Gov. David Paterson wants tolls on the information superhighway
Imagine having to pay taxes to a state you don’t live in just because you do business with someone who does. If you’re an Internet retailer, you don’t have to imagine. You have to pay.
New York Governor David Paterson (D) signed legislation last year requiring non-New York companies like Amazon and Overstock.com to pay New York sales taxes. The legislation is now being challenged in court.
The polite term for this is taxation without representation.
Neither Amazon nor Overstock has any physical presence in New York State. But some of their “affiliate” websites do. An affiliate is a website that links to, say, Amazon products, and receives a small percentage of any sales resulting from those links. Call it a finder’s fee.
Affiliates are not owned by Amazon. They are independent entities. Yet Governor Paterson and the New York legislature maintain that such tenuous connections to their state are enough to force Amazon and Overstock to collect and pay sales taxes on any products they ship to New York.
This is not good policy under any circumstances. During a recession, it’s destructive. When the new law came into effect last June, Overstock severed ties with more than 3,400 New York-based affiliates.
Paying taxes to a government that provides you with services, and where you can vote for or against the politicians setting tax rates, is one thing. But to pay taxes when you get no benefits and no democratic say is simply unfair.
Nor is it feasible. The more states that join in, the more expensive it becomes for companies to do business across state lines.
Already, five states are jumping on the bandwagon. California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Minnesota, and Tennessee all have Internet tax proposals in the pipeline, relying on the presence-by-affiliate argument. More are sure to follow.
Add in cities and counties, and we have about 11,000 sales tax jurisdictions in the United States. Every single one of them could use New York’s logic against outside Internet retailers.
As April 15 approaches, we need no reminder of the difficulties of complying with the tax code. State and federal returns are bad enough on their own. Imagine filling out 11,000 forms every year.
It is true that sales taxes are simpler than income taxes. But 11,000 forms are 11,000 forms. If New York’s tax precedent becomes the norm, that’s what companies across the country may have to go through.
New York’s thirst for revenue is not surprising. The state is in poor fiscal shape. The budget deficit is estimated to reach $13.7 billion this year. Revenues are down and spending keeps going up, even after targeted budget cuts.
The real surprise is that courts haven’t thrown out Gov. Paterson’s sales tax scheme. According to Supreme Court precedent, it is unconstitutional. The 1992 Quill v. North Dakota decision confirmed that a state may only collect sales taxes from companies that are actually located in that state.
New York and other revenue-hungry state governments would like to do away with Quill. They prefer what policy wonks call destination-based taxation. That means that everything that New York consumers purchase would be subject to sales tax, no matter where the seller is.
A man of faith in a godless age is hitting Americans where it hurts.
Mr. and Mrs. American Spectator Reader, let P.J. O’Rourke talk sense to your kids.
In Britain, defending your property can get you life.
The debacle of this president’s administration is both a cause and a symptom of the decline of American values. Unless Congress impeaches him, that decline will go on unchecked. An eminent jurist surveys the damage and assesses the chances for the recovery of our culture.
It won’t take long for conservatives to scratch this presidential wannabe off their 2008 scorecard.
The American Christmas, like the songs that celebrate it, makes room for everybody under the rainbow. Is that why so many people seem to be hostile to it?
Was the President done in by the economy, or by the politics of the economy?
H/T to National Review Online