In response to some of his GOP opponents criticisms that his 9-9-9 tax plan would penalize the poor, Herman Cain has included a provision for his plan that would eliminate the income tax component of the plan for those at or below the poverty level. In other words, for low-income people the plan is a 9-0-9 plan.
Although the 9-9-9/9-0-9 is an improvement over the original 9-9-9, there are a few remaining problems. Phil Klein notes that cutting income taxes for poor folks means a loss of revenue (meaning that rates will likely have to rise to raise the revenue Cain wants) and a loss of simplicity, which was the 9-9-9’s key selling point.
Those are just details, though. For the campaign trail, the larger issue might be that its effects on the poor were only one problem with the 9-9-9 plan. There are many more that Cain hasn’t addressed. Now that he’s addressed one objection, Cain may have committed himself to spending a lot of time revising and defending his plan, when he could be better served focusing on other campaign issues.
Update: See Quin Hillyer’s response.
Notice to Readers: The American Spectator and Spectator World are marks used by independent publishing companies that are not affiliated in any way. If you are looking for The Spectator World please click on the following link: https://spectatorworld.com/.