- Home
- About Us
- Contributors
- Departments
- Topics
- Back Issues
- Weekly Archives
- AmSpecBlog
- Subscribe
- Newsletter
- Advertise
- Donate
- Contact Us
- Daily Digest
- Templeton Essays
Political Hay
Panetta the Spy
Barack Obama's choice of Leon Panetta, the former congressman who went on to serve as chief of staff for President Clinton, to head the Central Intelligence Agency has members of the intelligence community scratching their heads.
To defenders of the choice, Panetta's reputation as a competent manager and loyalty to Obama may help to shake up the agency and keep it from undermining the White House. But several ex-CIA officials contacted by TAS greeted the pick with trepidation.
"Everybody is shocked and concerned about his lack of any intelligence experience," a former senior officer at the CIA told TAS, asking that his name be withheld because he still does some work with the agency. "What kind of signal is this sending?"
One fear the ex-official raised is that the pick is an indication that Obama, like President Clinton before him, does not have much of an interest in intelligence. Another possibility is that Panetta can be a repeat of the failed tenures of Stansfield Turner under Jimmy Carter and John Deutch under Clinton -- both of whom were outsiders brought in to reform the agency.
Initially, John Brennan, who had a strong intelligence background, was seen as the leading candidate to head the agency under Obama, but he withdrew his name from consideration after coming under fire from liberals, who associated him with Bush administration detention and interrogation policies. Panetta has been a fierce critic of such practices.
To skeptics, the fact that interrogation policy played such a crucial role in the selection process indicates that the incoming administration may not understand the broader scope of the agency's responsibilities.
"People think the left-wing bloggers are running the asylum now," the ex-CIA official lamented. "They want to completely neuter the agency."
However, he noted that if Stephen Kappes were to remain as deputy director to run the day-to-day functions of the agency, it would be a reassuring signal to the rank and file.
An additional source of confusion resulting from the appointment is what Panetta's role would be relative to retired Admiral Dennis Blair, who has been chosen as director of national intelligence, a position created in the wake of the September 11 attack to oversee all intelligence agencies.
"When he was chief of staff, Panetta was the gate keeper who controlled the president's schedule," explained another former CIA official. "I find it very difficult to believe that he would be at ease reporting to or through Admiral Blair. Who's in charge? Is the director of the CIA in charge of the final product that reaches the president? Or is the Office of National Intelligence?"
To this former official, the nation would have been better served if Obama had appointed somebody who had CIA field experience, who understood the institutional culture, and who is apolitical, rather than a Democratic Party loyalist who may only tell the president what he wants to hear.
In contrast, Ken deGraffenreid, who was a senior intelligence official in the Reagan White House and also at the Department of Defense during the current Bush administration, presented a critical assessment of the state of the CIA. A significant portion of his workload at the Pentagon involved trying to undo many of the things the CIA did to weaken the Bush administration, deGraffenreid said, including leaking intelligence reports to the media that undermined the administration's foreign policy. This is how deGraffenreid sees the Panetta move making sense for Obama.
"If you put a loyalist in there who runs things, maybe he is in a position to block some of the shenanigans that the CIA pulls," he said. "Panetta is probably a good political move from the perspective of protecting Obama's rear end."
According to deGraffenreid, those in the CIA have lost sight of the fact that they're not supposed to craft foreign policy. "They're out of constitutional control and they've become incompetent at their basic function of getting secrets," he said. "If the criticism of Panetta is that he does not have intelligence experience, my answer is, so what? Let's get down to brass tacks. Does he know what's wrong and is he going to bring that agency under constitutional control?"
While politically speaking it may prove a savvy decision for Obama to have Panetta at the CIA, he said that it's unclear if either the president-elect or his choice to head the agency understands that "it's a Herculean task to do what needs to be done for American intelligence."
"It's unclear to me whether Obama understands the degree to which we need intelligence in this world, because he's mostly a domestic guy," deGraffenreid said. "From the campaign it didn't seem that he had a very realistic understanding of the dangers in this world."
Philip Klein is The American Spectator's Washington correspondent.
Comments
Leave a Comment
Jason| 1.9.09 @ 6:23AM
What I want to know is what are the liberals going to do when the liberal fantasy of a weakened America is fulfilled and there is no one out there to defend America's allies?
http://www.rightklik.net/
gjhg| 11.12.09 @ 3:23AM
VOB Converter for Mac os x is really a great software which can help you convert vob files on Mac to various video formats such as mp4, avi, mov, mpeg-4 etc. It is an all-in-one mac vob converter that can both convert vob video files on your hard drive and convert vob files on dvd disc.
The VOB Converter for Mac is an excellent conversion software for Mac users to convert VOB files to almost all popupar video and audio formats including MOV, AVI, WMV, MPEG, M4V, 3GP, and so on which respectively for iPod, iPhone, Apple TV, PSP, Zune, Creative Zen, various video mobile phones and other popular players.
Deborah| 1.9.09 @ 7:01AM
Mr. Klein, you do a good job of showing both sides of the question in regards to Panetta's appointment. I have been back and forth between these two arguments myself.
The final question raised about Obama's naivety on the question of the country's foreign enemies is a biggie for me. When one considers that Panetta was Clinton's White House chief of staff and Clinton never met with his own CIA chief, one does wonder what Panetta will actually tell the Commander-in-chief.
And, Jason, you raise an excellent point. The Dems want the country weakened both militarily and economically for their own personal party gains. Do they not realize that a weakened America invites more attacks? Some country will fill the void if the U.S. is weakened. Which one might that be? China? Russia? India? None of those options (or any others I can think of) give much comfort.
frost| 1.9.09 @ 8:30AM
The 4th paragraph says a bunch. Yet, can't help but wonder why Porter Goss wasn't mentioned (and, what was the REAL story behind his exit?!?), 'cause, wasn't he supposed to clean out the bureaucratic garbage within? The inmates are running the asylum now, even before the confirmation of Pinetta...
God Help our (once-great) country!
Brian| 1.9.09 @ 8:38AM
Super, an incompetent, unqualified chair-warmer reporting to incompetent, unqualified President Teleprompter.
I can't possibly see anything that could go wrong with that.
Howard| 1.9.09 @ 8:41AM
The more I read and know about CIA the more dysfunctional and worthless these characters appear to be. They spent the last eight years bashing Bush and his policies. Now they get the liberal administration that these Ivy League dandies wished for and they go wobbly. Since they seem to accomplish so little anyways, it ultimately does not matter if Panetta or Daffy Duck runs the Company.
Lu Dumak| 1.9.09 @ 8:44AM
Liberals never look back to see the damages of their actions. Obama is already thinking of talking to Hamas . I guess we will have weather more attacks i this Country.
JJ JR| 1.9.09 @ 9:25AM
Let's be clear--this is Obama's sop to the Moveon.org'ers, Bill Ayers, and the rest of the left wing swill he has associated and aligned himself with over his political career. The agressive, forward-leaning intelligence campaign that President Bush launched after 9/11 is about to be yanked out of existence by Panetta and other Obamamacans like pulling a lawn-mower cord.
Obama is expressly not making the good-gesture mistake that Bush made by signaling intelligence was non-partisan when he kept Clinton's Director of CIA George Tenet. That led to much of Bush's downfall as 2nd and 3rd tier senior CIA officers loyal to Democrats were allowed to reem the Bush Administration over and over again through highly national security comprimising leaks to the "patriots" at the New York Time et al.
The folks at CIA who were on the bleeding edge of executing Bush's intelligence war on terror better wise up and hightail it out of town--Panetta's first job will be to conduct a Stalinist-like purge of these folks.
Then, Panetta will lead a transition to a "kinder and gentler" intelligence operation where going to embassy cocktail parties to recuit spys will take the place of the high-risk/high-gain intelligence ops that have kept this country safe for the past 7.5 years. Worse yet, watch as scarce intelligence resources are diverted to idiocy like "environmental intelligence" to placate the climate change religious zealots.
And when this all leads to another attack on America and/or her interests, the Obama Administration and the main stream media will blame it all on the Bush Administration because their policies so "alienated our enemies. "
Geez--the only way some of this can be avoided is if former Bush Administration officials take the gloves off from day one and broadcast loud and clear documenting what Obama's doing to prevent some of it as well as to lay the groundwork so the inevitable attacks/blame aren't/isn't layed at their feet. Turning the other cheek, as Bush's Christian faith has led him to do so often over the past 8 years, isn't an option!
frost| 1.9.09 @ 9:37AM
Good comments, JJ JR -- especially concerning Dubya's keeping stupid George Tenent around. But I still would like to see an explanation of the Porter Goss resignation or removal.
JJ JR| 1.9.09 @ 9:43AM
For Frost: Goss came in a very experienced intelligence professional having been a CIA Ops officer for 11 years and then having been a member and then Chairman of the House Permanent Select Committe on Intelligence (HPSCI). He came in in part to rain in the disloyal 2nd and 3rd Tier officers and to put a "field forward" mentality into the Directorate of Ops.
He made three BIG mistakes: 1) he brought with him a coterie of snotty Hill aides who completely alienated the workforce and advised him wrongly on many issues; 2) he made some ill-advised internal promotions of corrupt officials (witness, Dusty Foggo, now off to prison, who Porter promoted to the Executive Director--basically runs the CIA day-to-day); and 3) he completely underestimated the stamina needed to do the job (say what you want about Tenet, but he was a bull of a workhorse).
frost| 1.9.09 @ 10:06AM
Thanks JJ JR -- was under the impression that he was going to sweep out the entrenched bureaucrats and get some actual efficiency in there (much like Dr. Rice was SUPPOSED to clean out the State Department). Tenent may have been a workaholic, but sure didn't impress me with any results.....
Basil Plumley| 1.9.09 @ 11:07AM
To JJ JR: Not so fast there.
1) Goss brought his own people because he could trust them. Who would you have trusted at the Agency when many were waging all-out war on the Bush Administration?
2) Would you care to enlighten us as to the charges of Goss being with hookers? Amazingly, those meritless criminal charges seemed to disappear once Goss was jettisoned.
3) Tenet, by all acounts, was a very nice man but he was overwhelmed in his position at DCI. Is it possible to be an incompetent workhorse?
The bottom line is that the CIA is dysfunctional and has been for quite a while. It has been a political circus for much of the last 16 years. Goss tried to change the culture but it was the culture that got him jettisoned.
The sad part is that there are many good people who are working there under the present environment.
Jack Hughes| 1.9.09 @ 11:59AM
If I were to pick a CIA chief, I would choose someone who participated in the Monica cover-up and the pedophile priest cover-up. Great experience!!!
ncatty| 1.9.09 @ 12:07PM
9/11 was an intelligence failure. Who was fired? No one. What an organization! Where else can you have a catastrophic failure in your appointed task and no heads roll?
Jack Bauer| 1.9.09 @ 12:21PM
Leon Panetta, President Derelect Obama's totally inexpeienced, unqualified nomination for the head of the CIA promises Congress that...
HE WON'T KEEP ANY SECRETS FROM THEM
Wow. The putative head of the agency charged with keeping operations secret...
(you're not even allowed to reveal the name of current CIA agents by law)
... boasts he won't keep any secrets.
Holy crapolla Batman.
Basil Plumley| 1.9.09 @ 12:26PM
To ncatty--Name one prediction the Agency has gotten right in the last 20 years?
We forget about Able Danger and ignominy that followed Curt Weldon who exposed our ability to identify the bad guys.
All in the name of the "New Tone". We can't offend the tender sensitive natures of the Left while patting down 83 year old grandmothers in airports.
Is there any reality or responsibility left in Washington DC?
ncatty| 1.9.09 @ 12:29PM
I am with you Basil.
Tokoloshe| 1.9.09 @ 12:35PM
My, my, my.
We have a lot of 'sour grape munching' here!
Keep on munchin, while Obama fixes things.
Jack Bauer| 1.9.09 @ 12:35PM
Basil/neatty.
Ditto
I spent six long years defending Bush fron ignorant weenie welfare addles EUro-trash
Now my biggest two memories are
1. Following possibly the biggest Intelligence failure since ww2, Bush did not DEMAND the head of one person. Starting with Tenent.
2. Border Agents Ramos and Campean will probly rot in jail for the next 9 years while scum get pardons.
Once upon a time honorable people fell on their swords following failure. Now they fall on cushy jobs, golden parachutes, massive pensions, and multi-million dollar consultancy fees.
Michele San Pietro| 1.9.09 @ 12:56PM
Now that a "good" Democrat is the head of the CIA instead of a "bad" Republican, the CIA becomes all of a sudden a troop of boy scouts instead of a bunch of murderers... I think we should get rid of such hypocrites before it is too late. In the next four years, Panetta will definitely disclose a lot of national-security secrets to America's enemies, and this is simply terrible.
Stan Redmond| 1.9.09 @ 1:26PM
Obama's policy suggestions have been proven by history to be disasterous. FDR, Johnson, Carter, Clinton, and regretably Bush's wild spending have show pure economic and military folly.
However Obama's failures will be hidden by the mantra, "Bush's fault."
Thom| 1.9.09 @ 1:26PM
Actually, I have not read one comment since the announcement of Panetta's selection regarding the most dangerous aspect of choosing a known leftist politician to head our CIA: the already-achieved and ongoing infiltration of CIA by Chinese, Islamist, and other enemy case officers and/or their agents.
China has been on an unrelenting intelligence-gathering and secrets-theft campaign for the last twenty to thirty years, depending on the area of penetration or theft you choose to discuss. Estimates of their officers and agents exceeds 100,000 inside the US at a given moment, from the universities to the Pentagon, to CIA and FBI, not to mention the private sector in various high-tech industries. Islamists began in earnest after 9/11, if you read the reports of sabotage of cases by translators and analysts in both CIA and FBI. Along with these go the convictions of the Chinese ring that had our officials sleeping with female spies for years, etc.
Panetta and his supporters may not see this as a threat to our country, or at least not in the same way that others not so enamoured with the old Marxist-based ideas that so intoxicated Panetta's generation might.
It is one of the most frightening aspects of the past ten years, in my opinion. We seem to have widely accepted that we have been penetrated and will continue to be so. We will not know the full gravity of this era until we have a shooting war with China, as is inevitable (over Taiwan, if nothing else), and when that happens, we are likely to suffer catastrophic, history-bending losses, due in large part to that penetration of our agencies and technologies. Similarly, any mass murders of Americans, such as a nuke detonated in a major city by Islamists, will likely be one result of terrorist infiltration of our "protectors" offices.
Panetta and his ilk prefer America to not be the sole, "triumphalist" superpower, and would welcome a humbling of our country from its present position of "hegemony". Therefore, winking at the weakening of CIA from within and without is not such a bad thing, in their likely opinions.
God save the United States, because this administration (or the followers of this latest "cult of personality") do not necessarily care to. Maybe when the merde hits le fan, we can ring Camelot and ask for Princess Caroline to save us with her father's heroic DNA.
JJ JR| 1.9.09 @ 2:19PM
JJ JR back at y'all.
To Basile Plumley in order of your assertions/questions:
1) I have no issue with Porter bringing his own folks in, but his choice of who he brought was just poor.
2) Don't know what in the "wild world of sport[s]" your talking about (wish I did tho')
3) As far as Tenet (the correct spelling), his real sin was not resigning under Clinton when he saw the utter disregard the Clinton Administration had for the Intelligence C0mmunity's mission and people. If he had done that, it might have shown the light on Clinton's dereliction of duty and complete lack of resourcing of important programs. Around 1998 would have been the time--and the country would have had 3 years before 9/11. Tenet was not overwhelmed--he believed he didn't have the legal statutes in place to actually let him function as a "Secretary of Intelligence" vice what he viewed as the largely ceremonial post of "DCI." Recall the Vanity Fair cover in 2002 that had Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Powell, Rice and Tenet on the cover. Tenet had himself identified as the Director, CIA vice DCI--symbolic of his belief that the DCI was a "nothing-burger" role because of the lack of legal authorities.
To Thom: your right that the ChiComms are our greatest peer-to-peer threat (though the Russians are now rapidly catching up), but ya' got the wrong method as the biggest threat. It's cyberspace--they are at war with us there.
TwentyFirstCentury American| 1.9.09 @ 3:27PM
Dear right-wing friends, do you know a polical guy called George H.W. Bush with no CIA spy experience/knowledge once held the same position and proved himself to be one of the best? Imagination is more important than experience or the knowledge it provides, and Obma and his picks have that important ingredient. To quote Einstein, "Imagination is more important than knowledge. For while knowledge defines all we currently know and understand, imagination points to all we might yet discover and create." Americans know that, that's why McCain with tons of experience, but zero imagination lost.
TexasCowboy| 1.9.09 @ 3:37PM
I contend the CIA is doing everything they can to hold on to the Bush tactics of illegal spying. They cannot even get intelligence research correct which costs America the lives of many young men and women, not to mention the hundreds of thousands of innocent people in Iraq. The CIA needs a makeover, they need someone who will no longer allow crimes by our government to continue. I 100% support Obama's choice for Panetta to lead this very disfunctional government organization. The existing CIA, the one for the last 8 years, clearly have disdain for middle america, for rule of law and for doing what is right.
America Being Destroyed| 1.9.09 @ 6:32PM
Panetta, may be the wisest choice of all, the CIA is nothing more than a bunch of criminal organised gang of super crooks and assassins. He needs some one to cover his back.
Each of the Bush family had to murder some one to claim their position. H W Bush, JFK, G W Bush did away with John Kennedy Jr. To be a member of the gang you have to be willing to kill to ear your place at the table.
We can look out for another Assassination to get Jeb Bush in the White House, it may well be Obama. Or Caroline Kennedy.
S.L. Toddard| 1.9.09 @ 8:37PM
"Initially, John Brennan, who had a strong intelligence background, was seen as the leading candidate to head the agency under Obama, but he withdrew his name from consideration after coming under fire from liberals, who associated him with Bush administration detention and interrogation policies"
This blatant falsehood has been bandied about so much it has become the general consensus among the MSM - ahem - "journalists" who believe "journalism" means "the art of acting as a megaphone for the political establishment". The reason it is promoted is obvious - to discredit the few voices in America that still support the Rule of Law, that still cherish our Constitution and still feel that the rights and protections enshrined therein are non-negotiable.
John Brennan came under fire from *civil libertarians* - not because they unfairly "associated him with Bush administration detention and interrogation policies", but because he specifically *supported and defended torture and rendition*.
Basil Plumley| 1.9.09 @ 9:05PM
JJ JR -Mea Culpa, I have just returned to the computer.
As to Goss, there were accusations made that Goss was involved in the same activities as Foggio. Part of the accusations included hookers. This was part of the cloud surrounding Goss leaving the Agency.
Goss was to "investigated" for this activity. I haven't heard anything, have you.
Rumor has it that Kappes-Pillar-McGovern-et al. hung a banner after Goss left which said ....... "Mission Accomplished".
Thom-very good post. I worry that Los Alamos and Livermore will be re-open for business.
jim| 1.9.09 @ 9:45PM
Tokoloshe | 1.9.09 @ 12:35PM
My, my, my.
We have a lot of 'sour grape munching' here!
Keep on munchin, while Obama fixes things.
IGNORNACE is BLISS !
Trogluddite| 1.9.09 @ 11:15PM
...Panetta's ... loyalty to Obama ... means that intelligence will be politicized and there will always be a Federal employee to throw under the bus after the Agency follows the directions they get from the White House to ensure that the Dear leader is not tainted by the logical consequences of the decisions his team makes.
Robert Rosencrans| 1.10.09 @ 8:12AM
When CIA employees aren't being encouraged to make quilts like they were under Clinton (True story) they will be encouraged to engage in other self loathing techniques. It will become just another version of Hate America First, if it hasn't already.
gazinya| 1.10.09 @ 12:57PM
It would seem The Obama didn't get out much while palling around with the Chicago mob. Since all of his 'New Ideas, New Vision' team is the same incompetents from the Clinton days it would seem O lacks imagination. Watching The Obama want to jump in with both feet on spending our way to prosperity and 'one pres at a time' on foriegn affairs his focus on what HE thinks is important is limited to 'changing the USA to a socialist state. Maybe that is how he plans to make nice with our enemies.
Political Crooks Rule| 1.10.09 @ 3:22PM
We speak about One World Order, one world Global economy. Global Banking system, if that is the case, you only need one set of crooks, to rob every one of their investments. The Banking crisis proves my point clearly.
Satans Kingdom is EXPOSED| 1.10.09 @ 3:41PM
Obama has engaged all the enemies of the state, to destroy America and finish off an empire already on its knees monetarily, economically, morally, and socially.
If Americans have been dumb down enough he has nothing to fear. Obama has been selected to find out the levels of madness amongst the American people.
Genocide is being exposed, American state terrorism being exposed, who runs the planet that has created animal extinctions, plant extinctions, pollutions, cancer forming Uranium bombings, to kill the children of the future, poisonous gasses to cause autism, occult sacrifices of children kidnapped all across America, to feed the AIPAC occult societies.
ruth| 1.10.09 @ 8:55PM
I feel much better now--imagination will save us!
Alan Brooks| 1.10.09 @ 9:25PM
Yeah Daffy its our fault not yours. your country is soooo innocent.
Jack Hughes mentions a pedophile priest coverup. but being a molester isnt wrong if youre Michael Jackson-- then you dont really have to cover up you just pay the boy's family off, say, like.
This is now the 21st century and we are liberating ourselves from outmoded puritanical mindsets. Its a brave new world.
Liberal Mark| 1.10.09 @ 11:09PM
It's odd you kooks complain about Panetta and dont say a word about George Tenent and his "Slam Dunk". Kinda odd!
Deborah| 1.11.09 @ 7:29AM
Why is it that a liberal always want to change the conversation. Hey, Liberal Mark, we had no great love for Tenent (Clinton holdover) either, but you see, this isn't the topic.
Alan Brooks| 1.11.09 @ 12:55PM
its the past, marky baby, tenent is history. lets moveon to Now.
9 days to Obama's intel. dont ball it up dudes. gotta be on the ball, boy.
turn and
face the strain
ch ch ch changes.
Marc Jeric| 1.11.09 @ 2:28PM
Panetta - the CIA chief? That far-left operative who defended the disbarred felon Clinton by besmirching his accusers; he believes that terrorists are legitimate fighters who should be defended by the ACLU and judged by Clintonista judges. And, of course, those subhuman monsters should be compensated by multi-million dollar fines against Bush Administration.
Bush, a typical Republican "gentleman", left those 6,000 Clinton appointees in the government (including CIA) to destroy his administration, often by directly helping the terrorists, instead of performing a giant purge.
My hope is that soon we will witness the nepharious influence of Abu Hussein from Kenya and his marxist revolutionaries on the health and prosperity of this unfortunate nation.
Michele San Pietro| 1.11.09 @ 5:16PM
George Bush sr. was a great leader of the CIA. Leon Panetta will definitely be a very bad one.
Alan Brooks| 1.11.09 @ 6:58PM
so Panetta's interim head of CIA?
yep. must be. they come and go.
Wil| 1.12.09 @ 9:32PM
Hopefully Americans will be able to find a good solid middle its time to stop bickering and figure America out and the truth is both sides are going to have to make comprimises. I hope that Obama will be wise enough to listen to his conservative countrymen.
sdfas| 8.1.09 @ 2:43AM
CMC in the food industry
cmc audio rca has a food-thickening, emulsifying, given the shape of water, stability, and so on. Add in the food CMC, food production to reduce costs and improve food-grade and improve the taste of food, but also to extend the shelf life of foods is the ideal food industry food additiveswbt audio rca, can be used in a variety of solid and liquid beverages, canned , candy, cakes, meat, biscuits, instant noodles,卷 quick cooking food, snack food and frozen soy milk, yogurt, peanut milk, tea, fruit juice, such as in food production.
Acidic milk drink is a milk-based drinks deployment, performance for the sweet-sour taste is a kind of water, milk (or milk powder, yogurt after fermentation inactivated), emulsion stabilizers,audio rca citric acid, fruit flavors, synthetic pigments such as raw material, processed from the drinks. Acidic milk drink in the use of wbt rca, the stability of beverage organizations can play the role of the state, to prevent wbt binding postsprecipitation layered drinks, to improve taste, increase the heat capacity and so on. In the production process, some acid milk beverage enterprises to adopt a single CMC as a thickening stabilizer; some companies will be the CMC and other thickening stabilizer, emulsifier compound together, for the production of acid in milk drinks. Acidic milk drink in the use ofwbt rca type sockets, can choose to use acid-based CMC, model FM9, FFH9, the use of materials in wbt rca type plugsaccordance with the total volume of 0.4% ~ 0.5% in the calculation. Material in the process, the first CMC in aqueous solution with the ingredients mixed cylinder of raw materials, and then, in the case of constant stirring, slowly adding citric acid solution of citric acid in order to prevent the occurrence of flocculation and sedimentation cmc.
Ed Hardy Wallets| 8.6.09 @ 6:21AM
Funs blog
collect bag
Ho jewelry Blog
Our simply
UGG Classic Cardy Boots
UGG Classic Short Boots
UGG Classic Tall Boots
UGG Nightfall Boots
UGG Ultra Tall Boots
UGG Classic Mini Boots
UGG Classic Tall Metallic
UGG Sundance Boots
UGG Ultra Short Boots
tiffany world
ckloo blog
ugg boots
bjknjkn| 8.20.09 @ 2:18AM
Always leading the avant-garde of fashion without compromising traditional craftsmanship of luxury leather goods
Louis Vuitton
Louis Vuitton Replica
Louis Vuitton outlet is also active in other ...
CheapLouis VuittonReplica Handbags,Purses,Wallets Outlet and
Louis Vuitton Replica
Designer Bags,Shoes Outlet Store - discount price is our special offer, ...
Louis Vuitton Outlet
gf| 8.21.09 @ 11:09AM
dropshippngwatch| 8.30.09 @ 9:34AM
Replica Watch Replica Watch
Replica Watches Replica Watches
AJC| 9.6.09 @ 2:09AM
Thanks for sharing the useful information.
everbatt| 9.8.09 @ 10:02AM
Apple A1079 Battery(Apple A1079 Battery)
Hp 436281-141 Battery(Hp 436281-141 Battery)
Wedding Dresses| 9.9.09 @ 10:55PM
Read this article, I see Wedding Dresses
Designer Wedding Gowns
lot of things
fasdfsdaf| 10.10.09 @ 10:14AM
pre cleaner
surge protector,booster cable
fasdfd| 10.10.09 @ 10:14AM
power strip,adapter
saa socket,extersion cord
fdsjk| 10.16.09 @ 4:15AM
shanghai massage
turntable bearings
bnvbn| 10.28.09 @ 3:12AM
AVI Converter,
FLV to AVI Converter,
asdfa| 10.29.09 @ 10:20PM
I feel lucky can read this usefull news. Now I find something what i want to know. Thank you for this great informations.
Free AMV Converter ,MOD File Converter
asdasd| 11.11.09 @ 1:03AM
All the video conversions regarding SWF files can be easily accomplished with this powerful SWF Converter Mac, which supports almost all video and audio formats, and has all needed codecs built in. You can convert SWF to video and convert video to SWF file with several clicks.
iPod Ripper is a perfect iPod copy, iPod ripping software to rip and copy photos, music, songs, video, movie, podcast and TV program from iPod to PC, iPod to iTunes. Moreover, the iPod copy software supports PC to iPod transfer. All the formats compatible with iPod/iPhone such as MP3, AIF, M4A, MP4, MOV and WAV are supported.
jghjgh| 11.16.09 @ 12:52AM
M2TS Video Converter,
M2TS Video Converter
Perfect| 11.16.09 @ 1:17AM
It's really good! Thank you for sharing!
AVCHD Video Converter,
Sony XPERIA Video Converter,
ghfgh| 11.17.09 @ 10:30PM
iPod Touch Converter for Mac,
DVD to iPod Touch Converter for Mac
Supra Shoes| 11.18.09 @ 4:39AM
Supra Shoes
Supra Skytop Shoes
Supra| 11.19.09 @ 2:02AM
Video Cutter|iTouch Converter for Mac