Can we talk judgment?
In spite of a warning from his Republican predecessor, one of
Senator Joseph Biden's first acts as the new chairman of the
Senate Judiciary Committee in 1987 was to abolish the Committee's
Subcommittee on Security and Terrorism. Biden's action came just
as one of the most famous spies in American history had begun
leaking secrets to the Soviet Union. The spy -- Soviet CIA mole
Aldrich Ames -- went undiscovered for nine years, almost the
entire period of Biden's chairmanship of the Committee. Biden
relinquished his post after Republicans re-captured the Senate in
1994. Ames was finally arrested that year.
The Subcommittee had been established by the GOP's South Carolina
Senator Strom Thurmond within a month of the Republican takeover
of the Senate in the 1980 Reagan landslide. The election brought
12 new Republicans to the upper chamber, handing control of the
Senate to the GOP for the first time in 26 years.
On December 14, 1980, the New York Times featured
Thurmond in an article spotlighting his new role as the incoming
chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Saying that Thurmond
was "ready to take the offensive" after the GOP's decades in the
minority, the very first major change the Times cited
was Thurmond's decision to move on national security issues.
"Just created," wrote concerned Timesman Tom Wicker, "is
a subcommittee on 'Security and Terrorism' which has the obvious
possibility of reincarnating the old Communist-hunting Internal
Security subcommittee. Chairing it will be the ex-admiral, ex-POW
and new Senator from Alabama Jeremiah Denton…"
In a statement Thurmond brushed aside liberal concerns that the
subcommittee would somehow bring Joe McCarthy back to life,
warning "that if we don't know who the enemies of this country
are then we're in real trouble." An aide to Denton, the ex-POW
who had been held captive in North Vietnam along with John
McCain, said that Denton "wants to get a better handle on the
matter. He wants to talk to the FBI about what it sees as
security dangers." As an added insult to liberals, Thurmond
abolished a liberal favorite, or as Wicker described it, the
"important Subcommittee on Anti-Trust and Monopoly." This jewel
had been headed by Ohio's liberal Democrat Howard Metzenbaum and
was scheduled to be run by a GOP liberal, Maryland's Charles
Mathias. Thurmond, exercising his new power, simply abolished the
subcommittee targeted at capitalists and replaced it with the new
Security and Terrorism Subcommittee that would investigate
Communists. This meant that the staff, research and investigative
resources of the Senate Judiciary Committee could now be directed
at various perceived threats to U.S. national security -- such as
Soviet penetration of U.S. intelligence agencies.
Over the next six years Denton held 35 hearings of the
subcommittee, to the disparagement of liberals even as Reagan was
doing furious battle with the Soviets. By 1986, when Democrats
gained control of the Senate once again, thus replacing Thurmond
with Biden (and defeating Denton for re-election), the pressure
was on for Biden to abolish Security and Terrorism. On February
5, 1987, the Washington Post derided the subcommittee as
nothing more than a "platform" for the now defeated Denton "to
spread his view that communist conspiracies lurked everywhere."
In particular, the Post mocked Denton and Thurmond for
holding hearings on Communist intelligence gathering inside the
United States. It took special note of Biden's action this way:
"Now, six years later [after Thurmond's creation of the
subcommittee], Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D-Del) is at the helm of
the Judiciary Committee and the security and terrorism panel has
vanished." In its place, Biden resurrected Metzenbaum's old
anti-trust subcommittee and restored the Ohioan as chairman.
WHILE ALL THIS was going on, over in the Central Intelligence
Agency the life of a career employee in the CIA's Europe
Division/Counterintelligence branch was beginning to fall apart.
Aldrich Ames had a bad marriage, was binge drinking and had begun
an affair with Rosario Dupuy, an employee of the Colombian
Embassy in Mexico. Ames divorced his wife and married Rosario,
who had an expensive love of the good life. Soon enough Ames was
in deep financial trouble and began spying for the Soviet Union
in return for cash.
Meanwhile, the Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on Security and
Terrorism, mocked for its concerns about Soviet spying inside the
U.S., had, as the Post aptly described it at the time,
"vanished" at the specific direction of Biden. Thurmond's warning
that the Subcommittee was needed because "if we don't know who
the enemies of this country are then we're in real trouble" went
unheeded.
The end of this saga is picked up by no less than former
President Bill Clinton, who wrote of the Ames affair in his
memoirs. Describing his activities in 1994, the seventh year of
Biden's chairmanship of the Judiciary Committee without the much
maligned Security and Terrorism Subcommittee, Clinton
writes:
"We also got a shock when the FBI arrested thirty-one year
veteran CIA agent Aldrich Ames and his wife, breaking one of the
biggest espionage cases in American history. For nine years, Ames
had made a fortune giving up information that led to the deaths
of more than ten of our sources inside Russia, and had done
severe damage to our intelligence capability."
Seven of these "nine years" came after Biden had deliberately
ignored Thurmond's warning about the importance of the Security
and Terrorism Subcommittee. By the time Ames was doing serious
damage to U.S. national security -- in addition to causing the
murder of the ten sources cited by Clinton, Ames betrayed at
least 100 American intelligence operations -- Biden had long
since shut down precisely the tool Thurmond intended to discover
spies like Ames.
BIDEN MAKES MUCH of his "experience" these days in the area of
foreign policy. His critics frequently point out that length of
service is no compensation for good judgment, as Biden has been
on the wrong side of every significant national security issue
from Reagan's Strategic Defense Initiative to the nuclear freeze
to the first Gulf War to, most recently, his insistent opposition
to the surge in Iraq, the latter now credited with turning the
tide to victory.
What is never mentioned is that when Joe Biden took over the
chairmanship of the Senate Judiciary Committee he abolished --
against the specific advice of Strom Thurmond -- the one tool the
Judiciary Committee had at its disposal designed to investigate
Communist infiltration of American intelligence. A tool designed
to discover national security threats exactly like Aldrich
Ames.
Not for nothing did Bill Clinton later say that he was "shocked"
at the discovery of Ames' existence. With Joe Biden deliberately
blinding an investigative arm of the U.S. Senate to the
possibility, to the applause of liberals, what else did Clinton
expect?
Michael Roush| 10.28.08 @ 11:01AM
But, lets return to our discussion about how the Bush administration ignored many warnings about terrorism before 9/11
James Koerner| 10.28.08 @ 11:15AM
Michael Roush, how about remembering President Clinton not allowing the CIA to take out Osama Bin Laden not once, not twice, but three separate times while he was in office and the Sudan even offered Bin Laden on a silver plater to him.
Howard| 10.28.08 @ 11:31AM
I enjoy the theme, but I doubt if Joe Biden could find a pubic hair in a whore house. More importantly, was Clinton axing the CIA & FBI, and having Janet Reno managing the store.
Michael Roush| 10.28.08 @ 11:37AM
James, Ok, but let us not forget Tora Bora.
Howard, Could Larry Craig find one in a men's restroom? And , what about Alberto Gonzalez managing the store. Best DWI case ole Al ever took.
silvie pearl| 10.28.08 @ 12:25PM
Biden: hiding in plain sight. Obama: hiding in plain sight. I think this will be a cold winter with more to come if these guys occupy washington.
Philoktetes| 10.28.08 @ 1:24PM
I am sure that the subcommitte on Security and Terrorism was important as a political tool to expose our enemies and be a moral support for our intelligence branches, however, aren't agents for foreign countries found by counter-intelligence, either the FBI or internally by CIA? How could Thurman have discoverd Ames? Just asking.
WVWisdom| 10.28.08 @ 2:12PM
Philoctetes, you’re spot on. Anyone with counterintelligence (CI) experience or knowledge knows that a Senate subcommittee can’t prevent or discover espionage. Nor can it deal with how the FBI and CIA deal with that threat. At the time of the Ames case, there was a debate going on throughout the intelligence community over how many resources and what priority to give to CI, and what techniques to use. Senators could have gotten involved in that debate through the Intelligence Committee, particularly during discussions of CI budgets and special budget requests. The subcommittee, however, was set up not to help solve CI problems, but rather to help certain members get reelected by claiming to be concerned about security matters.
