Women are not paid less than men when you consider time off for childbearing and rearing, but let’s pretend they are for the sake of argument. Kristen Bell talks about the “cheaper workforce here in the good old U.S. of A. –women.”
Okay, then. If what she’s saying is true, wouldn’t companies clamor for workers that cost over 25% less and produce more here in the U.S.? A 25% salary savings would have offices filled with women. Men would be discriminated against because of the obvious advantage, but that’s not the case.
Either corporations are the greediest, bottom-line-only entities on the planet or they’re so sexist, they’d sacrifice the bottom line because they like men better and are willing to pay a premium for them.
Melissa Mackenzie is Publisher of The American Spectator. Melissa commentates for the BBC and has appeared on Fox. Her work has been featured at The Guardian, PJ Media, and was a front page contributor to RedState.Melissa commutes from Houston, Texas to Alexandria, VA. She lives in Houston with her two sons, one daughter, and two diva rescue cats.You can follow Ms. Mackenzie on Twitter: @MelissaTweets.
