The American Spectator : The Republican Health Care Alternative

The Right Prescription

The Republican Health Care Alternative

By Peter Ferrara on 5.20.09 @ 6:08AM

Today, the leading Republican health care reform alternative, The Patients' Choice Act, will be introduced in the Senate by Senators Tom Coburn (R-OK) and Richard Burr (R-NC), and in the House by Reps. Paul Ryan (R-WI) and Devin Nunes (R-CA). The bill would assure essential health coverage and health care to every U.S. citizen, without increased federal spending and taxes, and without the federal government taking over your health care. For precisely those reasons, today's left wing Democrats will not support it.

Patient Power

The key to the bill is that it shifts the tax benefits for employer provided health insurance from corporations to all workers. As a result, every citizen not retired on Medicare will get a refundable tax credit of $2,300 per year for individual health insurance or $5,700 per year for family coverage. For workers who don't have insurance now or who pay for their own insurance, that is thousands of dollars a year they don't have today to help pay for health insurance. Workers with employer-provided coverage can keep that or use these credits to purchase their own preferred insurance instead.

This immediately shifts health care power to workers and patients, who would be the ones making health insurance choices rather than employers. All consumers would be free to choose from the full range of coverage alternatives available in the marketplace, from Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) to Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) to standard fee-for-service coverage with different health provider network arrangements. The consumer could choose coverage options with maximum choice of doctors and hospitals and alternative treatments and care, like HSAs, or could choose coverage where the insurer takes responsibility for managing health care in return for lower premiums, like HMOs. Workers can take the health insurance they choose with them when they change jobs, as this new system makes such insurance fully portable.

Under the bill, each state would set up their own Health Insurance Exchange, where insurers could compete to offer coverage to everyone in the state. All insurance offered on the Exchange would have to provide coverage meeting the same standards as the insurance offered to federal employees and members of Congress under the Federal Employee Health Benefits System. This would ensure comprehensive coverage. But insurers could offer, and consumers could choose to buy, insurance coverage outside the Exchange.

The bill would also enable employers to devote a specified amount towards health coverage for each worker each month, with the worker to then use those funds to buy the health plan of his choice on the state Exchange, or outside the Exchange. This could potentially increase employer provided coverage quite substantially, because the employer would not have to carry the burden of choosing and administering a health plan, or commit to paying the full cost of such a plan, with unknown future cost increases. This would be particularly attractive to small and medium size businesses. Yet, the worker would still gain full control and choice over his or her coverage.

States could join with others to form regional Health Insurance Exchanges that would expand insurance options. Consumers in each state in a regional Exchange would be free to purchase health insurance from any other state in the Exchange.

A Health Care Safety Net

Insurance offered on the state Exchanges would have to be open to everyone, regardless of age or health condition. A non-profit, independent board in each state would provide reinsurance risk adjustments among insurers, shifting funds from insurers with healthier patients to those with sicker patients. This would provide incentives and the essential financing for insurers to cover the sickest patients as well as the healthiest. No insurance company, whether offering coverage through an Exchange or not, would be allowed to cancel coverage or charge discriminatory premiums for a covered consumer after he became sick or suffered deteriorated health.

Each state would also set up an uninsurable risk pool, ensuring that a coverage option is available even to the sickest consumers in their state. Those without coverage who suffer costly and serious illnesses could always obtain coverage from the pool. They would be charged what they can reasonably pay based on their incomes, with remaining costs covered by state payments into the pool. States could choose to use some of their federal Medicaid funds for such pools, which already operate successfully in many states.

Medicaid is projected to cost almost $5 trillion over the next 10 years, reaching $674 billion for 2017. Yet, about 40% of doctors and hospitals do not accept Medicaid patients because of the very low payments the system offers them. This restricts access to health care for the poor served by the program, as they have to scramble for short and hurried appointments with available doctors, or wait for available hospital care. The result is worse health outcomes for the poor on Medicaid, including more and earlier deaths from heart disease or cancer.

To address this, in addition to the tax credits for health insurance, the bill would enable low income consumers to choose to receive additional funds from Medicaid to help pay for private insurance coverage, like a health insurance voucher. This would enable the poor on Medicaid to receive the same private coverage and care on the same terms as everyone else.

The bill consequently provides a complete health care safety net ensuring that no one will fall through the cracks without essential coverage or care. The bill assures that coverage is available to everyone, even the sickest with pre-existing conditions.

Health Savings Accounts

Since 2005, HSA coverage has increased 6 fold, growing at a rate of over 30% a year. With an HSA, the worker gets health insurance covering expenses over a high deductible chosen by the worker, usually $2,000 - $5,000. The enormous savings from such a high deductible policy is then kept in the HSA account, where it earns interest tax free. Funds in the account can then be used to pay for health expenses below the deductible, again tax free. The savings are frequently enough to cover almost the entire deductible, and would certainly do so by the second year of such coverage. Money left in the account at the end of the year rolls over to the next year, and can accumulate to substantial amounts over time. The worker can withdraw remaining funds for any personal use in retirement.

Page: 1 2 >

Letter to the Editor

topics:
Health Care, Medicaid, Medicare

Pingback| 5.20.09 @ 6:30AM

Twitted by AmSpec links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

Twitted by AmSpec This post was Twitted by AmSpec - Real-url.org #tcot #amspec The Republican Health Care Alternative http://twitter.com/AmSpec/statuses/1857905816

Pingback| 5.20.09 @ 6:45AM

The American Spectator : The Republican Health Care Alternative :: General Resources links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…Act, will be introduced in the Senate by Senators Tom Coburn (R-OK) and Richard Burr (R-NC), and in the House by Reps. Paul Ryan (R-WI) and Devin Nunes … Original post: The American Spectator : The Republican Health Care Alternative Categories : Featured, General, Health Leave a Comment Name (required) Mail (will not be published) (required) Website Archives May 2009 From one of the top blogs Congress…

notoobama| 5.20.09 @ 6:48AM

I won"t hold my breath on the republicans getting on this bandwagon. Like with everything else, they are weak and spineless and will sit by and watch the dim-o-crats take over this country and drive the conservative party out of existance.

Robert Rosencrans| 5.20.09 @ 6:50AM

interestingly enough, neither the Republican plan nor the Democratic plan call for tort reform. Medical malpractice insurance premiums have forced doctors out of some locations and out of certain specialties. As a result, there is a forced shortage of doctors which causes medical costs to go up. This is but one example.

Real medical equality will come with tort reform, an issue neither party wants to tackle.

Pingback| 5.20.09 @ 7:22AM

The American Spectator : The Republican Health Care Alternative links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…Act, will be introduced in the Senate by Senators Tom Coburn (R-OK) and Richard Burr (R-NC), and in the House by Reps. Paul Ryan (R-WI) and Devin Nunes … More here: The American Spectator : The Republican Health Care Alternative Tagged as: alternative, congress, country, exchange, government, health, house, state, worker Tags advertising america article barack-obama business california cancer…

calotren review| 5.20.09 @ 7:52AM

This is an interesting post. Calotren Supplements can be taken regularly along with plenty of fruits and vegetables. But the effects can be observed over a long period of time. It is pointless to expect the results to be obvious within a few days of taking the drug. The best thing about Calotren Supplements are that it makes fat-loss a completely natural process. You have to take healthy food and exercise a lot besides taking Calotren Supplements.

jim rice| 5.20.09 @ 7:55AM

Yay! The Republicans are putting forth ideas!

And this one isn't totally half bad. I think I can support this.

Pingback| 5.20.09 @ 8:02AM

The American Spectator : The Republican Health Care Alternative | Recent Health News links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…The Patients’ Choice Act, will be introduced in the Senate by Senators Tom Coburn (R-OK) and Richard Burr (R-NC), and in the House by Reps. See the original post here: The American Spectator : The Republican Health Care Alternative Blogsphere: Technorati Feedster Bloglines Bookmark: Del.icio.us Spurl Furl Simpy Blink Digg RSS feed for comments on this post Posted in Exercise, Health,…

Ron Greiner| 5.20.09 @ 8:37AM

A 30 year-old-male can get HSA insurance in Tampa for $57 a month or $684 a year. A $2,300 tax credit would pay 100% of the insurance plus put $1,616 in his HSA at the bank. Of course this coverage would have to be purchased outside of these state exchanges. I have had my HSA since the very 1st day, 1/1/97. America's 1st HSA enrolled at Save101.com

Mike| 5.20.09 @ 8:42AM

So I'm guessing the Republicans are dropping insurance agents and brokers that help people understand complex insurance plans and navigate the treacherous system of healthcare by the wayside?

Ron Greiner| 5.20.09 @ 9:31AM

Mike, the article says,"But insurers could offer, and consumers could choose to buy, insurance coverage outside the Exchange. "

Democrats shy away from the tax free HSAs like vampires to the cross. Rush Limbaugh shys away from the HSA too. So the Democrats and Rush have something in common. Rush keeps the HSA in the half of his brain he has tied behind his back.

Dustoff| 5.20.09 @ 9:40AM

As someone who works in Heathcare. I've seen the medicare system mess & VA. I can only hope the Rep push hard for some type of reform.
Because if you think this system is bad. Talk to most people who have to deal with the VA. )-:

Medicare is just as bad. More and more doctors are refusing to take medicare. It pays so little and with all the government paper work, the pay out is pennies.

