House of Representatives. Instead, she recommended killing the Senate bill and starting all over.
"The Senate health care bill is not worthy of the historic vote that the House took a month ago," Slaughter wrote in an opinion piece appearing on CNN's website today.
She complained that without the presence of a public option, the bill won't lower costs and would represent a subsidy to private insurance.
"Although the art of legislating involves compromise, I believe the Senate went off the rails when it agreed with the Obama Administration to water down the reform bill and no longer include the public option," she wrote.
She also complained that the bill would allow insurers to charge higher premiums to older people and does not repeal the antitrust exemption enjoyed by insurers.
She concludes:
Supporters of the weak Senate bill say "just pass it -- any bill is better than no bill."
I strongly disagree -- a conference report is unlikely to sufficiently bridge the gap between these two very different bills.
It's time that we draw the line on this weak bill and ask the Senate to go back to the drawing board. The American people deserve at least that.
The statement is a headache for Democratic leadership at a time when they are on the verge of passing a bill in the Senate. In the first go around, the House bill passed by a narrow 220 to 215 vote, so Speaker Nancy Pelosi only has three votes to spare. The absence of the Stupak abortion language is already going to cost her some votes among pro-life Democrats (as well as the lone Republican to vote for it, Joseph Cao), so any votes she loses on the left would have to be made up elsewhere. Any compromise to attract liberal members of the House could upset the delicate balance that achieved 60 votes in the Senate. On the other hand Rep. Jason Altmir, a Democrat who voted against the bill the first time, said "a lot" of Blue Dog Democrats could support something along the lines of the Senate bill this time around.
Via the Hill.
ECM| 12.23.09 @ 2:44PM
They've seen the polls and now they want to kill it dead going into the 2010 elections.
Eric Cartman| 12.23.09 @ 3:39PM
I don't think they care about the polls. And with the Republicans not really getting upset about it - I mean really, have you heard ANY Republican point to a Dem and say they are lying socialists who is going to destroy health care and in the process the country for the poor (layabouts, drug attics and people too stupid to prepare for life ) . No, we get "My friend from Nebraska this and My friend from Massachusetts that" Such spinelessness has not been seen since the invention of Jello.
Pingback| 12.23.09 @ 2:44PM
Twitter Trackbacks for The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Top House Dem: Scrap Se links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Paul| 12.23.09 @ 2:54PM
This is more fake Democratic drama. They're going to reconcile and pass the bill. If Ms. Pelosi needs Ms. Slaughter's vote, she'll have it, one way or the other (yawn).
Ellis Wyatt| 12.23.09 @ 3:28PM
I think she realizes this current bill has no chance of being passed. I don't see it getting out of the house and if it does it will be so changed I doubt it could achieve cloture in senate. The public option is a non-starter and I think she knows that too. So, I think alot of dems are seeing that they can pass a horrible bill and get killed in the midterms or try and salvage their careers and live to fight another day.
Tim Williams| 12.23.09 @ 3:32PM
She is making noises to appease the left. She'll still vote for it.
Duh.
Richard Baker| 12.23.09 @ 4:24PM
ECM:
This is to divert from the reality of this abomination. This legislation will guarantee the 2nd American Revolution. Sic Semper Tyrannis.
Dion| 12.23.09 @ 4:52PM
Mark Steyn is right. The leftists don't care that they may lose a little power in 2010 or 2012. They will have installed the infrastructure for their eventual and permanent power. It's not about healthcare, it's about the firmament of Socialism in the US. Next up; dissolution of the southern border.
Jim Hlavac| 12.23.09 @ 5:15PM
Dion writes: "next up; dissolution of the southern border."
I spent months in Mazatlan Mexico, well south of the border. The newspapers there, (and there are three city dailies,) are filled with the sort of anti-government bashing that we could only wish for here in our mush-rags.
The Sonoran and Sinaloan (the two states I was in) newspapers call for a US style constitution for the United States of Mexico (that's on their money, by the way) and for a Bill of Rights translated from ours, and for less taxes, and for less regulations, and for loads less command and control from Mexico City. There are many calls to get rid of the ancient civil code and bring in modern US common law.
Noroeste (Northwest) -- a major newspaper in Sonora has all but called for secession from Mexico and petitioning to join the US as the 52st State. Sonora is even exempt from many Mex. national laws to be more in line with Arizona (even the only Mex state to not change to Day lights savings, just like AZ.)