Public involvement by politicians in these issues is almost always counterproductive. The politicians invariably try only to advance their own standing by pontificating after a security breach. They understandably avoid the tough questions, such as how there is always a downside to any increased security measure – anything from adding a barrier outside an Embassy to waterboarding a suspect.
Joe Biden is a despicable, congenitally dishonest person who doesn’t deserve to be elected to any office. But when he abolished a counterproductive subcommittee he was performing a small public service.
Marc Jeric| 10.28.08 @ 2:41PM
Joe Biden is a bloviating gasbag with an IQ close to a functional moron. Congressional committees serve only the political interests of its members - no useful function! Except perhaps the McCarthy's Anti-Communist Committee which discovered hundreds of Soviet spies in the State Department.
Larry| 10.28.08 @ 6:24PM
Joe Biden is a plagiarist and cannot tell the truth. He lied at least 14 times during the debate with Vice President nominee Sarah Palin. The most obvious one is how “after the US, and the French, kicked Hezbollah out of Lebanon” and how he and Barack Obama predicted the vacuum and how NATO should go in to fill the vacuum. The US, and the French, never kicked anyone out of Lebanon. So what he and Obama discussed never could have happened. Biden lied to make the point that they had the foresight and the right foreign policy for America. But, why did he lie about it? It is for the very simple reason that there is no fact that would support Obama or Biden had ever made the right foreign policy for the country. Telling the truth to the American people is above their pay grade.
mnotaro| 10.28.08 @ 10:05PM
Joe Biden is a joke of a politician with a slimy fake smile and the liberal left wing illuminati are eating it up!
Diane Smith| 10.29.08 @ 1:34AM
The electorate has demonstrated over the years that it does not care about the ability of its elected officials - only the electability.
Airlines have higher standards for cabin cleaners. And certainly they would not allow a pilot with a history of brain aneurysms to fly a fully boarded 767 across country. And yet we tolerate, even re-elect that doddering old Robert Byrd, who at 90+ is third in line for the presidency! If Ted Kennedy were an airline pilot (that takes some imagining - he would sure fill a cockpit) and had just had brain surgery for cancer, the FAA or his company would not return him to flying status. But it is OK to allow him a vote in the Senate, to sit on committees, etc. , affecting decisions that will have an impact on an entire nation. Well, maybe his judgment is as OK as it ever was, but you can't feel really top notch if you have just had your skull cracked open and the interior re-arranged. I forget the minor player a year or so back that suffered seizures, a stroke and other set backs related to brain function - and he is still a senator. Dems kept the seat warm for him - and presumably his salary still rolled in even as he lay speechless in a hospital bed.
So why are we concerned that we may be abaout to get a crack-brain incubating his third aneurysm as our next VP? I don't recall a discouraging word being uttered about his Biden's health condition.
Ms. Know| 10.30.08 @ 12:52AM
All he does is run his mouth, and says whatever he feels like saying. Then the mainstream media illuminati give him all the passes, and no one is afraid of what this guy might do or say next? I sure am.
Freedom Fighter| 10.30.08 @ 5:21AM
re: Michael Roush (10/28/08 10:37AM)
"... but let us not forget Tora Bora."
Yeah, let's talk about Tora Bora. Under President "Slick" we treated the '93 bombing of the WTC as a crime, and thus there was a trial. In that trial there was ther normal "discovery" routine. It was in the course of this that Obama learned that the CIA was trailing certain al Qa'ida members by their cell phones.
Fast-forward ten years and ObL is trapped like a rat in a cave in Afghanistan. Remembering the cell phone trick, he sent a few lackeys off in one direction with his cell phone, which we followed, waited a bit and then made his get-away in the opposite direction into Pakistan.
So, what have we all learned here?