- Home
- About Us
- Contributors
- Departments
- Topics
- Back Issues
- Weekly Archives
- AmSpecBlog
- Subscribe
- Newsletter
- Advertise
- Donate
- Contact Us
- Daily Digest
- Templeton Essays
search
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
The Obama Watch
Abortion Haunting Obama
Could abortion deep-six Democrats' efforts to overhaul the nation's health care system?
Probably not, but strife over the issue has already helped delay Congressional action until after the August recess. And it could play an even larger role as debate continues this fall.
It's not a far-fetched idea to assume that health care reform could become a catalyst for government-subsidized destruction of unborn human life. Although President Barack Obama has soft-peddled the abortion issue since taking office (rescinding the Mexico City Policy being one exception), he's known for dispensing kickbacks to his liberal supporters, namely through stimulus legislation. It's not unreasonable to assume he would use health care reform similarly.
A coalition of Catholic Bishops, concerned about that possibility, sent a letter to Congress and the White House in mid-July demanding that health care reform "excludes abortion coverage or any other provisions that threaten the sanctity of life."
Religious conservatives aren't the only political demographic uneasy with the abortion implications of Obama's health care revamp, either. In late June, about two dozen House Democrats sent a letter to Nancy Pelosi pledging opposition to any reform bill that includes abortion coverage.
More recently, conservative-leaning Democrats have kicked up some dust over what they see as a "hidden mandate" for abortion coverage in the president's health care proposals. No legislation mentions abortion by name, which opens the door for more government-funded abortions, they say. Some pro-life Democrats want a provision specifically excluding abortion from reform efforts.
Obama has complicated the issue by declining to clarify his position. Asked by CBS whether he would support or oppose federally funded insurance coverage for abortion, Obama straddled the fence. He reiterated his pro-choice position but emphasized that Washington, historically, doesn't finance "abortions as part of government-funded health care."
Well, we already knew that. How about a definite stance on the issue, Mr. President?
Obama's staff has also been less than forthright the American people. Appearing on a recent edition of Fox News Sunday, the president's budget chief, Peter Orszag, refused to rule out abortion coverage from a health care overhaul, but he squirmed out of giving a definite yes or no answer.
"I am not willing to say explicitly that right now," he said when asked whether the White House opposed including abortion coverage. "It's obviously a controversial issue, and it's one of the questions that is playing out in this debate."
It's an ironic situation. The White House has sent signals that it plans to avoid opening new fronts in the culture war, at least for the time being. One prime example is Obama's refusal to push the Freedom of Choice Act in the near future. But much as he tries to avoid it, the abortion controversy keeps coming back to haunt him.
Once Congress again takes up health care reform in September, the issue could play an even larger role. House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer recently admitted that federal funding for abortion has become a hot potato in the Democratic Caucus. It has the potential to be one of several factors that could further delay, or even permanently derail, the president's efforts.
The Achilles' heel might be Blue Dog Democrats, who hail from conservative districts where a vote for taxpayer-funded abortions could mean the end of their political fortunes in the mid-term elections next year.
Polling is already trending in favor of Republicans and against Democrats. The president's approval rating has declined steadily since January, and a new Associated Press survey finds that a majority of Americans are back to thinking the country is headed in the wrong direction.
Obama has little to worry about -- his name isn't on the ballot for several years -- but House Democrats don't have that luxury. In particular, the Blue Dogs are being forced to weigh the political pressure coming from Congressional leaders and the White House with the political reality of their districts.
Already, some conservative Democrats in the House have taken heat for voting in favor of cap-and-trade. And no matter how hard the president and Democratic leadership push, they won't want to add a yes vote on federal funding for abortion to their list of legislative sins.
Comments
Leave a Comment
Related Articles
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
JP| 7.27.09 @ 7:18AM
As Obama Cheerleader Peggy Noonan asked last week, how stupid can the Democrats be? Well, Planned Parenthood is beginning a long demographic and economic decline. They poured millions into the Obama campaign and expect results. Obamacare would permanently given them a subsidy, as well as lay the institutional framework to "encourage" abortions over childbirth -especially amongst teenage minorities (I can just see a national healthcare board making the policy to cover a $500 abortion over a $10,000 childbirth).
Yes, from a political standpoint it was simply ignorant to include federal funding for abortion in the Bill (at least the language was there). But from a quid-pro-quo point of view it was totally expected. The result was an unexpected wake-up call to the Pro Life coalition last week. Blue Dog Democrats saw thier phones and emails flooded from Pro Life voters. The Pence Amendment (which saw the permanently defund subsidies to Planned Parenthood) was defeated last Thursday, but it did light a fire in the Pro Life movement.
Speaker Pelosi may still yet prevail with a floor vote by weeks end. If she is successfull, it will be a 2 edged sword, as the majority of her Blue Dog Dems (about 57) will surely go down in defeat next year. Who knows, she may find her large 100 seat majority in the House whittle down to less than a dozen seats come Jan 2011.
Pingback| 7.27.09 @ 7:39AM
UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES: Abortion Haunting Obama links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
HSR0601| 7.27.09 @ 7:42AM
Let's put aside some distractions caused by the health industry-sponsored Democrats, and the controversial analysis of CBO on the economic effect of the proposed independent advisory council and how to empower it substantively, get back to focus on how to meet the goal of deficit-neutral.
The House leaders reached a deal on Medicare payments: A "Pay for Value" reimbursement system that rewards doctors and hospitals that achieve the best outcomes at the lowest cost.
As a result, The House gained a lot of votes, a lot of people who were withholding support.
The federal Medicare program insures some 44 million elderly and disabled Americans at an annual cost of $450 billion, almost one-fifth of total U.S. health care spending.
Supporters of the agreement say it could save the Medicare System more than $100 billion a year and improve care, that means $1trillian over a decade. (Please visit http://www.kare11.com/news/news_article.aspx?storyid=820455&catid=391 for detailed infos)
The Times in a July 7 editorial argued “As much as 30 percent of all health-care spending in the U.S. -some $700 billion a year- may be wasted on tests and treatments that do not improve the health of the recipients,” Thus the remaining $239 billions over a decade do not matter.
No one can disagree with this best outcome / evidence-based system, and private insurance, too, will be greatly influenced by this change with the focus on value over volume. !
Dr. Armadio at Mayo clinic says, "If we got rid of that stuff, we save a third of all that we spend and that is 2.5 trillion dollars on health care. A third of that and that is 700 billion dollars a year. That covers a lot of uninsured people."
THANK YOU !
Michael Tomlinson| 7.27.09 @ 7:58AM
So-called "conservative leaning" (BS) Democrats or the blue dogs will based on their lack of integrity and character vote for Obamacare. The blue dogs are yellow dogs and that means they're as useless Obama himself.
shaggydavE| 7.27.09 @ 8:48AM
Strictly speaking, how is the doctor supposed to be sure that a test is unnecessary when he hasn't seen the results? Many tests are ordered just to cover the doctor's butt in case of lawsuit, but imagine for a moment that a patient comes into the ER with chest pain. The doctor will certainly order a test panel of cardiac markers (troponin, CK-MB) to determine whether a heart attack has occurred. If the patient is overreacting to a particularly bad case of heartburn the doctor will have ordered unnecessary tests. A great many tests are ordered just to rule out certain possibilities and no responsible overseer of healthcare would deny the doctor the ability to order whatever test they deem necessary.
Spicy Joker| 7.27.09 @ 9:56AM
The Blue Ball Democrats are a bunch of Southern liberals masquerading as conservatives because liberals aren't popular in the South. They will ultimately do whatever Rahm Emmanuel and David Axholerod tell them to do.
Franklin Floyd| 7.27.09 @ 10:59AM
Obamacare is about offing the unborn and the old and giving the finger to the hard-working and the taxpaying.
JerseyJ| 7.27.09 @ 11:08AM
HSR0601 tries to muddy the waters ... "Dr. Armadio at Mayo clinic says, "If we got rid of that stuff, we save a third of all that we spend and that is 2.5 trillion dollars on health care. A third of that and that is 700 billion dollars a year. That covers a lot of uninsured people." "
Actually, the Mayo Clinic states the following ... "Although there are some positive provisions in the current House Tri-Committee bill – including insurance for all and payment reform demonstration projects – the proposed legislation misses the opportunity to help create higher-quality, more affordable health care for patients. In fact, it will do the opposite.
In general, the proposals under discussion are not patient focused or results oriented. Lawmakers have failed to use a fundamental lever – a change in Medicare payment policy – to help drive necessary improvements in American health care. Unless legislators create payment systems that pay for good patient results at reasonable costs, the promise of transformation in American health care will wither. The real losers will be the citizens of the United States."
It's pretty apparent the Mayo Clinic was ticked at our teleprompter-in-chief for putting words in their mouths. Perhaps the lib media hasn't reported that, so you wouldn't know it.
William| 7.27.09 @ 2:25PM
Franklin Floyd|wrote: "Obamacare is about offing the unborn and the old and giving the finger to the hard-working and the taxpaying."
It is also part of a low intensity, covert race war. The older folks and soon the baby boomers who will be denied care are disproportionately white. This is coupled with affirmative action type priorities for the favored citizens.
They do want us dead.
Trust in God and keep your powder dry.
Kent Lyon| 7.27.09 @ 2:53PM
I thought the time for talk was over, and that now is the time for action. Why are Axelrod, Orzsag, et. al., refusing to even state their positions on funding abortions, while calling the issue complex and part of the current "debate that is playing out right now"?
Pingback| 7.27.09 @ 5:54PM
digg » Blog Archive » Roundup: Tiller Murder Suspect’s Hearing links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:
E. Patrick Mosman| 7.28.09 @ 7:06AM
President Obama should call upon Senators Kennedy and Byrd, both elderly and ill, to illustrate the cost savings of his proposed government dictated health care treatment by taking two pain pills and preparing to meet their Maker instead of continuing life sustaining high cost medical care paid for by the gold-plated congressional health care plan. That would be a 'teaching moment'.
Don L| 7.28.09 @ 8:10AM
“...As much as 30 percent of all health-care spending in the U.S. -some $700 billion a year- may be wasted on tests and treatments that do not improve the health of the recipients..."
This, of course, means that the entrenched democrats will be dumping their major cause of such expenses - the AMA.
Tony in Central PA| 7.28.09 @ 9:11AM
One of the biggest inconsistencies in the argument for this plan has been the assertion that there are 46, wait - - now 47, million uninsured Americans. Assuming even if this number is correct, where are the doctors going to come from to care for all of these people ? We have been given assurances that there won't be rationing. How will the claims of universal coverage and cost savings be achieved ?
Once empowered with the complete control of our health care system, I can see the government creating an ever - more utilitarian standard for the value of human life. Old people will be euthanized. The unborn with genetic or developmental defects will be aborted. Care will be denied for long term conditions. There will be no conscience provisions for practitioners and institutions that disagree, since abortion and euthanisia will be deemed " fundamental human rights " by the State.
All of this won't happen immediately, but it would happen inexorably if the State is granted the kind of power it is seeking.
george| 7.28.09 @ 10:16PM
Louis Vuitton , commonly referred to as
Louis Vuitton replica handbags, or sometimes shortened to
Louis Vuitton handbags has become one of the most
louis vuitton outlet luxury brands.
Louis Vuitton salenice
Louis Vuitton for salei like
Louis Vuitton on salegood
handbag salethis way
Patriot Superman| 7.28.09 @ 10:42PM
Abortion should not only be free, but compulsory for any prospective parent with an IQ under 90.
It would disproportionately impact the readers of this website, but the good it would do this society cannot be overestimated.
Yellowstone| 7.28.09 @ 10:45PM
Isn't it about time to kick these spammer's asses back to the rock they crawled from?
sdf| 8.3.09 @ 4:48AM
cmc is a network server, cmc audio rca , also known as Netcom, wbt audio rca and telecommunications, cheap abercrombie is access to the Internet server. If you are a user of audio rcatelecommunications,wbt rca access to the network, wbt binding postsit will be very slow speed, if the user into the telecommunications telecommunications servers, then the speed will be fastwbt rca type sockets, Netcom is also the same reason.
wbt rca type plugsFrom the point of view, CMC is a network for the dissemination of the media.
NFL jerseys| 8.31.09 @ 2:32AM
It is a wonderful article: NFL jerseys,Photoshop CS2,ghd Hair Straightener,Adobe Photoshop CS4.
dropshippngwatch| 9.2.09 @ 12:13PM
Replica Watch
Replica Watches
Fake Watch
Sales Replica Watches
Fake Watches
Fake Watch
Replica Watch
Replica Watches
Fake Watch
replica Rolex watches
Replica Rolex Watches
Replica A.Lange&Sohne; Watches
Replica Alain Silberstein Watches
Replica Audemars Piguet Watches
Replica B.R.M Watches
Replica Baume & Mercier Watches
Replica Bell&Ross; Watches
Replica BMW Watches
Replica Breguet Watches
http://www.dropshippingwatch.com
Wedding Dresses| 9.9.09 @ 8:24AM
Read this article, some knowledge toWedding Dresses
Designer Wedding Gowns
understand, thank you, the author