Mitt Romney’s outline for lowering deficits includes an assumption that the U.S. economy will grow at 4 percent annually. Tim Pawlenty was questioned for making a similar promise in his economic plan, and rightly so. Although 4 percent GDP growth, especially in the wake of a recession, should be attainable, there’s nothing to be gained by assuming that it will happen. For Romney to use a 4 percent growth baseline in planning to lower deficits is a perversion of “plan for the worst, hope for the best.”
So I’m not persuaded by arguments like Jim Pethokoukis‘s:
Romney said his policies would help U.S. growth accelerate to 4 percent annually. Gutsy. Recall how Tim Pawlenty was mocked mercilessly for setting a 5 percent growth target. Overall, U.S. GDP growth has averaged 3.3 percent the past 50 years. But many economists think aging America will need to settle for growth closer to 2 percent long term. Romney, however, seems to agree with consultant McKinsey that a higher retirement age and smarter immigration policy, along with smarter regulation and pro-investment tax policy, could allow the United States to maintain its historic growth rate, if not higher. More importantly, the target represents a rejection of the declinist mentality.
Promise all the growth you want. Just prepare for a lingering recession when you’re figuring out how much spending needs to be cut.
Notice to Readers: The American Spectator and Spectator World are marks used by independent publishing companies that are not affiliated in any way. If you are looking for The Spectator World please click on the following link: https://spectatorworld.com/.