The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
The Largest Selection of Liberal-baiting Merchandise on the Net!
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email

AmSpecBlog

Specter's Choice

Clearly, Arlen Specter was facing a tough primary fight against Pat Toomey and from his statement it's pretty clear he determined that he couldn't win as a Republican. But it's no guarantee that he'll be able to win the Democratic nomination so easily either, especially given his vow not to reverse his position on card check yet again. If Specter had made this party switch right after his vote in favor of the stimulus package, and before he decided to oppose card check, he would have been in a far better position to claim the Democratic nomination. Now, as Kos writes:

Interestingly, he remains a foe of EFCA, which means that labor is free to fund and help a real Democrat in the Democratic primary. Bizarre choice. Had he decided to back EFCA, as he has always done so in the past, he'd have labor's full support. Now, he gives the opposition an opening to take him out in the Democratic primary.

This is a huge blow for Republicans hoping to stop Obama's agenda in the Senate. Specter had been moving to the right on issues such as card check because he was concerned about the challenge from Toomey, but if he's facing a tough battle against a liberal opponent in the Democratic primary, the opposite dynamic comes into play and he's likely to move even further to the left. The only way he'll get the Democratic nod is if he reliably votes with the administration.

Comments

Pingback| 4.28.09 @ 1:00PM

Specter’s Choice | But As For Me links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…Specter was facing a tough primary fight against Pat Toomey and from his statement it’s pretty clear he determined that he couldn’t win as a Republican. But it’s no guarantee… → Read full article… Specter’s Choice Tags: Arlen Specter, Guarantee, Pat Toomey Leave a Reply Click here to cancel reply. Name (required) Mail (will not be published) (required) Website Recent Features Joke of the…

Eric Damon| 4.28.09 @ 1:28PM

I don't know that Specter would have been any help in stopping the filibuster, because he has been a Donkey in Elephant's clothing for a long time now. Just becuase he switched his stance on card-check does not mean that he would be siding with the GOP on anything else that matters. It is better to have him switch sides and KNOW that he isn't voting with you, than to have him remain in the Party and have to HOPE he won't sell you out when it matters the most.

Good riddance to a man who put his own electoral viability ahead of any principle she may have held.

Pingback| 4.28.09 @ 2:12PM

Below The Beltway » Blog Archive » Specter Switches Parties, Republicans Even More Sc links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…story on the right is pretty predictable. Michelle Malkin called Specter the head of the “Turncoat Caucus”, for example. Other conservatives aren’t celebrating, though, Philip Klein had this to say at the American Spectator: This is a huge blow for Republicans hoping to stop Obama’s agenda in the Senate. Specter had been moving to the right on issues such as card check because he was concerned about…

bd57| 4.28.09 @ 2:26PM

I think I agree with Eric here.

Depending upon Specter voting to uphold a filibuster is a dodgy strategy at best.

Where the stimulus bill was concerned, Republicans only hope of influencing the legislation was for the Senate to stand firm after the House Republican caucus threw down the gauntlet.

Rather than hold out for some real concessions, Specter (and our friends from Maine) bailed on "the team" - - - what had been an opportunity to "have influence" was turned into a "mere gesture."

These days, "Moderate Republican" is defined as "reliably Republican on the easy votes, votes with Democrats to provide 'bi-partisan' cover on the hard ones."

Dennis D| 4.28.09 @ 3:23PM

A Dem supermajority will be fine in the short term. They have no excuses then. They cannot blame the GOP for obstruction . They can implode by themself with no excuses for failure. None.

groupshoes| 10.21.09 @ 9:36PM

Nice airtical, i would like to tell all of my friends about it. By the way, i would like to introduce everyone of you a very nice website, it offers cheap air max trainers for men and women. Such as Air max 1, air max 2, air max 90, nike air max 2009+, air max 2010 new, nike air max TN, nike air ltd trainers, air max 95. Dunk SB shoes, nike shox shoes. You can find almost all the nike series there, in huge collection and varies colorways. They have Latest style and classic style. Though their price are low, don't worry about it's quality. They are realll ones!!! I have bought from them for so many times, and very satisfied with the their goods and service. Come on, you'll love it.

Leave a Comment

ADVERTISEMENT

Knowing What They Have to Say

Robert P. Kirchhoefer

* * * *

MK Ham on Holder

Quin Hillyer

* * * *

Daily Must-Reads

Brian O'Connell

* * * *

Why Schiavo Mattered

Quin Hillyer

* * * *

Bo Versus Beau

Shawn Macomber

* * * *

Amazing Revkin Hard at Work

Paul Chesser

* * * *

The Day Ahead: November 23

Maia Lazar

* * * *

No More Mr. Nice Charlie?

Larry Thornberry

* * * *

The Evening Keynote

Rep. Mike Pence

* * * *

The Girl Who Cried Racism

Christopher Orlet

* * * *

The 12 C's of Climate Alarmism

Paul Chesser

* * * *

So Sioux Me

Mark Hyman

* * * *

Methodist Madame

Mark Tooley

* * * *

Advent Is Coming

Jonathan Aitken

* * * *

Imperial Hypocrisy

Ralph R. Reiland

* * * *
ADVERTISEMENT