When is a union not a union? When it decides that organizing a
majority of workers is too much trouble and that it can win more
money from lawsuit settlements with employers than by collecting
dues. Even better, operate as a non-profit and receive donations
from foundations and community groups trying to “do good.” And of
course don’t forget money from taxpayers via government grants.
Enter the Restaurant Opportunities Centers United and its
affiliate local chapters (ROC,) a self- described national
organization dedicated to the needs of restaurant workers. ROC,
which has strong ties to unions such as UNITE-HERE Local 100, seeks
to pressure restaurants into acceding to union demands without the
unions having resort to traditional organizing tactics.
As ROC co-founder and co-director Saru
Jayaraman explains, “One difference between us [ROC] and
a union is that in a union you have to get a majority of a shop….
In our case we just get a group of workers, but not necessarily the
majority.” The pro-union news website Dollars
and Sense, which interviewed Jayaraman, calls this approach
“minority unionism,” noting that ROC-NY, ROC’s New York affiliate,
“gets workers to act like a union even where the workers have not
been legally recognized as a collective bargaining
unit.”
Instead of organizing workers, ROC seeks to intimidate
restaurant owners into settlement agreements.
According to Crain’s New York, ROC-NY has obtained $5
million in settlements from nine separate campaigns. As
Crain’s describes it, a ROC campaign “often includes noisy
and prolonged protests outside the eatery. Settling is often the
less expensive option for restaurateurs mindful of their brand’s
image and the cost of a long court fight.”
ROC conducts campaigns of harassment — including
picketing, media attacks, and lawsuits — against targeted
restaurants, hoping to damage their business to the point that they
capitulate. The pressure tactics are calculated to drive away
customers — the very customers on whom restaurant employees depend
for tips and income.
In a pending case against ROC-NY, the restaurant company
B&B Hospitality Group, accused ROC-NY of for engaging in a
“campaign of unlawful harassment, intimidation, vandalism, and
violence toward [B&B Hospitality Group LLC] and their employees
and customers” that included “employing ‘rent-a-mobs’ consisting of
ROC-NY members, union operatives, students, and political activists
— with almost no actual restaurant workers” for weekly
demonstrations outside targeted restaurants.
In early December ROC published its
ROC National Diner’s Guide 2012, which purports to
“separate the good guys from the bad” and “find restaurants that
are doing right by their workers.” In addition to paid sick leave,
opportunities for advancement and wages, points were awarded for
“restaurants belonging to ROC’s Restaurant Industry Roundtables.”
Translation: If you are in the club you will get a good
score.
Almost every award winner played ball with ROC. A few even
failed a majority of the other criteria. Largely, restaurants in
the guide were either heroes or villains, getting top ratings or
failing miserably. So much for a non-biased assessment.
What’s in it for the workers on whose behalf ROC claims to
be fighting? A clue to that may be Colors, a restaurant ROC itself
started to which it, unsurprisingly, awarded top honors. ROC
created Colors as a worker-owned cooperative to be governed by a
committee and pay better than average wages. Workers would need to
contribute 100 hours of work in order to buy their way into the
co-op (considerably reducing their total pay).
Tasks to be performed during these “buy in hours” include
catering, attending protests, and conducting surveys. One employee
characterized the arrangement as
exploitative to workers, saying it would “enslave them
to do things they don’t want to do.” Colors has had several
problems since opening. The utopian experiment has been in
financial trouble, accused of employee mistreatment,
subject to
worker protests, and
forced to reduce pay.
The ROC guide is less a guide of restaurant ethical
practices than a list of who is — and who isn’t — playing ball
with ROC.
Mike 3/505| 1.11.12 @ 7:57AM
Socialistic practices don't work? Who woulda thunk that?
John Navratil| 1.11.12 @ 8:15AM
There is nothing wrong with Colors. It just hasn't had time to work, the right people aren't in place, and those in place haven't worked hard enough. We should up the entry to one-hundred fifty hours to get really committed people and not just some opportunists who want to get on board a good thing early and exploit the workers. A "Living Wage" ordinance will fix it. We'll get to the city and pass an ordinance mandating a percentage of all catering contracts go to "alternatively organized" restaurants.
After this, we are going into the day-care business.
WRTolkas| 1.11.12 @ 9:14AM
Wasn't this a tactic used by organized crime: the protection racket?
Darin| 1.11.12 @ 9:38AM
My thoughts exactly. As such, wouldn't RICO come into play? Could be an interesting case as conviction under RICO would end the legal existance of ROC and provide legal precident against any son-of-ROC organization.
crookedwren| 1.11.12 @ 9:56AM
Yep. In Michigan, I believe, the unions got the day-care people, many of whom were little independent Moms -- they were harassed for thousands of "dues" when they weren't asked if they wanted a union, they weren't aware there WAS a union.
So, yep, ROC will over after them and put them out of business, too.
Nice work, ROC. And you call business people "greedy" and "exploitive." Hmmm.
David W| 1.11.12 @ 11:07AM
Sounds like a good candidate for a RICO lawsuit... oh wait, that would require Eric Holder to actually do his job as Attorney General and protect the rights of normal citizens. Never mind.
David| 1.11.12 @ 1:13PM
Unions screw up everything they touch.
cicero| 1.11.12 @ 4:32PM
crookedwren; you have the Michigan thing a little wrong. The unions didn't harass the day care providers to pay union dues. The State, under Dem. Gov. Granholm (you all remember her? The beauty queen that everyone wanted to change the Constitution for so she, who was born in Canada, could run for the Presidency), just automatically deducted the dues from the compensation the state sent to the day care operators for watching the little darlings.
Of course, that begs the question of why in the hell the State is paying for someone's kids' daycare. But that is another issue.
POST American| 1.11.12 @ 11:36PM
-------------------BOTTOM LINE-----------------------
Meanwhile, our insoluble RED China
TREASON OP issue could be solved
instantly, to everyone's satisfaction,
by simply demanding the RED Chinese
pay the American living wage to their
slaves.
AGAIN kiddies -------this is TREASON
------------------Global TREASON----------------------
This is to be the ULTIMATE 'revolution'
----everywhere, on every level, in every way,
a war against ALLLLL that's genuine
---------against ALLLLLL that was.
A 'hundred years war' ---and EUGENICS.
The last war.
---------THE WAR AGAINST THE WORLD---------
----------------HUAC/ Nuremberg 2012---------------
Chris| 1.12.12 @ 10:58AM
Restaurant owners should start a campaign with this Motto against every THUG MOBBED-UP UNION in this Country.
Come On In--- Enjoy Our All You Can Eat"Bread- Butter-BULLETS" 'entree! Bada Bing Oh So Good!