For me NO thanks.

PS. Nothing is free.

Pingback| 5.20.09 @ 10:16AM

THE AMERICAN SPECTATOR : THE REPUBLICAN HEALTH CARE ALTERNATIVE links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…in a Senate by Senators Tom Coburn (R-OK) as well as Richard Burr (R-NC), as well as in a House by Reps. Paul Ryan (R-WI) as well as Devin Nunes … Read more: The American Spectator : The Republican Health Care Alternative Leave a Reply Click here to cancel reply. Username (required) : Email (required) : Web Site : Comment : Categories info Tags advertising archives art article automotive…

eshaks| 5.20.09 @ 10:27AM

A voluntary system will never work to cover everyone, why? many, especially the healthy will choose not to spend any money on healthcare, they will take their chances. Insurance works on the principle of large numbers, the more persons covered the less costly it is per person and the more predictable the cost.

Big J| 5.20.09 @ 10:31AM

It sure would be nice to get the health care monkey off my back. As a small business owner, administration is a CHORE! It is really nice to see the Republicans acting like, well, Republicans.

Robert: I agree with you that the majority of the blame in rising health care cost has to do with lawsuit abuse. Just ask any doctor. In case you missed it,

"The bill would also finance specific state programs to end lawsuit abuses and excessive malpractice costs. Each state's health commissioner could appoint an expert panel of three medical and three legal experts to recommend a quick, low cost resolution for each case. States could also establish specialized, expert health courts."

Like Ragu (Prego?): "It's in there!"

Unfortunately, this alternative plan doesn't increase governmental control into our private lives nearly enough, so don't look for it to go too far. :(

eshaks| 5.20.09 @ 10:52AM

I have been in the health insurance industry for over 30 years and I know that advocating a national health care system may be against my personal financial interest however, it is obvious to me that if you want everyone covered the government has to set the rules. I lived in Canada in the seventies and was impressed with their system of covering their citizens primarily through their jobs first and everyone else through a supplementary system. My wife used the system and we didn’t pay a dime. There is still a private system there. You should read surveys of the Canadians if they are satisfied with their system. Also, Canadians on the whole are healthier than Americans, I encourage everyone to read the data.

PeteyUninsured| 5.20.09 @ 10:56AM

Medtipster is a search engine that allows you to type in your drug name, dosage and zip code to search for and locate prescription drugs that are available on discount generic programs across the United States; many of which are available for as little as $4. Prescriptions that are not available on a discounted program often have therapeutic alternatives on a discounted generic program, which are also available on Medtipster.com

http://medtipster.com/search.php

Dustoff| 5.20.09 @ 11:04AM

eshaks
My wife used the system and we didn’t pay a dime.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Why would you post a outright lie. You pay.

Kevin| 5.20.09 @ 11:23AM

The only think I saw in my local paper today was that the Republicans had a plan and that they plan on taxing the benefit to the employee to pay for this whole plan.

Old Texican| 5.20.09 @ 11:26AM

Yes government must level the playing field for any AND ALL insurors.
The one thing that scares the bejeebers out of any insurance company is the concept: ADVERSE SELECTION.
ie: If a particular insuror offers superior coverage
for cancer for instance, cancer patients will soon discover it and flood the insuror with claims that are unsustainable.
HSA's are the best dea that has come along in many years. In only three years our HSA for our employees is self funding for huge deductibles, thus dropping our premiums even further.
In the meantime we paid first dollar deductible costs straight from the company. Finally, our HSA's are structured to be "employee portable"

I am very afraid the communists won't let this bill see daylight, though.
As we discussed the other day "grab'em.........and their hearts and minds will follow".

Vicki Larsen| 5.20.09 @ 11:27AM

I legally immigrated to this country in 2002 from Canada (to marry a U.S. citizen)extremely happy to leave the medical system of Canada behind only to find myself stuck in the same mess here in ID now. My husband is 75 so he is covered by medicare but because I have a pre-existing condition being an insulin dependent diabetic (tightly controlled I might add) I cannot afford medical insurance. This would not be important except for the fact that I was recently diagnosed with breast cancer which my local doctor believes has metastasized. Because I do not have a green card, a point which I mentioned before I was ever enrolled in the Women's Health Check Program I will not receive treatment and will more than likely be dead within two years, just another cdc statistic at the age of 54 . For those saying go back to Canada, the Visa I arrived in the US. on stipulated that it was valid for only one trip south and if I return to Canada the U.S. would refuse me re-entry. I would never receive treatment in Canada in time given the time element involved with the wait times there either. Canada would not accept the test results already obtained here and the results for an initial mammogram take anywhere from five to six weeks after waiting three months just to get on the medical system. Also as a rebuttal to a previous poster, health care in Canada is NOT FREE! Canadians are amongst the most highly taxed people in the world and they also pay a medical premium based on their salary all for the privilege of waiting in line like everyone else, often dying before they reach the front of the line.

