The Congressional Budget Office is out with its analysis of the House Democrats'
health care bill. The headline number -- likely to be widely
cited in media accounts -- is that the bill costs $894 billion
over 10 years. But in reality, the CBO says that the gross cost
of the bill will be $1.055 trillion. The $894 billion number
reflects the taxes being paid by individuals who don't have
insurance and employers who don't provide insurance.
In addition, the bill relies on some of the same budgetary
gimmicks as the Senate Finance Committee's bill. Once again, we
see that the Democrats backload the spending provisions into the
final six years of the CBO's 10 year budget window to make it
appear cheaper. Specifically, the CBO says the bill's gross
spending will be $60 billion in the first four years, and $995
billion in the next six years (or 94 percent of the total).
Also, while the CBO says that the bill will reduce deficits by
$104 billion over 10 years and keep reducing the deficit (albiet
slightly) beyond that, it cautions that these estimates assume
that proposed budget cuts will actually get enacted by future
members of Congress. "These longer-term projections assume that
the provisions of H.R. 3962 are enacted and remain unchanged
throughout the next two decades, which is often not the
case for major legislation," the CBO director Douglas Elmendorf
wrote. "The long-term budgetary impact of H.R. 3962 could be
quite different if those provisions generating savings were
ultimately changed or not fully implemented."
The CBO estimate doesn't include the more than $200 billion it
will cost to prevent scheduled cuts to doctors' payments under
Medicare, which Democrats intend to pass through separate
legislation.
The bill would also add 15 million people to the Medicaid rolls,
costing states an additional $34 billion over 10 years.
Another thing to keep in mind is that the CBO report doesn't say
anything about whether the bill actually bends the health care
cost curve. To be clear, while it estimates -- with caveats --
that the bill will reduce deficits, that isn't the same thing as
reducing national health care expenditures, which is how people
derive all those statistics about how high of a percentage of GDP
we spend on health care compared with other countries. If you
hike taxes high enough, you can get the CBO to say it reduces
deficits on paper, but that's a lot different from bringing down
the actual costs of health care to our nation.
This CBO report and moronic democrat party also assume that no
changes to behavior will come about from this legislation.
Doctors will now be slaves to the state by having their labor
controlled by the state. How many doctors will we lose? If
doctors decide to stay how much tax revenues do they fail to pay
with lower salaries? And what incentives will people have to even
buy insurance and take care of themselves when they know we will
be covered regardless? Medical device makers? When they pass on
the costs of their devices who will be paying the bill? The
consumer, you and I, and with the government running the programs
we pass that on to the government. This has to be the third worst
piece of garbage ever to come out of congress following social
security and the federal income tax tax.
…http://bit.ly/2oih02 info Tags #tcot #amspec Add Topsy to Your Blog Turn tweets into comments for your WordPress blog. Topsy Plugin for WordPress 2 tweets Tweet The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : CBO: House Bill Costs $1.055 Trillion spectator.org/blog/2009/10/29/cbo-house-bill-costs-1055-tril – view page – cached The Congressional Budget Office is out with its analysis of the House…
…where Pelosi said that the House bill would cost less than $900 billion? Would it surprise anyone to know that she’s lying her ass off through her Botox induced permasmile teeth? CBO: House Bill Costs $1.055 Trillion The Congressional Budget Office is out with its analysis of the House Democrats’ health care bill. The headline number — likely to be widely cited in media accounts — is…
Carolyn| 10.30.09 @ 9:18AM
Government tyranny and inefficiency at its best. Pelosi should be
so proud
…the gross cost of the bill will be $1.055 trillion. The $894 billion number reflects the taxes being paid by individuals who don't have insurance and employers who don't provide insurance.... The American Spectator CBO's initial analysis: http://cbo.gov/ftpdocs/106xx/doc10688/hr3962Rangel.pdf __________________ America's Most Dangerous Politician click to Listen to: Freedom Fighter Radio A Declaration…
…to the office saying ( once again ) that the only way this bill might prove deficit neutral is if it's followed to the letter—and that's unlikely to happen. The American Spectator 's Phil Klein has more analysis here. Help Reason celebrate its next 40 years. Donate Now! StumbleUpon | Digg | Reddit | Twitter | Facebook Try Reason's award-winning print edition today! Your first issue is FREE if you are not…
…the gross cost of the bill will be $1.055 trillion. The $894 billion number reflects the taxes being paid by individuals who don't have insurance and employers who don't provide insurance.... The American Spectator CBO's initial analysis: http://cbo.gov/ftpdocs/106xx/doc10688/hr3962Rangel.pdf __________________ America's Most Dangerous Politician click to Listen to: Freedom Fighter Radio A Declaration…
…to believe the cost to be. This will hardly give a majority of Americans the “choice” on whether or not to pay for something they don’t want in the first place [Article - CBO: House Bill Costs $1.055 Trillion ]. Possibly related posts: (automatically generated) Ignored: H.R. 3218 – Improving Health Care For All Americans Act Analysis of H.R. 3200 – America’s Affordable Health Choices Act…
…Blogs on Actual Cost The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : More on Why the Actual Cost … Renters Insurance Explained: Actual Cash Value vs. Replacement … The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : CBO: House Bill Costs $1.055 … Related Posts EV WORLDwire: Methanol Fuel Cell Start-Up Eyes Electric Car Range … Chinese electric car company BYD plans American vehicle … Electricity…
…but do not have time to watch or keep up with every new detail. http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/11/the_true_cost_of_obamacare.html Excerpts from the article(emphasis mine): The Congressional Budget Office has estimated the 10-year (2010-2019) cost of the House Democrats’ bill at $1.055 trillion. As usual, there is so much budget gimmickry in these estimates as to make them virtually…
Stan Redmond| 10.29.09 @ 6:25PM
This CBO report and moronic democrat party also assume that no changes to behavior will come about from this legislation. Doctors will now be slaves to the state by having their labor controlled by the state. How many doctors will we lose? If doctors decide to stay how much tax revenues do they fail to pay with lower salaries? And what incentives will people have to even buy insurance and take care of themselves when they know we will be covered regardless? Medical device makers? When they pass on the costs of their devices who will be paying the bill? The consumer, you and I, and with the government running the programs we pass that on to the government. This has to be the third worst piece of garbage ever to come out of congress following social security and the federal income tax tax.
Pingback| 10.29.09 @ 6:30PM
Twitter Trackbacks for The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : CBO: House Bill Costs $ links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 10.29.09 @ 10:28PM
In The House Corner . . . Weighing In At 1990 Pages . . . The Affordable Health Care links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Carolyn| 10.30.09 @ 9:18AM
Government tyranny and inefficiency at its best. Pelosi should be so proud
Pingback| 10.30.09 @ 10:18AM
1,990 Pages of Big Government Health Care Takeover - Page 5 - Political Forum links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 10.30.09 @ 10:46AM
CBO Health-Care Score Assumes Congress Sticks to Its Promises, Which Probably Won't H links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 10.30.09 @ 10:54AM
1,990 Pages of Big Government Health Care Takeover - Page 5 - Political Forum links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 10.30.09 @ 5:16PM
H.R. 3962 – Affordable Health Care for America Act « A Conservative Wanderer links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 10.31.09 @ 2:10AM
The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : More on Why the Actual Cost … | Alternative Fue links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 11.20.09 @ 1:02PM
True cost of Obamacare - skicougar’s blog - RedState links to this page. Here’s an excerpt: