The American Spectator : Panetta the Spy

Text Size

Panetta the Spy

By Philip Klein on 1.9.09 @ 6:09AM

What does Barack Obama's surprise choice as CIA director mean for the future of American intelligence?

Barack Obama's choice of Leon Panetta, the former congressman who went on to serve as chief of staff for President Clinton, to head the Central Intelligence Agency has members of the intelligence community scratching their heads.

To defenders of the choice, Panetta's reputation as a competent manager and loyalty to Obama may help to shake up the agency and keep it from undermining the White House. But several ex-CIA officials contacted by TAS greeted the pick with trepidation.

"Everybody is shocked and concerned about his lack of any intelligence experience," a former senior officer at the CIA told TAS, asking that his name be withheld because he still does some work with the agency. "What kind of signal is this sending?"

One fear the ex-official raised is that the pick is an indication that Obama, like President Clinton before him, does not have much of an interest in intelligence. Another possibility is that Panetta can be a repeat of the failed tenures of Stansfield Turner under Jimmy Carter and John Deutch under Clinton -- both of whom were outsiders brought in to reform the agency.

Initially, John Brennan, who had a strong intelligence background, was seen as the leading candidate to head the agency under Obama, but he withdrew his name from consideration after coming under fire from liberals, who associated him with Bush administration detention and interrogation policies. Panetta has been a fierce critic of such practices.

To skeptics, the fact that interrogation policy played such a crucial role in the selection process indicates that the incoming administration may not understand the broader scope of the agency's responsibilities.

"People think the left-wing bloggers are running the asylum now," the ex-CIA official lamented. "They want to completely neuter the agency."

However, he noted that if Stephen Kappes were to remain as deputy director to run the day-to-day functions of the agency, it would be a reassuring signal to the rank and file.

An additional source of confusion resulting from the appointment is what Panetta's role would be relative to retired Admiral Dennis Blair, who has been chosen as director of national intelligence, a position created in the wake of the September 11 attack to oversee all intelligence agencies.

"When he was chief of staff, Panetta was the gate keeper who controlled the president's schedule," explained another former CIA official. "I find it very difficult to believe that he would be at ease reporting to or through Admiral Blair. Who's in charge? Is the director of the CIA in charge of the final product that reaches the president? Or is the Office of National Intelligence?"

To this former official, the nation would have been better served if Obama had appointed somebody who had CIA field experience, who understood the institutional culture, and who is apolitical, rather than a Democratic Party loyalist who may only tell the president what he wants to hear.

In contrast, Ken deGraffenreid, who was a senior intelligence official in the Reagan White House and also at the Department of Defense during the current Bush administration, presented a critical assessment of the state of the CIA. A significant portion of his workload at the Pentagon involved trying to undo many of the things the CIA did to weaken the Bush administration, deGraffenreid said, including leaking intelligence reports to the media that undermined the administration's foreign policy. This is how deGraffenreid sees the Panetta move making sense for Obama.

"If you put a loyalist in there who runs things, maybe he is in a position to block some of the shenanigans that the CIA pulls," he said. "Panetta is probably a good political move from the perspective of protecting Obama's rear end."

According to deGraffenreid, those in the CIA have lost sight of the fact that they're not supposed to craft foreign policy. "They're out of constitutional control and they've become incompetent at their basic function of getting secrets," he said. "If the criticism of Panetta is that he does not have intelligence experience, my answer is, so what? Let's get down to brass tacks. Does he know what's wrong and is he going to bring that agency under constitutional control?"

While politically speaking it may prove a savvy decision for Obama to have Panetta at the CIA, he said that it's unclear if either the president-elect or his choice to head the agency understands that "it's a Herculean task to do what needs to be done for American intelligence."

"It's unclear to me whether Obama understands the degree to which we need intelligence in this world, because he's mostly a domestic guy," deGraffenreid said. "From the campaign it didn't seem that he had a very realistic understanding of the dangers in this world."

About the Author

Philip Klein is The American Spectator's Washington correspondent. You can follow him on Twitter at: http://twitter.com/Philipaklein

Letter to the Editor View all comments (72) | Leave a comment

Jason| 1.9.09 @ 6:23AM

What I want to know is what are the liberals going to do when the liberal fantasy of a weakened America is fulfilled and there is no one out there to defend America's allies?
http://www.rightklik.net/

Deborah| 1.9.09 @ 7:01AM

Mr. Klein, you do a good job of showing both sides of the question in regards to Panetta's appointment. I have been back and forth between these two arguments myself.

