On Twitter, Politico's Ben Smith asks,
"At this
point, how is current proposal substantially different from
Romneycare?"
The answer is, it ain't.
Here's how Mitt Romney
explained the differences between the health care bill he
signed in Massachusetts in 2006, and Obamacare, in a CNN
interview earlier this month:
(T)here's an important difference between what we did and what
President Barack Obama is proposing. Number one, we solved our
problem at the state level. Let states deal with the problem of
uninsured individuals.
And, number two, we have no public option. There's no
government option. And what's primarily wrong with the
president's plan is that he wants to get the federal government
into the health insurance business. It's going to require
massive subsidies, a trillion dollars of costs down the road.
Though we haven't seen the current bill yet, if reports are
accurate, it does not contain a public option or Medicare
expansion. What remains is a Medicaid expansion, a mandate
forcing individuals to purchase insurance or pay a tax, and
sliding scale subsidies for individuals to purchase
government-designed insurance policies on new government-run
exchanges -- and those elements formed the core of Romneycare.
So now, if Obamacare passes, Romney will be left telling angry
primary voters that the only real difference between the two
plans is that he implemented his policies at the state level,
while Obama did it through the federal government. Sure, it's
clearly worse if the federal government is implementing bad
policies, but it's hard to see how such an argument would pass
muster with anybody but those who are already ardent Romney
supporters. It's sort of like saying, "As governor, I raised
state income taxes, but the thought of raising federal income
taxes -- that's an outrage!"
UPDATE: Romney spokesman Eric Fehrnstrom
emails Ben Smith:
There are some similarities. For instance, the concept of the
"exchange" where people can shop for affordable health plans
was pioneered in Massachachusetts. But Mitt's Romney's health
care reforms are different in several important respects.
First, the bill signed by Governor Romney did not raise taxes.
Second, its focus was on strengthening the private insurance
market, and I don't think anyone believes that Democrats have
given up on their dream of a public option. And finally,
Governor Romney believes states should be free to come up with
their own approach instead of having Washington create a
"one-size-fits-all" solution for the entire country.
This answer is problematic on several levels. For one thing,
while the Romney camp would like to argue that the bill he signed
did not raise taxes, in actuality, it did include a mandate that
individuals purchase insurance or pay a penalty. In arguing
against Obamacare, conservatives have described the mandate as a
middle class tax hike. Republican candidates will spend all of
2010 describing it as such, and if anybody else were running
against Obama in 2012, it would be used to argue that he violated
his pledge to not raise the taxes of those making under $250,000.
If Romney wants to spend the Republican presidential primary
siding with Democrats and the Obama administration in arguing
that the individual mandate isn't a tax, I'm sure his opponents
will be thrilled. Furthermore, this doesn't even take into
account the subsequent tax hikes signed by Romney's successor to
help pay for the ongoing costs of the health care bill, such as
last year's cigarette tax increase.
Fehrnstrom argues that the Romney plan was about strengthening
private insurance, and yet, just as the government dictates the
design of private health care policies offered on the exchanges
created by the Senate bill, so too, does Romneycare. In
Massachusetts, the Commonwealth Health Insurance Connector's
Board approves plans offered in the exchange, and determines what
counts as "Minimum
Creditable Coverage" needed to comply with the insurance
mandate.
I responded to the whole attempt to differentiate between federal
and state policy above, but as Smith
notes, "in the end, Romney does seem to have helped set the
model for the national plan."
…Press blog. Topsy Plugin – WordPress 2 Shortened Links Linking to the spectator.org page http://bit.ly/5i9lBT info http://bit.ly/62uH0Z info 3 tweet tweet The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Is Romney a Big Loser in Senate Compromise? spectator.org/blog/2009/12/15/is-romney-a-big-loser-in-senat – view page – cached On Twitter, Politico's Ben Smith asks, "At this point, how is current…
…care bill emerging from the Senate differ from the plan that passed in Massachusetts under Mitt Romney, and the answer from his conservative critics is fairly clear: The bill isn’t any different, writes the American Spectators Phillip Klein. Romney spokesman Eric Fehrnstrom emails over his view: There are some similarities. For instance, the concept of the “exchange” where people can shop…
TomH| 12.15.09 @ 3:21PM
Phil:
Oh Mr. Kelin, you still don't get it. Angry voters were angry
about the public option and medicare expansion.
And, as you say, "Obamacare does not contain a public option or
Medicare expansion"
Did you see that Klein? The anger that voters had just
evaporated.
Health votes are about health care reform. A majority of
Americans see this as Health care reform and want it.
Romney is going to need Democrats to win the next Presidential
election and he'll have a friend in Democrats if they know how he
knows how to speak "health care reform" and isn't an enemy to it.
This one is going to bite you in the behind Klein.
You're wrong on this one.
Rank and File| 12.15.09 @ 3:23PM
It does pose some challenges for Romney, ideologically, but the
"state level" argument isn't insignificant. It's sort of
everything. States should be able to support their own policies
-- well or ill-advised. That's is carved into the bedrock of
Conservatism.
Moreover, the public-option is about as far from the shores of
the current bill as the high tide from the low tide. If the
floodwaters of Reid/Pelosi/Obama health care get inked into law,
the high-tide of the government option will find its way in.
TomH| 12.15.09 @ 3:58PM
Republicans need to do a better job on this issue.
So far, Democracts know more about health costs and are trying to
address it whilst Republicans are crying "socialized medicine."
In the US. total health care spending was 2.4 trillion or about
$7,900 per person!
That figure is 50% MORE than the next most costly nation and
that's Norway.
The ONLY reasonable or rational objection to Obama's health care
plan was the public option.
But, according to Philip Klein, the public option is most likely
out.
Republicans have made their own proposals but they don't address
the COST of skyrocketing health care.
Where are the Republican innovators who dare to tackle this
issue?
If Democrats are doing something about costs, TomH, why in the
world are they doing anything, ANYTHING to get to 60 votes? That
doesn't sound like controlling costs to me.
Oh, and about that cost thing, the Medicare actuary already said
it ain't going to do anything to lower costs and will more than
likely exacerbate cost increases. No one makes that argument
anymore these days.
…Americans should be grateful for Obama’s Nobel speech. Cohn keeps score of the Lieberman debate. Lamont uses Lieberman’s health care headlines to raise money. A TPM reader sees the upside. Klein is reminded of Romneycare. Bankers say Obama was nicer in person. Scheiber looks at the improving employment forecast. A disappointing turnout for the Tea Party crowd. DCCC goes on the offensive over…
…page http://bit.ly/5i9lBT info http://bit.ly/62uH0Z info 3 tweet tweet The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Is Romney a Big Loser in Senate Compromise? … Read more: The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Is Romney a Big Loser in … Posted in American | Tags: info-http, linking, loser, page-http, plugin, romney, senate, senate-compromise, shortened, shortened-links, spectator, the-spectator-org,…
Ken (Old Texican)| 12.15.09 @ 6:39PM
Nothing new here.
Fed programs are DESTINED to balloon over budget.
That is how they kill people.
Harrison| 12.15.09 @ 8:21PM
Romney took on the job of Governor of MA to help that state climb
out of the bankrupt pit it was sliding into. A significant factor
of the MA plummet uninsured residents getting medical care and
not paying for it. The taxpayers were stuck paying the bills and
were fed up with it.
Romney put together a plan that freed taxpayers from paying
someone else's medical bills and placed the responsibility for
medical care back on individuals' shoulders. His plan involved NO
money from taxpayers; it was privately funded. His compassionate
approach to the sick also enabled the uninsured to purchase
affordable health care coverage. The Dem controlled legislature
added to/changed the bill somewhat to include monies of 1% of
MA's annual budget. Currently, the health care plan in MA is
operating on budget. The residents of MA have health care
coverage.
Remember, Romney took on this problem when health care wasn't in
the public eye as it is now. He worked to solve a complicated,
difficult problem, pretty much on his own.
Ashton| 12.15.09 @ 8:46PM
If Obamacare passes in 2010 and becomes law, it would take
healthcare as an issue off the table for 2012.
Even if the plan the President signs ultimately ends up like the
one Romney adopted in Massachusetts, I would think that would
benefit Romney because a divisive issue that would otherwise
linger into the next Republican primary would effectively be
settled.
I would think it hurts Romney more if no deal is reached and
nationalized healthcare remains a hotly debated issue for another
election cycle.
Frank| 12.15.09 @ 9:19PM
Romney's bill doesn't cut Medicare by 500 billion dollars.
It also doesn't cost a trillion dollars.
The people of Massachusetts like the Romney health care reforms,
even if some outside groups do not. States should be free to come
up with their own healthcare solutions.
While it's true the Democrats in Massachusetts raised taxes after
Romney left, that can hardly be blamed on Romney. That's what
Democrats do - raise taxes. They're raised the cigarette tax, the
sales tax, the meals tax, the hotel tax, the tax on alcohol,
business taxes, and taxes on utilities. If anything, what this
tax-raising demonstrates is how important it was to have an
anti-tax Republican like Romney in the Governor's office.
…/bit.ly/5i9lBT info http://bit.ly/62uH0Z info 3 tweet tweet The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Is Romney a Big Loser in Senate Compromise? … See the original post: The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Is Romney a Big Loser in … Posted in American | Tags: info-http, linking, loser, page-http, plugin, romney, senate, senate-compromise, shortened, shortened-links, spectator, the-spectator-org,…
…/bit.ly/5i9lBT info http://bit.ly/62uH0Z info 3 tweet tweet The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Is Romney a Big Loser in Senate Compromise? … Continue reading here: The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Is Romney a Big Loser in … Posted in American | Tags: info-http, loser, page-http, plugin, romney, senate, senate-compromise, shortened, shortened-links, spectator, the-spectator-org, topsy-plugin…
Wanted to thank all whom have spoken so intelligently in support
of Gov. Romney's Healthcare plan and economic record in Mass. I
often worry that the "facts" are ever increasingly the second
greatest casualty this nation faces. Keep up the good work for in
a commitment to what is factual you all give me hope.
…GOP frontrunner for 2012 (however dubious a title that may be in 2009). But since we have been debating health care “reform”, it’s inevitable to look at what Massachusetts did a few years ago under then-Gov. Romney. So now, if Obamacare passes, Romney will be left telling angry primary voters that the only real difference between the two plans is that he implemented his policies at the…
BOSMAN| 12.16.09 @ 10:18AM
I own a mid-sized business in MA. When Romney was Gov, My taxes
went down and my employees premiums went down as well. Romney
didn't stay long enough to tweak out any unforeseen problems. He
vetoed the goodies that the MA legislature added LATER under
Governor Patrick. The supposed problems with Romney's health care
program in MA are attributable to the changes made by the new
governor - who has bloated it, over-regulated it and applied it
to illegals. The cost of Romney care is less than 1.3% of the
States budget. Patrick has chosen not to make Healthcare a
Priority. If he would, the 1.3%, would be even less. Ma fiscal
problems are a result of Patrick. He spends money like a kid in a
candy store. In addition, Romney has stated that Individual
states should determine health care issues in their states. This
should not be mandated by Washington. a study was done recently
shows that MA RESIDENTS still like the system. It seems MA HEALTH
CARES biggest critics, DON'T LIVE IN MA!
…sells out the unborn in exchange for several hundred million dollars for Nebraska. Blue Dogs are mostly lap dogs. Blanche Lincoln makes up new constitutional power to justify Obamacare. Reminder: Obamacare is Romneycare. Georgia allows guns on buses, crime goes down. (Hat Tip: Don Surber.) Government recalls 800,000 weak swine flu vaccines. (Hat TIp: Michelle Malkin.) Boy scout returns $2,000 found in a purse.…
…Related Blogs on Info Http The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Senate Passes Health Care Bill http://andmoreagainonline.blogspot.com/2009/12/levis-perfect-body … The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Is Romney a Big Loser in … Related Posts American Academy of Dermatology Association Commends U.S. Senate … The Niles Star » Health care bill could burn tanning salons The Niles Star » Health…
…the Republican presidential nomination in 2008 and is considered a front-runner for the nomination in 2012. The health-care plan that Romney signed in 2006 is already facing huge cost overruns, causing many to question whether the issue might become a liability to the former governor when he and other Republicans are attacking the Obama administration for its health-care plan and what they say will be its…
…time as the public option dropped off the table. (Back in August, CNN said RomneyCare was becoming a “model” for the federal plan.) In fact, Philip Klein wrote a column about the two programs’ similarities just last month at AmSpec, noting particularly that both programs of course contain an individual mandate, which conservatives regard as a de facto middle-class tax hike. And as Brown…
…effort may have been less ambitious than Obama’s reforms — unlike the national bills, the Massachusetts law did not try to contain health care costs — but it’s not very different from “Obamacare.” Both bills require Americans to purchase coverage and provide affordability credits to Americans who can’t afford insurance, create insurance exchanges, establish minimum…
…in Massachusetts is almost all about national health care reform. What has gone underreported is the fact that Massachusetts has already implemented its own state version of health care reform that closely resembles the U.S. Senate plan. So far, public isn’t happy with it, even though 97 percent of Bay State residents now have health insurance. Here is more from Politics Daily: Only 26 percent [of…
…down the Democrats is not so smart, and prying away one Republican is not an impossible task. It may be watered down some more, but mark my words that this bill will not die. The problem goes back to Massachusetts. Mitt Romney passed a landmark health care reform bill in his state that mandated coverage. Scott Brown can tell you all about it; he voted for that bill in the state senate. To that end, it was…
…latest version of the health care bill in the U.S. Senate closely resembles— brace yourself —the plan that Republican Mitt Romney signed into law as Massachusetts governor in 2006, according to The American Spectator . Both reforms did not include a government-run insurance program or an expansion of Medicare. Both did expand Medicaid and have an individual mandate to purchase insurance—with penalties attached.…
…means that the federal plan bears a closer family resemblance than ever to Romney’s idea,” former Bush speech writer David Frum observed. American Spectator’s Philip Klein said there “ ain’t” any substantial differences between the plans. The key parts of the Democratic proposal are the same as “those elements [that] formed the core of Romneycare,” Klein adds. Leave a…
…from the O-Care clusterfark — I’d say Ryan given how he turned it into a platform for his ideas on entitlement reform — but there’s really no question who the loser is, as both critics and supporters alike have discerned a striking resemblance between RomneyCare and the bouncing baby behemoth born in the House last night. Ambinder claims it’s an open question whether RomneyCare…
Pingback| 12.15.09 @ 12:04PM
Twitter Trackbacks for The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Is Romney a Big Loser i links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 12.15.09 @ 3:10PM
nuze.me links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
TomH| 12.15.09 @ 3:21PM
Phil:
Oh Mr. Kelin, you still don't get it. Angry voters were angry about the public option and medicare expansion.
And, as you say, "Obamacare does not contain a public option or Medicare expansion"
Did you see that Klein? The anger that voters had just evaporated.
Health votes are about health care reform. A majority of Americans see this as Health care reform and want it.
Romney is going to need Democrats to win the next Presidential election and he'll have a friend in Democrats if they know how he knows how to speak "health care reform" and isn't an enemy to it.
This one is going to bite you in the behind Klein.
You're wrong on this one.
Rank and File| 12.15.09 @ 3:23PM
It does pose some challenges for Romney, ideologically, but the "state level" argument isn't insignificant. It's sort of everything. States should be able to support their own policies -- well or ill-advised. That's is carved into the bedrock of Conservatism.
Moreover, the public-option is about as far from the shores of the current bill as the high tide from the low tide. If the floodwaters of Reid/Pelosi/Obama health care get inked into law, the high-tide of the government option will find its way in.
TomH| 12.15.09 @ 3:58PM
Republicans need to do a better job on this issue.
So far, Democracts know more about health costs and are trying to address it whilst Republicans are crying "socialized medicine."
In the US. total health care spending was 2.4 trillion or about $7,900 per person!
That figure is 50% MORE than the next most costly nation and that's Norway.
The ONLY reasonable or rational objection to Obama's health care plan was the public option.
But, according to Philip Klein, the public option is most likely out.
Republicans have made their own proposals but they don't address the COST of skyrocketing health care.
Where are the Republican innovators who dare to tackle this issue?
Chris Bolts Sr.| 12.15.09 @ 4:55PM
If Democrats are doing something about costs, TomH, why in the world are they doing anything, ANYTHING to get to 60 votes? That doesn't sound like controlling costs to me.
Oh, and about that cost thing, the Medicare actuary already said it ain't going to do anything to lower costs and will more than likely exacerbate cost increases. No one makes that argument anymore these days.
Pingback| 12.15.09 @ 5:41PM
nuze.me links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 12.15.09 @ 6:09PM
The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Is Romney a Big Loser in … links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Ken (Old Texican)| 12.15.09 @ 6:39PM
Nothing new here.
Fed programs are DESTINED to balloon over budget.
That is how they kill people.
Harrison| 12.15.09 @ 8:21PM
Romney took on the job of Governor of MA to help that state climb out of the bankrupt pit it was sliding into. A significant factor of the MA plummet uninsured residents getting medical care and not paying for it. The taxpayers were stuck paying the bills and were fed up with it.
Romney put together a plan that freed taxpayers from paying someone else's medical bills and placed the responsibility for medical care back on individuals' shoulders. His plan involved NO money from taxpayers; it was privately funded. His compassionate approach to the sick also enabled the uninsured to purchase affordable health care coverage. The Dem controlled legislature added to/changed the bill somewhat to include monies of 1% of MA's annual budget. Currently, the health care plan in MA is operating on budget. The residents of MA have health care coverage.
Remember, Romney took on this problem when health care wasn't in the public eye as it is now. He worked to solve a complicated, difficult problem, pretty much on his own.
Ashton| 12.15.09 @ 8:46PM
If Obamacare passes in 2010 and becomes law, it would take healthcare as an issue off the table for 2012.
Even if the plan the President signs ultimately ends up like the one Romney adopted in Massachusetts, I would think that would benefit Romney because a divisive issue that would otherwise linger into the next Republican primary would effectively be settled.
I would think it hurts Romney more if no deal is reached and nationalized healthcare remains a hotly debated issue for another election cycle.
Frank| 12.15.09 @ 9:19PM
Romney's bill doesn't cut Medicare by 500 billion dollars.
It also doesn't cost a trillion dollars.
The people of Massachusetts like the Romney health care reforms, even if some outside groups do not. States should be free to come up with their own healthcare solutions.
While it's true the Democrats in Massachusetts raised taxes after Romney left, that can hardly be blamed on Romney. That's what Democrats do - raise taxes. They're raised the cigarette tax, the sales tax, the meals tax, the hotel tax, the tax on alcohol, business taxes, and taxes on utilities. If anything, what this tax-raising demonstrates is how important it was to have an anti-tax Republican like Romney in the Governor's office.
Pingback| 12.15.09 @ 11:06PM
The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Is Romney a Big Loser in … links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 12.15.09 @ 11:06PM
The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Is Romney a Big Loser in … links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Stephen Thomas| 12.16.09 @ 12:36AM
Wanted to thank all whom have spoken so intelligently in support of Gov. Romney's Healthcare plan and economic record in Mass. I often worry that the "facts" are ever increasingly the second greatest casualty this nation faces. Keep up the good work for in a commitment to what is factual you all give me hope.
Pingback| 12.16.09 @ 8:02AM
Will RomneyCare scuttle Romney 2012? | A Soft Answer links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
BOSMAN| 12.16.09 @ 10:18AM
I own a mid-sized business in MA. When Romney was Gov, My taxes went down and my employees premiums went down as well. Romney didn't stay long enough to tweak out any unforeseen problems. He vetoed the goodies that the MA legislature added LATER under Governor Patrick. The supposed problems with Romney's health care program in MA are attributable to the changes made by the new governor - who has bloated it, over-regulated it and applied it to illegals. The cost of Romney care is less than 1.3% of the States budget. Patrick has chosen not to make Healthcare a Priority. If he would, the 1.3%, would be even less. Ma fiscal problems are a result of Patrick. He spends money like a kid in a candy store. In addition, Romney has stated that Individual states should determine health care issues in their states. This should not be mandated by Washington. a study was done recently shows that MA RESIDENTS still like the system. It seems MA HEALTH CARES biggest critics, DON'T LIVE IN MA!
ROMNEY / DeMINT in 2012!
Pingback| 12.20.09 @ 11:02AM
Ben Nelson’s Big Sell-Out links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Trackback| 12.24.09 @ 2:47AM
massachusetts credit repair, on massachusetts credit repair, links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 12.26.09 @ 9:16PM
The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Health Care Bill to Tax … | Tanning Beauty Wisd links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Trackback| 12.29.09 @ 2:01PM
massachusetts credit repair, on massachusetts credit repair, links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
racking| 1.6.10 @ 10:29AM
http://www.racking-shelving.com
http://www.cold-store-equipment.com
as a whole contractor for cold store equipment, design, manufacturing, installation.
professional racking & shelving manufacturer, pallet racking, drive in racking,
cantilever racking, longspan shelving, dexion racking,
Pingback| 1.13.10 @ 7:05PM
Republican Scott Brown defends his vote for Mitt Romney’s Massachusetts health-care p links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 1.13.10 @ 7:21PM
Hot Air » Blog Archive » Scott Brown: Sure, I supported RomneyCare, but… links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 1.19.10 @ 10:41AM
Wonk Room » Romney’s Selfish Defense Of Massachusetts’ Reform: ‘They Don’t Want Obam links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 1.19.10 @ 2:29PM
Health Care Reform Has Already Failed in Mass. « OSPRI BLOG links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 1.20.10 @ 4:23PM
Massachusetts and Health Care: The Fight Must Go On... | Song of Sibyl links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 1.21.10 @ 1:17AM
Republicans and Democrats the Same on Health Care? « StephenBeale.com links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 3.15.10 @ 11:20AM
workhunt.net » Blog Archive » Graham: ‘No Way In The World’ Is Massachusetts’ Health links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 3.22.10 @ 4:59PM
Hot Air » Blog Archive » ObamaCare blasted by … Mitt Romney links to this page. Here’s an excerpt: