On a day when ABC News has turned over its programing to the
White House so that President Obama can promote his health care
agenda, Americans for Tax Reform gathered together a group on
Capitol Hill to offer a competing, market-based vision for health
care reform.
Sen. Jim DeMint was there to tout his health care proposal
along with Rep. Tom Price.
Price, a former physician in Atlanta, said that, “If the fourth
estate continues to be in the tank (for the Obama administration,
it would endanger the future of the nation.” Price outlined three
“death knells” for the health care system: a government plan that
would crowd out private insurance, coverage mandates, and “ceding
quality to the federal government. He said patients need to make
their own health care decisions and be able to choose plans that
they own and control.
“We don’t need an expansion of government,” DeMint said, and he
outlined his plan for health care that would maintain the
employer-based insurance system, give vouchers to individuals
that would replicate the tax advantages enjoyed by those who
obtain coverage through their employers, and allow people to
purchase insurance across state lines.
DeMint said his plan would be deficit-neutral because it would be
financed by terminating the $700 billion TARP program. If the
program isn’t terminated, he said, it would just be used as a
“slush fund” for the Treasury Department. However, when I asked
DeMint how the plan would be paid for once the TARP money runs
out, he replied, “We just have to see where we’re going.” He
insisted that his reforms would bring down health care costs, and
in any event would be less than the trillions that Obama’s
proposals would cost.
“We can win this if we engage the American people,” DeMint said
of the health care battle. “They are not stupid.”
The event also featured a panel of activists, policy experts, and
a Canadian woman who shared her horror story with their
government-run health care system.
Merrill Matthews, the director of the Council for Affordable
Health Insurance, took aim at the government option. He argued
that Medicare and Medicaid are rampant with fraud and abuse and
use their market share to impose price controls on doctors and
hospitals, which providers then recoup by jacking up prices on
individuals and private insurers. He noted that though proponents
of government health care like to point to the low administrative
costs of Medicare, their estimates leave out costs such as staff
salaries, building rent ,and insurance — alll of which show up
elsewhere in the federal budget. Nor do the estimates of
administrative costs include fraud and abuse. The creation of any
new government plan, Matthews said, would ding taxpayers for the
start up costs, and would continue to change the rules on the
private sector so that it could not compete.
Today, Preident Obama officially said he changed his mind and now
supports the inclusion of an individual mandate requiring people
to purchase health insurance. But Greg Scandlen, director of
Consumers for Health Care Choices, explained that mandates have
proven ineffective. For instance, even though we have mandates
for car insurance, roughly 15 percent of car owners remain
non-compliant.
The room also heard from Shona Holmes, a Canadian who was
suffering from vision loss and had to come to America to get
treated because she was put on a several month waiting list to
see a specialist in her home country, even though she risked
losing her vision if she was not treated in four to six weeks.
Pingback| 6.24.09 @ 7:13PM
Conservatives Counter ABC Obamacare Infomercial - Spectator.org — Cheap Commercial Ve links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 6.25.09 @ 9:09AM
Morning Bell: The White House Infomercial » The Foundry links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Charles| 6.25.09 @ 9:50AM
Can ANYONE identify for us an instance in which the involvement of the Federal Government has resulted in an increase in efficiency? Good LORD!
As an employee of a Government Contractor, my sensibilities are constantly offended by the spectacle of Government waste that confronts me almost daily. The profit motive is the only thing that stands between us and Medical Armagedon.
Wayne Harper| 6.25.09 @ 10:47AM
THINK THE US POSTOFFICE. is exactly what any govt health insurance probram will be in 5 years.
Jerry Hutchins| 6.25.09 @ 11:38AM
I watched that ABC spectacle last night. It was downright sickening to see how BO can sit there and lie so sincerely about the true effects of his forthcoming socialistic health plan. I wanted to vomit just looking at him. If there is one person that I detest the most, it is him.
Marc Laverdiere| 6.25.09 @ 12:48PM
BO (Barrack Obama) is just what this president is , he stinks. This guy is mad in more ways than one and if we do not stop this rediculous spending there will not be anything left to worry about.
John Croix| 6.25.09 @ 2:57PM
I am a medicare recipient - I don't like any kind of government healthcare because it screws the patients, the doctor, and the drug companies. Not to mention I am paying for the ineffiency with my taxes.
Yesterday I went to my Cardiologist. I talked with the nurse, I talked with the cardiologist, we adjusted my medication based on my bloodwork. That was the total interaction.
Then I saw what was being submitted to medicare for payment.
According to what was billed, I had a complete physical examination including palpatation of the neck and abdomen, listening to my breathing, examined my throat and mouth.
They are padding the bill to try and recover their costs. He is a good doctor and I don't want to report him but I am torn because I'm paying the bill both directly and indirectly.
Carol Godec| 6.25.09 @ 3:53PM
As a Senior who is a breast cancer survivor, I have received excellent care. I take seriously my responsibility for exercising, eating healthy, and living healthy, in order to avoid a recurrence. I know I have much to fear if the Obama Administration is successful in their take over of the health care system. I am very aware of the higher cancer rates and higher death rates in European contries with Nationalized health care plans. No one, who is informed, would give up what they have in exchange for this. There are far better and less expensive ways to help those who do not have insurance. There are also better ways to cut costs of Medicare and Medicaid.
Patricia I. Spear| 6.25.09 @ 5:04PM
Listen up "Baby Bo0mers" and I include myself in this group. There are a whole lot of us beginning to retire.
We will be overloading the system, and need more healthcare as we are aging. Obama wants to limit our choices. That means that we become like the automobile, and are rapidly being de-valued every year we age. We are expendable. We are a drain on the healthcare system, and limited access to care that could improve our quality of life and life extension. Think about that for a minute.
Now let your Senator, Congressman and Respresentatives know. Turn up the heat!
No thanks to AARP, of which I am NOT A MEMBER! They are the worst, and do not speak for all of us. Oh, that right, Obama said that he would get rid of Lobbyists. Hmm, I guess he "changed" his mind. What a guy.
DMac| 6.26.09 @ 6:49AM
The citizens of France, the UK and Canada are not looking to "improve" their health care systems by making them look more like ours.
As long as insurance companies profit from delaying and denying care, our health care system will continue to be ranked about 37th (Cuba is 39th) in the world.
By the way, France is ranked number 1 and they pay much less than we do for health care.
marion rundell| 6.26.09 @ 9:45AM
The ultimate success of a BO plan, is that more people will die younger. If the system is government run, rationing WILL occur. A treatable breast cancer for example, spreads in the months the patient waits to see the surgeon. I know lots of surgeons who will simply work 9-5 if they are told they will get payment by Medicare! Most internists now will not accept new Medicare patients. The general practitioner makes less money than a plumber or electrician. Surgeons are burned out by 50. All because they try to balance their paying patients with the ridiculously low payment of Medicare/Medicaid. More Medicare, less medicine. BO plan is a prescription for death.
Pingback| 6.26.09 @ 11:44AM
The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Conservatives Counter ABC … | France Today links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
Pingback| 6.28.09 @ 12:40PM
The American Spectator : AmSpecBlog : Conservatives Counter ABC … | France Today links to this page. Here’s an excerpt: