The American Spectator

home
ADVERTISEMENT
Print Email
Text Size

Special Report

Punishing the Persecuted

A twisted interpretation of U.S. law has turned thousands of victims of global oppression, who sympathize with America, into terrorists ineligible for asylum.

The United States is mired in a bitter conflict in Iraq while facing an increasingly hostile world. It is unclear if the U.S. government has ever been less popular, even among traditional allies.

Yet America does have friends abroad. People who still view the U.S. as a beacon of liberty and opportunity. People who so love this nation that they want to live here and become citizens.

But they can't. Because they fought with America against America's enemies.

Strange? Yes, but nevertheless true. There are thousands, indeed tens of thousands, of people around the globe, victims of horrid oppression who have fought for their own liberation, sometimes alongside U.S. forces, who today are considered to be terrorists or supporters of terrorists, and thus cannot settle in America.

Welcome to Washington, D.C., and the Kafkaesque world of the PATRIOT and Real ID Acts, as interpreted by the federal bureaucracy.

IT HAS LONG BEEN EVIDENT that Uncle Sam lives in a bubble, largely isolated from reality. Nonsensical decisions are not just common; they are to be expected. Three years ago, for instance, the Board of Immigration Appeals rejected an asylum claim by a Chinese Christian who had been arrested, beaten, tortured, and humiliated. The reason: he violated the Chinese government's "legitimate" restrictions on religious activity. Under pressure the Bush administration vacated the decision. Just another day in Washington.

The events of September 11 made evident to all the importance of monitoring those who enter America. Congress enacted in haste a bill drafted in haste by the Bush administration. Refugee status was to be denied to anyone who provided "material support" for "terrorists." Alas, people in Washington write and interpret the law very differently than would normal people.

First, terrorist groups include anyone who opposes a legally recognized government. That is, under current U.S. law any French or Spanish citizens who aided the American Revolution would be barred from coming to America. None of them are still alive, of course, which thankfully spares us yet another embarrassment.

But many Hmong and Montagnards are still alive, and they now cannot settle in the U.S. because they fought with America against the Communist governments of Laos and Vietnam. Similarly situated are Cubans who have opposed the Castro regime, under sanction by the U.S. government for nearly five decades; Afghans who fought the Taliban, defenestrated with U.S. support; and Iraqis who resisted the very government which America ousted militarily. Indeed, Michael Horowitz of the Hudson Institute points out that the law bars entry to any Jew who was living in the Warsaw Ghetto and who fought the Nazis while U.S. forces were battling the Wehrmacht.

Under a similar interdict are members of the ethnic groups Chin, Karen, and Karenni, which have spent the last half century battling against Burma's central government. The U.S. currently imposes sanctions against the odious military regime in Rangoon, but anyone who takes up arms, or helps those who take up arms, against the junta is considered to be an anti-American terrorist.

Second, "material support" includes incidental aid to individuals as well as help provided under duress. It doesn't matter if you exhibit a moment of minor kindness to a soldier passing by or have been kidnapped and forced to work: if you "assist" terrorists, you become a terrorist equivalent yourself.

p>It's estimated that 10,000 people were denied entry last year because of these provisions. The following are just a few people rejected as refugees (or previously accepted as refugees but now denied green cards for work) because they were found to provide material aid to terrorists: br> /p> blockquote>
Page: 1 2 3  

topics:
Law, Military, Iraq, Immigration

About the Author

Doug Bandow is a Senior Fellow at the Cato Institute and the Senior Fellow in International Religious Persecution at the Institute on Religion and Public Policy. A former Special Assistant to President Ronald Reagan, he is author of Beyond Good Intentions: A Biblical View of Politics (Crossway).

Letter to the Editor Leave a comment

Leave a Comment

N.B. We encourage readers to share and discuss their thoughtful and relevant comments about this Spectator article. Comments are routinely monitored and will be deleted if profane, bigoted, or grossly impolite. Please be respectful. (And don't feed the trolls!) Thank you.

Related Articles

More Articles by Doug Bandow

More Articles From Special Report

http://spectator.org/archives/2007/02/12/punishing-the-persecuted
ADVERTISEMENT

Clip of the Day

Most Popular Articles

Who Castrated Ann Coulter?

David Catron | 2.6.12

Bigoted Barack, Red in Tooth and Clause

George Neumayr | 2.10.12

Unsafe at Any Smoke

Eric Peters | 2.10.12

Access This

Ross Kaminsky | 2.10.12

The Delousing of a Movement

R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. | 2.9.12

Justice Ginsburg Should Resign

William Tucker | 2.8.12

The Show Me State's No Show Primary

Andrew B. Wilson | 2.10.12

No Double Play

Peter Hannaford | 2.10.12

ADVERTISEMENT