Bill McGurn has a good
piece in the Wall Street Journal today about the
double standard in which the media allows the Obama
administration to get away with its "saved or created"
formulation to describe the success of the stimulus package. But
I think yesterday's announcement by the White House was an
indication that it's starting to sense the American people are
getting antsy and want to see actual results from the stimulus.
Keep in mind that on a conference call nearly two weeks ago,
Jared Bernstein, who is Joe Biden's chief economic advisor,
said
that the stimulus package would create or save another 600,000
jobs in its second 100 days. Yet yesterday, the White House
orchestrated a whole P.R. campaign to announce plans to
"accelerate implementation" of the stimulus, complete with a
cabinet meeting, a new website, and
Roadmap to
Recovery report, all focused on saving or creating 600,000
jobs -- the same number as they were already projecting before
all of these plans were announced.
What happened in the intervening time period is that news came
out showing the unemployment rate surging to 9.4 percent, with
more than 1.6 million jobs having been lost since the passage of
the stimulus, so clearly the White House felt it needed to do
something. And this leads me to my other point.
Public perception of the stimulus will play a crucial role in the
upcoming health care battle. Many Americans following the debate
won't be wading into the policy details. Instead, they'll be
exposed to claims and counterclaims -- Obama and Democrats saying
their health care legislation will make things better, and
Republicans (if they get their message together) most likely
arguing that it would have disastrous implications. With
both sides throwing statistics back and forth a lot of it will
come down to a credibility issue, and whoever the American people
trust more will win the debate. Will Americans trust Obama that
he can insure everybody, control costs, allow everybody to keep
the insurance they have, improve the quality of health care,
avert a government takeover of medicine, avoid rationing, and
avoid raising taxes on 95 percent of the population? Or will
Republicans be able to convince Americans that he's misleading
them, that insuring everybody will require higher taxes, that
expanding health care will raise costs unless the government
imposes rationing, and that Obama's plans will inevitably lead to
a government takeover? So, if people start to get skeptical about
the results of the stimulus package, then it will make it harder
for Obama and Democrats to sell the public on their health care
claims, and it will be easier for Republicans to attack any
legislation.
Obama's/Democrats' policies WILL fail, but if taxpayers-voters
wait until the cost of same hits them and their wallets, it'll be
too late. An average fifth-grade child should be able to realize
that there is no free lunch [that somebody always pays] and that
the taxes needed to fund Obama's/Democrats' social welfare
schemes are right around the corner. It's not a question of IF
but WHEN! Taxpayer-voters had better wake up fast and prepare
themselves to get to the voting booths ASAP and vote out any
candidates that mention the words BARACK OBAMA!!!!
Daisy| 6.9.09 @ 1:04PM
Smoke and mirrors, just like the Wizard of Oz. Too many da*n
Dorothies in this country.
Ellis Wyatt| 6.9.09 @ 4:55PM
By using this math you could say the tax cuts of George W. Bush
created or saved 130 million jobs after the recession he
inherited and the terrorist attack on our country. I am surprised
someone as arrogant as Obama only claims to have created or saved
150,000 jobs. Honestly I am shocked that they can spout this
garbage with a straight face, although with a compliant media I
guess they may actually believe it.
Gene| 6.9.09 @ 9:57PM
Republican landslide in 10 anyboby
Michael L. Wagner| 6.9.09 @ 11:05PM
Here Read:
+ Canadian Health Insurance: Lessons for the United States /
Government Accountability Office (GAO):
--“If the universal coverage and single-payer features of the
Canadian system were applied in the United States, the savings in
administrative cost alone would be more than enough to finance
insurance coverage for the millions of Americans who are
currently uninsured.”
+ The Truth About Drug Companies / Mother Jones:
“… Angell attacks major pharmaceutical industry -- whose top ten
companies make more in profits than the rest of the Fortune 500
COMBINED -- for using “free market” rhetoric while opposing
competition at all costs.”
Why not Universal Health Care with a $25 deductible after the
first annual visit?
Oldefarte| 6.9.09 @ 12:52PM
Obama's/Democrats' policies WILL fail, but if taxpayers-voters wait until the cost of same hits them and their wallets, it'll be too late. An average fifth-grade child should be able to realize that there is no free lunch [that somebody always pays] and that the taxes needed to fund Obama's/Democrats' social welfare schemes are right around the corner. It's not a question of IF but WHEN! Taxpayer-voters had better wake up fast and prepare themselves to get to the voting booths ASAP and vote out any candidates that mention the words BARACK OBAMA!!!!
Daisy| 6.9.09 @ 1:04PM
Smoke and mirrors, just like the Wizard of Oz. Too many da*n Dorothies in this country.
Ellis Wyatt| 6.9.09 @ 4:55PM
By using this math you could say the tax cuts of George W. Bush created or saved 130 million jobs after the recession he inherited and the terrorist attack on our country. I am surprised someone as arrogant as Obama only claims to have created or saved 150,000 jobs. Honestly I am shocked that they can spout this garbage with a straight face, although with a compliant media I guess they may actually believe it.
Gene| 6.9.09 @ 9:57PM
Republican landslide in 10 anyboby
Michael L. Wagner| 6.9.09 @ 11:05PM
Here Read:
+ Canadian Health Insurance: Lessons for the United States / Government Accountability Office (GAO):
--“If the universal coverage and single-payer features of the Canadian system were applied in the United States, the savings in administrative cost alone would be more than enough to finance insurance coverage for the millions of Americans who are currently uninsured.”
+ The Truth About Drug Companies / Mother Jones:
“… Angell attacks major pharmaceutical industry -- whose top ten companies make more in profits than the rest of the Fortune 500 COMBINED -- for using “free market” rhetoric while opposing competition at all costs.”
Why not Universal Health Care with a $25 deductible after the first annual visit?