The final question raised about Obama's naivety on the question of the country's foreign enemies is a biggie for me. When one considers that Panetta was Clinton's White House chief of staff and Clinton never met with his own CIA chief, one does wonder what Panetta will actually tell the Commander-in-chief.

And, Jason, you raise an excellent point. The Dems want the country weakened both militarily and economically for their own personal party gains. Do they not realize that a weakened America invites more attacks? Some country will fill the void if the U.S. is weakened. Which one might that be? China? Russia? India? None of those options (or any others I can think of) give much comfort.

frost| 1.9.09 @ 8:30AM

The 4th paragraph says a bunch. Yet, can't help but wonder why Porter Goss wasn't mentioned (and, what was the REAL story behind his exit?!?), 'cause, wasn't he supposed to clean out the bureaucratic garbage within? The inmates are running the asylum now, even before the confirmation of Pinetta...
God Help our (once-great) country!

Brian| 1.9.09 @ 8:38AM

Super, an incompetent, unqualified chair-warmer reporting to incompetent, unqualified President Teleprompter.

I can't possibly see anything that could go wrong with that.

Howard| 1.9.09 @ 8:41AM

The more I read and know about CIA the more dysfunctional and worthless these characters appear to be. They spent the last eight years bashing Bush and his policies. Now they get the liberal administration that these Ivy League dandies wished for and they go wobbly. Since they seem to accomplish so little anyways, it ultimately does not matter if Panetta or Daffy Duck runs the Company.

Lu Dumak| 1.9.09 @ 8:44AM

Liberals never look back to see the damages of their actions. Obama is already thinking of talking to Hamas . I guess we will have weather more attacks i this Country.

JJ JR| 1.9.09 @ 9:25AM

Let's be clear--this is Obama's sop to the Moveon.org'ers, Bill Ayers, and the rest of the left wing swill he has associated and aligned himself with over his political career. The agressive, forward-leaning intelligence campaign that President Bush launched after 9/11 is about to be yanked out of existence by Panetta and other Obamamacans like pulling a lawn-mower cord.

Obama is expressly not making the good-gesture mistake that Bush made by signaling intelligence was non-partisan when he kept Clinton's Director of CIA George Tenet. That led to much of Bush's downfall as 2nd and 3rd tier senior CIA officers loyal to Democrats were allowed to reem the Bush Administration over and over again through highly national security comprimising leaks to the "patriots" at the New York Time et al.

The folks at CIA who were on the bleeding edge of executing Bush's intelligence war on terror better wise up and hightail it out of town--Panetta's first job will be to conduct a Stalinist-like purge of these folks.

Then, Panetta will lead a transition to a "kinder and gentler" intelligence operation where going to embassy cocktail parties to recuit spys will take the place of the high-risk/high-gain intelligence ops that have kept this country safe for the past 7.5 years. Worse yet, watch as scarce intelligence resources are diverted to idiocy like "environmental intelligence" to placate the climate change religious zealots.

And when this all leads to another attack on America and/or her interests, the Obama Administration and the main stream media will blame it all on the Bush Administration because their policies so "alienated our enemies. "

Geez--the only way some of this can be avoided is if former Bush Administration officials take the gloves off from day one and broadcast loud and clear documenting what Obama's doing to prevent some of it as well as to lay the groundwork so the inevitable attacks/blame aren't/isn't layed at their feet. Turning the other cheek, as Bush's Christian faith has led him to do so often over the past 8 years, isn't an option!

frost| 1.9.09 @ 9:37AM

Good comments, JJ JR -- especially concerning Dubya's keeping stupid George Tenent around. But I still would like to see an explanation of the Porter Goss resignation or removal.

JJ JR| 1.9.09 @ 9:43AM

For Frost: Goss came in a very experienced intelligence professional having been a CIA Ops officer for 11 years and then having been a member and then Chairman of the House Permanent Select Committe on Intelligence (HPSCI). He came in in part to rain in the disloyal 2nd and 3rd Tier officers and to put a "field forward" mentality into the Directorate of Ops.

He made three BIG mistakes: 1) he brought with him a coterie of snotty Hill aides who completely alienated the workforce and advised him wrongly on many issues; 2) he made some ill-advised internal promotions of corrupt officials (witness, Dusty Foggo, now off to prison, who Porter promoted to the Executive Director--basically runs the CIA day-to-day); and 3) he completely underestimated the stamina needed to do the job (say what you want about Tenet, but he was a bull of a workhorse).

frost| 1.9.09 @ 10:06AM

Thanks JJ JR -- was under the impression that he was going to sweep out the entrenched bureaucrats and get some actual efficiency in there (much like Dr. Rice was SUPPOSED to clean out the State Department). Tenent may have been a workaholic, but sure didn't impress me with any results.....

Basil Plumley| 1.9.09 @ 11:07AM

To JJ JR: Not so fast there.
1) Goss brought his own people because he could trust them. Who would you have trusted at the Agency when many were waging all-out war on the Bush Administration?
2) Would you care to enlighten us as to the charges of Goss being with hookers? Amazingly, those meritless criminal charges seemed to disappear once Goss was jettisoned.
3) Tenet, by all acounts, was a very nice man but he was overwhelmed in his position at DCI. Is it possible to be an incompetent workhorse?

The bottom line is that the CIA is dysfunctional and has been for quite a while. It has been a political circus for much of the last 16 years. Goss tried to change the culture but it was the culture that got him jettisoned.

The sad part is that there are many good people who are working there under the present environment.

Jack Hughes| 1.9.09 @ 11:59AM

If I were to pick a CIA chief, I would choose someone who participated in the Monica cover-up and the pedophile priest cover-up. Great experience!!!

ncatty| 1.9.09 @ 12:07PM

9/11 was an intelligence failure. Who was fired? No one. What an organization! Where else can you have a catastrophic failure in your appointed task and no heads roll?

Jack Bauer| 1.9.09 @ 12:21PM

Leon Panetta, President Derelect Obama's totally inexpeienced, unqualified nomination for the head of the CIA promises Congress that...

HE WON'T KEEP ANY SECRETS FROM THEM

Wow. The putative head of the agency charged with keeping operations secret...

(you're not even allowed to reveal the name of current CIA agents by law)

... boasts he won't keep any secrets.

Holy crapolla Batman.

Basil Plumley| 1.9.09 @ 12:26PM

To ncatty--Name one prediction the Agency has gotten right in the last 20 years?
We forget about Able Danger and ignominy that followed Curt Weldon who exposed our ability to identify the bad guys.

All in the name of the "New Tone". We can't offend the tender sensitive natures of the Left while patting down 83 year old grandmothers in airports.
Is there any reality or responsibility left in Washington DC?

ncatty| 1.9.09 @ 12:29PM

I am with you Basil.

Tokoloshe| 1.9.09 @ 12:35PM

My, my, my.
We have a lot of 'sour grape munching' here!
Keep on munchin, while Obama fixes things.

Jack Bauer| 1.9.09 @ 12:35PM

Basil/neatty.

Ditto

I spent six long years defending Bush fron ignorant weenie welfare addles EUro-trash

Now my biggest two memories are

1. Following possibly the biggest Intelligence failure since ww2, Bush did not DEMAND the head of one person. Starting with Tenent.

2. Border Agents Ramos and Campean will probly rot in jail for the next 9 years while scum get pardons.

Once upon a time honorable people fell on their swords following failure. Now they fall on cushy jobs, golden parachutes, massive pensions, and multi-million dollar consultancy fees.

Michele San Pietro| 1.9.09 @ 12:56PM

Now that a "good" Democrat is the head of the CIA instead of a "bad" Republican, the CIA becomes all of a sudden a troop of boy scouts instead of a bunch of murderers... I think we should get rid of such hypocrites before it is too late. In the next four years, Panetta will definitely disclose a lot of national-security secrets to America's enemies, and this is simply terrible.

Stan Redmond| 1.9.09 @ 1:26PM

Obama's policy suggestions have been proven by history to be disasterous. FDR, Johnson, Carter, Clinton, and regretably Bush's wild spending have show pure economic and military folly.

However Obama's failures will be hidden by the mantra, "Bush's fault."

Thom| 1.9.09 @ 1:26PM

Actually, I have not read one comment since the announcement of Panetta's selection regarding the most dangerous aspect of choosing a known leftist politician to head our CIA: the already-achieved and ongoing infiltration of CIA by Chinese, Islamist, and other enemy case officers and/or their agents.
China has been on an unrelenting intelligence-gathering and secrets-theft campaign for the last twenty to thirty years, depending on the area of penetration or theft you choose to discuss. Estimates of their officers and agents exceeds 100,000 inside the US at a given moment, from the universities to the Pentagon, to CIA and FBI, not to mention the private sector in various high-tech industries. Islamists began in earnest after 9/11, if you read the reports of sabotage of cases by translators and analysts in both CIA and FBI. Along with these go the convictions of the Chinese ring that had our officials sleeping with female spies for years, etc.
Panetta and his supporters may not see this as a threat to our country, or at least not in the same way that others not so enamoured with the old Marxist-based ideas that so intoxicated Panetta's generation might.
It is one of the most frightening aspects of the past ten years, in my opinion. We seem to have widely accepted that we have been penetrated and will continue to be so. We will not know the full gravity of this era until we have a shooting war with China, as is inevitable (over Taiwan, if nothing else), and when that happens, we are likely to suffer catastrophic, history-bending losses, due in large part to that penetration of our agencies and technologies. Similarly, any mass murders of Americans, such as a nuke detonated in a major city by Islamists, will likely be one result of terrorist infiltration of our "protectors" offices.
Panetta and his ilk prefer America to not be the sole, "triumphalist" superpower, and would welcome a humbling of our country from its present position of "hegemony". Therefore, winking at the weakening of CIA from within and without is not such a bad thing, in their likely opinions.
God save the United States, because this administration (or the followers of this latest "cult of personality") do not necessarily care to. Maybe when the merde hits le fan, we can ring Camelot and ask for Princess Caroline to save us with her father's heroic DNA.

JJ JR| 1.9.09 @ 2:19PM

JJ JR back at y'all.

To Basile Plumley in order of your assertions/questions:

1) I have no issue with Porter bringing his own folks in, but his choice of who he brought was just poor.

2) Don't know what in the "wild world of sport[s]" your talking about (wish I did tho')

3) As far as Tenet (the correct spelling), his real sin was not resigning under Clinton when he saw the utter disregard the Clinton Administration had for the Intelligence C0mmunity's mission and people. If he had done that, it might have shown the light on Clinton's dereliction of duty and complete lack of resourcing of important programs. Around 1998 would have been the time--and the country would have had 3 years before 9/11. Tenet was not overwhelmed--he believed he didn't have the legal statutes in place to actually let him function as a "Secretary of Intelligence" vice what he viewed as the largely ceremonial post of "DCI." Recall the Vanity Fair cover in 2002 that had Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Powell, Rice and Tenet on the cover. Tenet had himself identified as the Director, CIA vice DCI--symbolic of his belief that the DCI was a "nothing-burger" role because of the lack of legal authorities.

To Thom: your right that the ChiComms are our greatest peer-to-peer threat (though the Russians are now rapidly catching up), but ya' got the wrong method as the biggest threat. It's cyberspace--they are at war with us there.

TwentyFirstCentury American| 1.9.09 @ 3:27PM

Dear right-wing friends, do you know a polical guy called George H.W. Bush with no CIA spy experience/knowledge once held the same position and proved himself to be one of the best? Imagination is more important than experience or the knowledge it provides, and Obma and his picks have that important ingredient. To quote Einstein, "Imagination is more important than knowledge. For while knowledge defines all we currently know and understand, imagination points to all we might yet discover and create." Americans know that, that's why McCain with tons of experience, but zero imagination lost.

TexasCowboy| 1.9.09 @ 3:37PM

I contend the CIA is doing everything they can to hold on to the Bush tactics of illegal spying. They cannot even get intelligence research correct which costs America the lives of many young men and women, not to mention the hundreds of thousands of innocent people in Iraq. The CIA needs a makeover, they need someone who will no longer allow crimes by our government to continue. I 100% support Obama's choice for Panetta to lead this very disfunctional government organization. The existing CIA, the one for the last 8 years, clearly have disdain for middle america, for rule of law and for doing what is right.

America Being Destroyed| 1.9.09 @ 6:32PM

Panetta, may be the wisest choice of all, the CIA is nothing more than a bunch of criminal organised gang of super crooks and assassins. He needs some one to cover his back.

Each of the Bush family had to murder some one to claim their position. H W Bush, JFK, G W Bush did away with John Kennedy Jr. To be a member of the gang you have to be willing to kill to ear your place at the table.

We can look out for another Assassination to get Jeb Bush in the White House, it may well be Obama. Or Caroline Kennedy.

S.L. Toddard| 1.9.09 @ 8:37PM

"Initially, John Brennan, who had a strong intelligence background, was seen as the leading candidate to head the agency under Obama, but he withdrew his name from consideration after coming under fire from liberals, who associated him with Bush administration detention and interrogation policies"

This blatant falsehood has been bandied about so much it has become the general consensus among the MSM - ahem - "journalists" who believe "journalism" means "the art of acting as a megaphone for the political establishment". The reason it is promoted is obvious - to discredit the few voices in America that still support the Rule of Law, that still cherish our Constitution and still feel that the rights and protections enshrined therein are non-negotiable.

John Brennan came under fire from *civil libertarians* - not because they unfairly "associated him with Bush administration detention and interrogation policies", but because he specifically *supported and defended torture and rendition*.

Basil Plumley| 1.9.09 @ 9:05PM

JJ JR -Mea Culpa, I have just returned to the computer.
As to Goss, there were accusations made that Goss was involved in the same activities as Foggio. Part of the accusations included hookers. This was part of the cloud surrounding Goss leaving the Agency.

Goss was to "investigated" for this activity. I haven't heard anything, have you.
Rumor has it that Kappes-Pillar-McGovern-et al. hung a banner after Goss left which said ....... "Mission Accomplished".

Thom-very good post. I worry that Los Alamos and Livermore will be re-open for business.

jim| 1.9.09 @ 9:45PM

Tokoloshe | 1.9.09 @ 12:35PM

My, my, my.
We have a lot of 'sour grape munching' here!
Keep on munchin, while Obama fixes things.

IGNORNACE is BLISS !

Trogluddite| 1.9.09 @ 11:15PM

...Panetta's ... loyalty to Obama ... means that intelligence will be politicized and there will always be a Federal employee to throw under the bus after the Agency follows the directions they get from the White House to ensure that the Dear leader is not tainted by the logical consequences of the decisions his team makes.

Robert Rosencrans| 1.10.09 @ 8:12AM

When CIA employees aren't being encouraged to make quilts like they were under Clinton (True story) they will be encouraged to engage in other self loathing techniques. It will become just another version of Hate America First, if it hasn't already.

gazinya| 1.10.09 @ 12:57PM

It would seem The Obama didn't get out much while palling around with the Chicago mob. Since all of his 'New Ideas, New Vision' team is the same incompetents from the Clinton days it would seem O lacks imagination. Watching The Obama want to jump in with both feet on spending our way to prosperity and 'one pres at a time' on foriegn affairs his focus on what HE thinks is important is limited to 'changing the USA to a socialist state. Maybe that is how he plans to make nice with our enemies.

Political Crooks Rule| 1.10.09 @ 3:22PM

We speak about One World Order, one world Global economy. Global Banking system, if that is the case, you only need one set of crooks, to rob every one of their investments. The Banking crisis proves my point clearly.

Satans Kingdom is EXPOSED| 1.10.09 @ 3:41PM

Obama has engaged all the enemies of the state, to destroy America and finish off an empire already on its knees monetarily, economically, morally, and socially.

If Americans have been dumb down enough he has nothing to fear. Obama has been selected to find out the levels of madness amongst the American people.

Genocide is being exposed, American state terrorism being exposed, who runs the planet that has created animal extinctions, plant extinctions, pollutions, cancer forming Uranium bombings, to kill the children of the future, poisonous gasses to cause autism, occult sacrifices of children kidnapped all across America, to feed the AIPAC occult societies.

ruth| 1.10.09 @ 8:55PM

I feel much better now--imagination will save us!

Alan Brooks| 1.10.09 @ 9:25PM

Yeah Daffy its our fault not yours. your country is soooo innocent.

Jack Hughes mentions a pedophile priest coverup. but being a molester isnt wrong if youre Michael Jackson-- then you dont really have to cover up you just pay the boy's family off, say, like.
This is now the 21st century and we are liberating ourselves from outmoded puritanical mindsets. Its a brave new world.

Liberal Mark| 1.10.09 @ 11:09PM

It's odd you kooks complain about Panetta and dont say a word about George Tenent and his "Slam Dunk". Kinda odd!

Deborah| 1.11.09 @ 7:29AM

Why is it that a liberal always want to change the conversation. Hey, Liberal Mark, we had no great love for Tenent (Clinton holdover) either, but you see, this isn't the topic.

Alan Brooks| 1.11.09 @ 12:55PM

its the past, marky baby, tenent is history. lets moveon to Now.
9 days to Obama's intel. dont ball it up dudes. gotta be on the ball, boy.

turn and
face the strain
ch ch ch changes.

Marc Jeric| 1.11.09 @ 2:28PM

Panetta - the CIA chief? That far-left operative who defended the disbarred felon Clinton by besmirching his accusers; he believes that terrorists are legitimate fighters who should be defended by the ACLU and judged by Clintonista judges. And, of course, those subhuman monsters should be compensated by multi-million dollar fines against Bush Administration.
Bush, a typical Republican "gentleman", left those 6,000 Clinton appointees in the government (including CIA) to destroy his administration, often by directly helping the terrorists, instead of performing a giant purge.
My hope is that soon we will witness the nepharious influence of Abu Hussein from Kenya and his marxist revolutionaries on the health and prosperity of this unfortunate nation.

Michele San Pietro| 1.11.09 @ 5:16PM

George Bush sr. was a great leader of the CIA. Leon Panetta will definitely be a very bad one.

Alan Brooks| 1.11.09 @ 6:58PM

so Panetta's interim head of CIA?

yep. must be. they come and go.

Wil| 1.12.09 @ 9:32PM

Hopefully Americans will be able to find a good solid middle its time to stop bickering and figure America out and the truth is both sides are going to have to make comprimises. I hope that Obama will be wise enough to listen to his conservative countrymen.

sdfas| 8.1.09 @ 2:43AM

CMC in the food industry
cmc audio rca has a food-thickening, emulsifying, given the shape of water, stability, and so on. Add in the food CMC, food production to reduce costs and improve food-grade and improve the taste of food, but also to extend the shelf life of foods is the ideal food industry food additiveswbt audio rca, can be used in a variety of solid and liquid beverages, canned , candy, cakes, meat, biscuits, instant noodles,卷 quick cooking food, snack food and frozen soy milk, yogurt, peanut milk, tea, fruit juice, such as in food production.
Acidic milk drink is a milk-based drinks deployment, performance for the sweet-sour taste is a kind of water, milk (or milk powder, yogurt after fermentation inactivated), emulsion stabilizers,audio rca citric acid, fruit flavors, synthetic pigments such as raw material, processed from the drinks. Acidic milk drink in the use of wbt rca, the stability of beverage organizations can play the role of the state, to prevent wbt binding postsprecipitation layered drinks, to improve taste, increase the heat capacity and so on. In the production process, some acid milk beverage enterprises to adopt a single CMC as a thickening stabilizer; some companies will be the CMC and other thickening stabilizer, emulsifier compound together, for the production of acid in milk drinks. Acidic milk drink in the use ofwbt rca type sockets, can choose to use acid-based CMC, model FM9, FFH9, the use of materials in wbt rca type plugsaccordance with the total volume of 0.4% ~ 0.5% in the calculation. Material in the process, the first CMC in aqueous solution with the ingredients mixed cylinder of raw materials, and then, in the case of constant stirring, slowly adding citric acid solution of citric acid in order to prevent the occurrence of flocculation and sedimentation cmc.

Limme| 3.30.10 @ 12:14PM

Käytämme hajutonta ja hyvin korkealuokkaista valokovetteista geeliä, jolla saadaan kauniit ja kestävät rakennekynnet! Hyvä vaihtoehto kynsienpureskelijoille, tai tärkeisiin tilaisuuksiin. Voidaan tehdä myös lyhytkestoisemmat "juhlakynnet" ilman geeliä. Kynnen päällyskerrosta hiotaan kevyesti, jolloin siihen saadaan kestävä kiinnityspinta. Rakennekynnen pituuden muodostava tippi liimataan omaan kynteen. Geelikerroksia kiinnitetään tipin päälle erikoisvalmisteisella valokovetinlampulla. Näin saadaan kynnen muoto ja kestävyys. Valittavissa luonnolliset, kirkkaat ja ranskalaiset eli valkoiset.

gf| 8.21.09 @ 11:09AM

AJC| 9.6.09 @ 2:09AM

Thanks for sharing the useful information.

fasdfsdaf| 10.10.09 @ 10:14AM

pre cleaner
surge protector,booster cable

fasdfd| 10.10.09 @ 10:14AM

power strip,adapter
saa socket,extersion cord

bnvbn| 10.28.09 @ 3:12AM

AVI Converter,
FLV to AVI Converter,

jghjgh| 11.16.09 @ 12:52AM

M2TS Video Converter,
M2TS Video Converter

ghfgh| 11.17.09 @ 10:30PM

iPod Touch Converter for Mac,
DVD to iPod Touch Converter for Mac

Supra| 11.19.09 @ 2:02AM

Video Cutter|iTouch Converter for Mac

hedrh| 12.7.09 @ 3:11AM

swf to wmv converter is the best swf to wmv conversion tool.

gfhgf| 12.29.09 @ 3:49AM

iPod to Mac Transfer,
iPod to Mac Transfer

bvcn| 1.19.10 @ 2:52AM

Convert to MKV is a powerful MKV video converter and MKV file converter, that can help you convert videos to MKV files with fast speed and excellent output quality.
Convert MKV to DVD as well as all the other popular formats are supported; batch and multithreading convert MKV to DVD and make the most of your multi-core processor power; create MKV to DVD with menu templates, split your movies into chapters and watch them on your home DVD player afterwards;
convert MKV to DVD by deleting unwanted parts, split and join video files and much more...

bmgf| 1.21.10 @ 1:09AM

Convert DVD to iPod,
MOD Video Converter Mac

dfhsh| 2.2.10 @ 9:53PM

M4A to MP3 Converter,
M4A to MP3 Converter for Mac,

nbvcn| 2.21.10 @ 8:55PM

Tod Converter

sg| 2.21.10 @ 9:42PM

CDG Converter

kjjkj| 2.25.10 @ 1:21AM

DVD PAL to NTSC,
PAL DVD to NTSC

ink free shipping| 3.23.10 @ 1:29AM

The Obama didn't get out much while palling around with the Chicago mob.

top web hosting plans| 3.23.10 @ 1:30AM

Good news

alexx| 10.25.10 @ 3:38PM

+1 gooD

TV.Black.Friday.2010| 11.9.10 @ 4:38PM

Obama you are my best PResident

55 inch lcd| 12.4.10 @ 9:15PM

Nice post, It's useful informations

Elder Scrolls Skyrim| 3.23.11 @ 5:30AM

Good information here. Politics can get so complicated.

artestvon| 4.12.11 @ 9:26PM

Since the bargain NFL Jerseys on auction are bogus by Reebok, the Reebok agent is abstract on anniversary sleeve. All these capacity ensure that the authentic jerseys you shop for is accurate and accustomed by the NFL, and their shirt manufacturers, Reebok. The cheapest nfl jerseys are so simple and cool, are not you attracted?Now ladies even nfl kids jerseys do not accept to cede appearance to appearance their aggregation spirit on bold canicule cutting these abundant fashionable jerseys. With women admeasurement cut, some of them affection cobweb cap sleeves and rhinestone accents on the V-neck. Accurate nfl replica jerseys is additionally actual affluent .These youth NFL jerseys appear in several models. Moreover, due to acute acceptance of football as a action in the world, the appeal of football jerseys has additionally added manifolds.With the development of the technology, aggregate becomes added calmly and the apple becomes smaller.Jerseys including NBA jerseys or NHL jerseys is that they are abundantly abiding and adamantine wearing. Unlike added avant-garde accoutrement they do not achromatize or become threadbare afterwards aloof a few months of wear.

The Chief Spokesman with authentic NFL jerseys represented all players. And he said that NFL did not carefully ability the fresh CBA with the NFLPA. George wore customized nfl jerseys and said in a teleconference on Monday, “I acquainted that we would about carefully ability a CBA but absolutely we would not.” The Labor Negotiation bankrupt bottomward on Friday. The NFLPA disassembled. The players filed the NFL on federal court. But the administration compulsively chock-full the players’ activities because of nfl football jerseys . The quarterback of Fresh Orleans Saints Drew Brees claimed that the administration of NFL did not action final angle on Friday “Completely do it for a show. They did not intend to ability an acceding indeed.” The focus of the altercation from both abandon was how abundant the administration of Wholesale NFL Jerseys should booty abroad afore the players breach the money.

cheap soccer cleats| 5.16.11 @ 12:17AM

deedt| 7.10.11 @ 9:02AM

Sorry for the huge review, but I'm really loving the new Zune, and hope this, as well as the excellent reviews some other people have written, will help you decide if it's the right choice for you.recycling technology

make health and wealth