Old Texican| 5.20.09 @ 11:31AM

Oh yes the Canadians pay!

We attend medical conventions most every year in Canada and talk to medical people...and patients.
Many have told me the best part of Canadian healthcare.....wait for it.....Detroit Michigan.

Robert Rosencrans| 5.20.09 @ 11:31AM

BigJ: That's a good step forward in terms of tort reform but anytime efforts are left to the states some states will remain jackpot jury states and other states will be prudent. I doubt if that type of jigsaw effort will reduce health care costs.

Old Texican| 5.20.09 @ 11:36AM

You are in our prayers, Vickie.
God bless you for speaking the plain truth in this forum.

Old Texican| 5.20.09 @ 11:40AM

Robert, I appreciate your point, but you have a choice...
Vote with your feet to a prudent State
Or
Vote to be a ward of the Fed. (gulp)

Scot| 5.20.09 @ 1:03PM

Every thing cost. Why do people insist on thinking things are free or should be. If you are not willing to trade value for service then you dont deserve the service. Health comes with a price, how much is it worth to you? You should be the one that decides that not Govt. If you think that Govt should pay (because you know they will tax the rich more for you to not pay) then you dont really value your own life and in my mind are scum.

Dustoff| 5.20.09 @ 1:15PM

Let me ask all who think they well get "great" gov run Health care.

If you do, then ask yourself. Do you think that as the years go by you'll get the same care as say Ted Kennedy or anyone in Congress?

Don't fool yourselfs.

Lisa Lamborn| 5.20.09 @ 1:28PM

Oh, please. Bush passed HSAs and they had to be slid under the SS bill.

Healthcare is about health. Making it political bites ALL of us in the ass every day. Perhaps, to the greater good, if you took the political and religious views out of, and just deduced the best plans for the consitituents the endless wasteful diatribes would end, and people could act accordingly.

Starting with a course in health insurance and how it really works and how you really can figure out what you need, versus what is available might be a good idea. The system sucks cause no one wants to just educate the customer base in the product(s). That just isn't political or party sided. It's common sense.

carolinem| 5.20.09 @ 1:43PM

The Republicn plan is overly complicated, relies on controlling individual states (whatever happened to the return to federalism Republican leaders always tout), and does nothing to rein in out-of-control insurance companies that cheat subscribers and medical providers out of legitimate payment. The major insureres have been the subject of numerous class action and RICOH lawsuits, and actions by state attorney generals, that make the banking crisis look minor in comparison. There is little recourse for patients and medical people cheated by them in the aggregate of billions of dollars. Meanwhile, the heads of these companies reap salaries, stock options and bonuses in the amount of hundreds of millions of dollars. The Republican plan does not address these issues. Until health insurance companies are brought to account, nothing will change.

Pingback| 5.20.09 @ 1:44PM

…(R-NC), and in the House by Reps. Continued here: The American Spectator : The Republican Health Care Alternative Share and Enjoy: This entry was posted on Wednesday, May 20th, 2009 at 5:08 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow…

eshaks| 5.20.09 @ 1:45PM

I did not mean to suggest that the Canadian system is free, I apoogize, there is always a cost but the cost is in taxes and payroll deduction and not in paying premiums. This allows everyone to be covered and not to worry about finding thousands of dollars bancrupting their family when their is an emergency. The question is which do you prefer? The issue that everyone needs to look at is that you are paying for the present system weather you have health insurance or not. One of the things that makes it so inefficient is that most of the people who do not take out insurance are younger and healthier persons so you have a system of adverse selection, older and sickier persons under the system and people only using health services in an emergency. It looks like free choice but your taxes are paying the hospitals covering the uninsured and the undocumented. I have been in the group health insurance field since 1977 and have to explain to companies why their priums were increasing by 25% to 55% each year until this forced almost every company to go into managed care, HMO's and PPO's. Now that is too expensive for companies and businesses.

Tim| 5.20.09 @ 2:32PM

Oh gee, let's see . . . a Republican plan for health care. This plan is just Obamacare lite.

Let's try this novel approach . . . GET THE GOVERNMENT OUT OF THE HEALTH CARE BUSINESS ENTIRELY! I KNOW BEST HOW TO PROVIDE FOR MY FAMILY'S HEALTH CARE!

Gill O'Teen| 5.20.09 @ 3:30PM

Tim, you are 100% right. No plan that puts responsibility for my health in any hands other than mine is worthwhile. If I do not have Freedom, I don't need my health. I do not live to serve the government. I live to serve a Higher Power. If I'm not Free, I'm a slave.

dcd| 5.20.09 @ 3:58PM

I'd amend the plan to provide better information and education on what various insurance actually provide and what an indivdual is likely to need.
Insuarnce companies are very fond of the small print and people are notoriously bad at assessing risk.

Murphy| 5.20.09 @ 4:18PM

Progress ....

At least these fellas admit there's a problem.

Most "conservatives" seem to assume the market can be allowed to solve ever problem on earth.

Rush Limbaugh says he's perfectly satisfied with how things are, and I imagine most millionaires don't worry too much about it. But if you're not a millionaire, and you know that losing or changing a job can eliminate you're ability to see a doctor if you get ill, things look very different.

Now -- if only they'll turn away from their corporate sponsors and seek remedies for the healthcare system that will benefit the middle class, perhaps we'll get somewhere.

Pingback| 5.20.09 @ 4:26PM

Ida proves that scientists are insecure about evolution « Jim Blazsik links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…articles Eco-hypocrisy of the day By Michelle Malkin Limbaugh resigns as head of the Republican Party – Hot Air So Goes California, So Goes the Nation by James Hudnall The Republican Health Care Alternative By Peter Ferrara Possibly related posts: (automatically generated) Scientists Who Reject Evolution You say you want an evolution? Scientists Unveil Missing Link In Evolution Creationism in the…

jr| 5.20.09 @ 4:59PM

I refuse to read about it, explore its possibilities or just think about it until Obama, Reid and Piglosi give the okay. This, only after ABCNBCNPRCBSCNN, Oberman and "dyke" Maddow also go for it, and Chrissy gets a tingle.

Dustoff| 5.20.09 @ 5:07PM

Murphy
Most "conservatives" seem to assume the market can be allowed to solve ever problem on earth.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Many of these problems are GOV driven. Along with the crazy lawsuits that the dem party backs up.

Snowskier| 5.20.09 @ 5:57PM

We have the best medical care in the world due to free enterprise — private doctors, hospitals, and pharmaceutical companies inventing new drugs. This system is now threatened by too much government regulation, Medicare, and Medicaid. The only way to preserve the great quality we enjoy is to reduce the government’s role, not increase it.

A new plan should not be tied to tax credits. Instead, the federal income tax system should be dismantled along with the IRS in favor of a national retail sales tax. This is described at www.fairtax.org

As economist Milton Friedman stated in his book titled “Capitalism & Freedom”, medical care is not a right or entitlement. Any attempt by federal or state government to guarantee it is bound to fail, since the costs to taxpayers will quickly become an unsustainable burden. We see this now, as the cost of Medicare/Medicaid is ballooning out of control. There will never be enough taxpayers to pay for all the things people would accept for “free”.

We need a completely private medical care industry, with competition for customers and price. Taxpayers and purchasers of insurance should not be forced to pay for my medical care if I am an irresponsible drunk, chain smoker, drug addict, or “victim” of self-inflicted obesity. But that’s exactly what is happening right now. And taxpayers and purchasers of insurance should not be saddled with the cost of treating the uninsured, which includes millions of illegal aliens.

steve in ohio| 5.20.09 @ 6:23PM

Tort reform is important, but I don't think it is a panacea. We had modest tort reform here in Ohio, but our insurance rates have continued to climb. Can anybody point to a state where it has worked? Also why are Republicans proposing such a good plan only now when they have no power to pass it. I think we're doomed to socialized medicine and our party will share in the blame.

Pingback| 5.20.09 @ 6:52PM

GOP Introduces Alternative to Obamacare | Jeffrey A. Setaro links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…Americans. Prevents cherry picking by guaranteeing access to coverage. Strengthens the health care safety net. I’m not going try and analyze the Republican plan here, Peter Ferrara at the American Spectator has already done a better job than I could anyway. Suffices to say there isn’t anything new or revolutionary in the Republican plan… It borrows heavily from the plan offered by John…

Pingback| 5.20.09 @ 7:21PM

Right Wing Nut House » GOP UNVEILS HEALTH INSURANCE PLAN links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…Valid XHTML XFN Design by: Hosted by: Powered by: 5/20/2009 GOP UNVEILS HEALTH INSURANCE PLAN CATEGORY: Politics, health care reform Reading through the excellent summary by Peter Ferrara at The American Spectator, I don’t see much new or revolutionary in the GOP alternative. Much of it was offered by John McCin during the campaign. And it appears that the authors of the bill - Senators Tom Coburn…

Tom| 5.20.09 @ 8:51PM

If we end up with govnt healthcare, will the lawyers still be able to sue?
I thought that one could not sue the fed.

Paul from SA| 5.20.09 @ 10:13PM

Many of these sound like good ideas, though I think one of the most important changes made must be to separate employment with health insurance. Drop the deduction entirely or let everybody have an equal, identical deduction.

And we have that pesky problem with all the free medical care we provide to people with no insurance or money. Any ideas on how to tackle that one?

But this is a dream. ObamaCare is coming... along with the most powerful union in the world: The dreaded Health Care Union -- bigger and more powerful than all other unions combined. The Federal budget every year will include a health union bailout.

Paul from SA| 5.20.09 @ 10:17PM

Tom, I would think they will add extra health care legislation to encourage more lawsuits with ObamaCare. The trial lawyers are just as important to Democrats as the unions. It's just a big redistribution scheme.

Pingback| 5.20.09 @ 10:49PM

Health Care Follow-up | NextGenGOP.com | The Future of the Republican Party links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…few people who would have been better off under the nationalized plan. Current Medicare recipients can opt for the private plans with their public funds, like a private school voucher says the American Spectator , helping the poor to get better coverage than they would under a national plan at the same small personal cost. There are several other reform-oriented aspects to the bill and ways in which HMOs…

Pingback| 5.21.09 @ 12:16AM

Inaugural “Renewal Report",” Documents Day’s Best in GOP Renewal - RENEWtv: A weekly links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…in the Senate. Unlike ObamaCare, this plan would maintain and sustain a competitive marketplace, while giving the American people full power over their health. See what The American Spectator has to say here. If the Republicans want to show capitalism operating in its truest form – and if Americans want to see health care properly reformed, this plan is a step in the right direction. And Newt Gingrich…

Jerry| 5.21.09 @ 3:51AM

Vicki Larsen: Very sorry to hear of your predicament. I don't know if they're relevant, but perhaps provisions for the medically indigent in Idaho might be relevant. See: http://www.communitycatalyst.org/projects/hap/free_care?id=0012

siva123| 5.21.09 @ 3:59AM

rightly said hair loss is a common problem and even difficult to deal with. Vitamins are good if taken care to prevent hair loss. even there are other methods for hair restoration, these days different techniques are being used for hair loss.

Len| 5.21.09 @ 6:18PM

Here's an idea, get an amendment passed authorizing the federal government to involve itself in health care. Should I laud these folks for their unlawful infringement, when no such authority has been given.
Government exists to protect the rights of life, liberty and property. When it involves itself in the care of man inevitably someone's right will be violated, i.e., someone's property will be confiscated to provide for someone else. It may done under the cover of "taxes", but there will be mutliple transfers that only seek to hide what is really being done.
Either someone is paying taxes for the legitimate functions of government or they're not. A tax credit merely transfers someone's share elsewhere.
Another way that liberty and property rights are violated is that someone will be forced to provide services at less than what they are willing to charge. Always, somewhere, someone will end up owning part of another persons labor or property.

Len| 5.21.09 @ 6:25PM

Is health care a right? No. Rights are those which man carries himself. He has the right to life. He has the right to liberty, or to move about at his will, he has the right to property, or the fruit of his labors. He retains these rights and is allowed to exercise them as long he does not infringe on anothers.
So to have a right to health care implies that one has a right to make a demand of someone else to take care of them, thus owning a part of that person. When those in government take my money to provide for someone else, my rights, which they are to protect, are being violated, under the guise of doing good. How can a violation ever be good?

TJK| 5.21.09 @ 6:30PM

This is certainly more palatable than the Dems' planned steamrolling (oh, I mean reform) of the health care industry. And this is why it doesn't stand a chance. Look, the GOP can put their options on the table, and in the end, reconciliation removes them from the discussion. Bend over, grab your ankles, and just hope Obama has the common courtesy to give you a reach-around. If the GOP can roll back the tide in 2010, maybe some of this can be undone. But not likely. We need the pendulum to swing so far that the GOP picks up the 51 seats needed to freeze out the Dems. Sorry for the doom and gloom, but my White Sox just got beat 20-1, so everything is looking dark right now...

Pingback| 5.22.09 @ 7:16PM

A Correction | Think Tank West links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…would mandate the creation of exchanges, or that states could choose to create them or not? What if that’s the only language, and there is no mention of states having an option? (What does this guy think?) Suppose the bill summary promises, “Guaranteed access to care…regardless of patient age or health history,” by virtue of the rules it would impose on insurers within the…

Couchrock| 5.22.09 @ 10:50PM

This bill is far from perfect, but better than anything else I've heard coming out of this Congress.

On medical liability, the best reform--and this would apply to all litigation--would be adopt "loser pays," as most other industrialized countries have done. "Loser pays" simply means that whoever loses the case would pay the other sides' attorney fees as well as any other damages that might be appropriate. This squeezes out the frivolous lawsuits. And it doesn't prevent meritorious claims, since plaintiffs can purchase tort insurance--which their attorneys typically cover--at a rate that reflects their expected probability of winning.

Trackback| 5.26.09 @ 7:04AM

The American Spectator : The Republican Health Car..., on alternative, links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

Bookmarked your post over at Blog Bookmarker.com!

GringoBob| 5.28.09 @ 8:32AM

Hold on slick - listen to what you are saying !

Obama told you that the costs of Medicare and Medicaid are "out of control" and will bankrupt America if we don't act fast - Medicare and
Medicaid are Federal Government managed (or mis-managed) programs

Then, Obama told you that we must act swiftly, boldly and decidedly to pass his administration's health care reform package as that is the only possible way to alter the dooms day course of continuing with Medicare and Medicaid - got that straight ?

According to Obama, we must invent nationalized and socialized healthcare (that has continually been tried and failed in Europe) to be managed by the same Federal Government that Obama just told you were "out of control" ? Is this some kind of sick joke Obama is playing on you or does he just think you are so stupid you won't notice that he wants the "problem" to be the "solution" ?

This is a multiple choice answer - so, is Obama;

a) smoking funny cigarettes

b) not playing with a full deck

c) think we are all too stupid to exist

d) intentionally trying to bankrupt America

e) executing one of his many "fuzzy math plans"

f) all of the above

richard| 11.4.09 @ 11:02PM

gringobob-you are right on the money.

Pingback| 6.21.09 @ 5:18AM

Patriots and Liberty » Blog Archive » The Republican Health Care Alternative links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…government takeover bills that would ultimately deprive us of essential health care when we need it most, and to support the alternative patient power approach instead. http://spectator.org/archives/2009/05/20/the-republican-health-care-alt This entry was posted on Friday, June 12th, 2009 at 8:09 am. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback…

dupinghua| 6.26.09 @ 1:48AM

Dream in louboutin shoeslife is christian louboutin shoesthe existence christian louboutinof each christian louboutin shoesstage, louboutin shoes discountthere is louboutin shoesa corner inchristian louboutin sandals
life; exist Sale christian louboutinin theBuy louboutin shoes hearts ofBuy christian louboutin Store you and me; exist Sandals Onlinein your house; exist in your journey ...

dupinghua| 6.29.09 @ 4:44AM

While women prize great accoutrement's of all kinds; louboutin shoesLouboutin shoes found christian louboutin shoesonline can turn a sorry getup into a spectacular one.

Women christian louboutinspend a great deal of time thinkinglouboutin shoes discount about what to buy when it comes to shoes and handbags.louboutin shoes They want to makelouboutin shoe sale sure their shoes looks good, Sale christian louboutinand the bag will make it match. Women try on the footwear and walk around the store to make sure the shoesBuy christian louboutin Store will fit and feel comfortable, and they want to make sure they will look good on. Its much easier to buy shoes such as Louboutins than it was at one time; no more shopping with the crowds Sandals Onlinedown at your local mall because you can do it all from the comfort of your own home online.

DISCOUNT JEWELRY| 7.8.09 @ 5:13AM

discount jewelry, cheap jewelry, handmade jewelry, discount fashion jewelry, china jewelry, wholesale discount jewelry, discount china jewelry, discount handmade jewelry, handcrafted jewelry, discount costume jewelry, discount pearl jewelry, discount gemstone jewelry, discount turquoise jewelry, discount coral jewelry, discount shell jewelry, discount crystal jewelry, discount jewellery, cheap jewellery, handmade jewellery, discount fashion jewellery, china jewellery and so on.

出会い| 7.10.09 @ 2:00AM

あなたの出会いを応援します☆ 出会い逆援助出会い無料出会い系出会い系セフレ人妻セフレ

水　通販| 7.10.09 @ 4:27AM

純天然のアルカリイオン水　通販「金城の華」の通信販売。バランスの取れたミネラル成分を含む「飲める温泉水」として10年以上のロングセラーを誇る唯一商品です。
純天然のアルカリイオン水の６つの秘密で美味しさと健康づくりに最適な飲み物

キャッシング| 7.10.09 @ 4:28AM

債務整理、借金返済の相談が何度でも無料。キャッシング土日祝休まず毎日22時まで。債務整理分野で豊富な実績を誇り、借金の返済に特化した弁護士・司法書士が総勢40名以上在籍する法律事務所。