I dare say, that Mexico is going towards liberty and capitalism just as fast as we are moving in the opposite direction.
Moreover, Mexico is building a fence along their border with Guatemala, they are tired of, ahem, illegal aliens.
Nearly 100% of the Mexicans I ever spoke to -- in Spanish, mind you -- admires the US. They want their country to be like ours [was]. (don't confuse their Al Sharptons and Jesse Jacksons with the sentiments of the real people, there are Mexican, um, burros, also.)
They are tired of the corruption, and joke openly about it. They want to throw the bums out as furiously as we do.
In fact, while the two country's political classes are brain dead socialists at this point, the vast vast majority of people are freedom loving capitalists -- and if you think for a moment that a guy who waits for hours outside a Home Depot in Chicago is waiting for a handout -- well, he's not -- he's ready, willing and able to work. No Mexican gave up their lives, their families, and often their life savings to come north because they want to reinstitute what they just so recently left because it is unsustainable. In a Reaganesque reality, they are voting with their feet.
In a radical idea -- what happens if we join with Mexico in patrolling the 200 mile long border at the far south, so that the 2000 mile border up north is as free as the 4000 mile one with Canada? And what would happen if the forces of a free market were unleashed on the decrepit state of a lot of Mexico? Why, the business opportunities would be substantial. Why, we'd get a combined country, richer than ever, with 420,000,000 people -- And at the rate that Mexicans are learning English ( a school at every corner nearly) there will be precious few in just a generation or two who will be able to speak Spanish anyway.
The socialists here might be rudely surprised to find that your Average Mexican is just as libertarian as your average American. And the socialist's open border policy will be for naught.
fedupinflorida| 12.23.09 @ 9:06PM
Hey, look over here:
"Top House Dem: Scrap Senate Bill and Start Over"
No, wait, what's that over there?
"House Dems: We won't roll over"
http://www.politico.com/news/s.....30916.html
Oooh, look at that shiny!
"Obama plans for health care delay, new jobs bill"
http://www.politico.com/news/s.....30925.html
Can you say subterfuge?
Pingback| 12.23.09 @ 11:32PM
The HSA Coalition » McConnell likes Dan Perrin’s Strategy links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 12.24.09 @ 12:38AM
On the Brink of Disaster – by Jacob Laksin | FrontPage Magazine links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Jack| 12.24.09 @ 9:37AM
It's interesting to note that the stock market isn't reacting significantly. In fact, it's up a tad in the last few days. If the market is right, what's happening isn't important, at least economically.
Pingback| 12.24.09 @ 12:56PM
The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Top House Dem: Scrap Senate … | Headlines Today links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
TLS| 12.24.09 @ 1:14PM
Jack, it is significant. I would say that what is happening with HC is already priced into the market. In fact, if you look just at the HC sector (of stocks) it has lagged significantly behind the overall market the last year. The Dow would easily be at 12,000 without this mess, IMHO.
Pingback| 12.24.09 @ 1:14PM
The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Top House Dem: Scrap Senate … | Drakz News Stat links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Oldefarte| 12.24.09 @ 2:02PM
Slaughter is RIGHT for all of the WRONG reasons. This WELFARECARE should be scraped, not because of insurance companies matters, but because it is nothing more than another liberal Democratic giveaway to their indigent constituents, all at taxpayer expense. In scrapping/dismantling it, serious TORT REFORM, INTERSTATE PURCHASING OF INSURANCE ACROSS STATE LINES, and NULLIFICATION OF MEDICAL PROCEDURE PRICING should be the key items of consideration for substantially lowering of medical prices [and correspondingly healthcare insurance premiums]. If/when these latter concerns are built into congressional legislation, it will them truly become HEALTHCARE REFORM [but not until]!!!!
Pingback| 12.25.09 @ 8:30AM
African American Artists on Disc | The African Art Store links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 12.25.09 @ 11:54AM
House Energy Aid Program | My Efficient Planet links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 12.27.09 @ 1:39PM
On the Brink of Disaster « links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
racking| 1.4.10 @ 11:11PM
http://www.racking-shelving.com
http://www.cold-store-equipment.com
as a whole contractor for cold store equipment, design, manufacturing, installation.
professional racking & shelving manufacturer, pallet racking, drive in racking,
cantilever racking, longspan shelving, dexion racking,