メル友募集| 7.13.09 @ 10:16PM

おすすめ～♪安心・安全のサイトｺｺでしょ!!!◆メル友募集◆

Pingback| 8.3.09 @ 2:48PM

GOP strategy - disrupted Dem town hall meetings - Page 14 - US Message Board - Polit links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…federal spending and taxes, and without the federal government taking over your health care. For precisely those reasons, today's left wing Democrats will not support it. The American Spectator : The Republican Health Care Alternative The House moved toward passage early today of a $350 billion Republican plan to help older Americans pay for prescription drugs, after a struggle within the GOP over…

Pingback| 8.3.09 @ 4:02PM

GOP strategy - disrupted Dem town hall meetings - Page 16 - US Message Board - Polit links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

Pingback| 8.3.09 @ 4:28PM

Pingback| 8.3.09 @ 4:36PM

Pingback| 8.3.09 @ 5:02PM

GOP strategy - disrupted Dem town hall meetings - Page 17 - US Message Board - Polit links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

Pingback| 8.13.09 @ 7:51AM

FINALLY, A Conservative Health care solution - Political Forum links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…essential health coverage and health care to every U.S. citizen, without increased federal spending and taxes, and without the federal government taking over your health care. http://spectator.org/archives/2009/0...ealth-care-alt June 17th Quote: Some highlights include: ·~"Pools" of insurance. It would let states, small businesses and others group together to offer lower-cost, health care plans.…

Pingback| 8.13.09 @ 8:03AM

…essential health coverage and health care to every U.S. citizen, without increased federal spending and taxes, and without the federal government taking over your health care. http://spectator.org/archives/2009/0...ealth-care-alt June 17th 2009 Quote: Some highlights include: ·~"Pools" of insurance. It would let states, small businesses and others group together to offer lower-cost, health…

Pingback| 8.17.09 @ 8:31AM

How To Locate A Detroit Malpractice Attorney - The Blog Planet links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…all, you really just need to make sure that you find this type of lawyer in Detroit! You may also want to check out: Looking For A Malpractice Attorney In Detroit? Read On! The American Spectator : The Republican Health Care Alternative Digg it Add to del.icio.us Reddit Stumble 0 Comment Leave a Reply Name (required) Mail (will not be published) (required) Website Categories Arts and Entertainment…

dj| 8.26.09 @ 6:17AM

Great!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

er| 8.27.09 @ 7:28PM

Good article
Thanks
games
youtube

Lingerie| 9.12.09 @ 11:12PM

sexy lingerie wholesale lingerie

Pingback| 9.18.09 @ 12:31PM

Partisian Politics...Party of "NO" = A Country Stuck!! - Page 2 links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…federal spending and taxes, and without the federal government taking over your health care. For precisely those reasons, today's left wing Democrats will not support it. The American Spectator : The Republican Health Care Alternative Demo response? Rejected, and treated like nothing was offered. Quote: (CNSNews.com) President Barack Obama and Democrats in Congress -- while pushing their own health care…

ian| 9.18.09 @ 7:49PM

seriously guys? Obama's health care reform needs to go through...and it's gonna happen, whether you like it or not... and this is why it needs to change: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32.....ealth_care

Pingback| 9.21.09 @ 1:32AM

Are There any Alternatives? « The Pugnacious Irishman links to this page. Here’s an excerpt:

…No need to move to a single-payer system (and many a Dem has admitted that a “government/public option” is a good intermediary step to that end goal) to take care of those issues. Here are some alternatives that conservatives have proposed (HT: Wintery). WK also has some good, short podcasts here that might help put things in perspective. Here’s Paul Ryan talking about the…

服装批发| 10.8.09 @ 4:10AM

Your blog is nice,i like it.

discount wholesale| 10.12.09 @ 6:13AM

小语种翻译| 10.20.09 @ 2:33AM

Robert: I agree with you that the majority of the blame in rising health care cost has to do with lawsuit abuse. Just ask any doctor.

Sharp AQUOS 60" LC60E77UN| 11.9.09 @ 4:35AM

this is good.
thanks.

11x17 printer| 11.21.09 @ 4:15AM

11x17 printer

mimi| 12.14.09 @ 8:44PM

ugg outlet

怀孕| 12.21.09 @ 3:33AM

xy280

this is very good

Astaga.com Portal Lifestyle On| 1.12.10 @ 11:40AM

great step for republican at least it can be a positive image for the people for the next election.. Let's Think Out of The Box|Astaga.com Portal Lifestyle On The Net

增高鞋| 1.22.10 @ 1:34AM

What's the point? This has three benefits

法语翻译| 1.22.10 @ 1:37AM

france like it

girl| 1.28.10 @ 5:05AM

http://prettyimpress.com

f4480| 2.2.10 @ 8:40PM

grest share. I like your info

The American Spectator

Comments