Over the years, Jeff Bezos has undergone a rather striking evolution — physically, mentally, and culturally. Once a pale, nerdy book salesman, he has transformed into “Buff Bezos,” a figure emblematic of discipline and reinvention. Today, his biceps are as talked about as his business acumen. The 61-year-old’s journey from tech mogul to cultural power player is hard to ignore. As Amazon ditches its DEI baggage for a no-nonsense approach, some (mostly me) are calling him “Based Bezos” — a billionaire reshaping his image in an era where appeasement is out, and backbone is back in.
Now, Bezos appears to have set his sights on something far more terrestrial yet culturally monumental: saving James Bond. With Amazon’s acquisition of MGM — and, by extension, the 007 franchise — he has thrown his hat into the cinematic ring. His recent social media post, casually asking, “Who’d you pick as the next Bond?” might seem like simple clickbait. But a less cynical observer might call it a calculated move to shape the future of one of cinema’s most iconic — and increasingly faltering — franchises.
Once synonymous with sophistication, danger, and a dash of debonair arrogance, James Bond has, for decades, been the embodiment of a certain kind of masculine ideal. Created by Ian Fleming in the 1950s, Bond was envisioned as a cold, efficient killer with a taste for fine suits, fast cars, and even faster women — a man whose charm was matched only by his lethal skillset.
Throughout the decades, Bond evolved, reflecting the times without surrendering the core ingredients that defined him. Sean Connery’s Bond was cool and commanding, Roger Moore’s iteration brought a touch of humor and old-school British camp, and Timothy Dalton returned the character to Fleming’s grittier roots. Pierce Brosnan’s era balanced suaveness with blockbuster appeal, catering to ‘90s audiences craving both sharp wit and relentless action — a Bond with a dash of John McClane. Brosnan’s character was the perfect hybrid: refined enough to sip a martini in a tuxedo, yet unafraid to dive into explosive set pieces that felt ripped from Die Hard. GoldenEye and Die Another Day mirrored the 1990s craving for adrenaline-pumped audacity.
Despite these shifts, Bond remained Bond: unapologetically masculine, resourceful, and, above all, a man who lived by his own code.
That consistency, however, began to fade in the 21st century. Daniel Craig’s Bond was introduced as a bruised, vulnerable anti-hero. This was a conscious departure from the smooth-talking playboy of old. Casino Royale was, in many ways, a breath of fresh air. It stripped away the gadgetry and double entendres for a rawer, more real Bond.
Yet, as Craig’s tenure stretched on, the series grappled with shifting cultural winds. By the time No Time to Die arrived, Bond had gone from being the hunter to being hunted — by critics, cultural critics, and even elements within his own narrative. The film was rightly criticized by loyal fans for yielding to a post-MeToo landscape that viewed traditional masculinity with suspicion, even disdain. (RELATED: Real Men and Women: The Key to a Cultural Renaissance)
In short, Bond became a canvas for neo-feminist narratives, where strong female characters were elevated not alongside him, but often at his expense. His once defining traits — confidence, charm, assertiveness — were recast as relics of a bygone, patriarchal era. Craig’s swan song wasn’t just an ending; it was, for many longtime viewers, a funeral for the character they once knew and loved so dearly. (RELATED: Is the New York Times Shaking Off Woke?)
This brings us back to Bezos, a man whose ambitions extend from Earth’s orbit to the inner sanctums of Hollywood. The American now holds the keys to reviving — or further eroding — one of cinema’s most iconic legacies. Although Bezos is no stranger to disruption (he transformed retail, publishing, and cloud computing), breathing life back into Bond requires more than algorithms and global logistics. It demands an understanding of what made the character endure for over six decades: timeless machismo tempered with just enough modernity to evolve without selling out.
Amazon’s vast resources could revive Bond. The company could deliver high production values, global reach, and restored cinematic gravitas. Or, of course, it could go the other way. One can easily imagine Bond being reduced to a data-driven parody, scrubbed clean by focus groups and predictive algorithms. Out with the Aston Martin, in with a carbon-neutral hatchback.
Bezos’s customer-obsessed model works wonders in e-commerce, But cinema isn’t a shopping cart; it’s storytelling. Chasing viral approval and demographic quotas risks flattening Bond into an algorithm-approved avatar: inoffensive, sanitized, and utterly forgettable. (RELATED: As Hollywoke Crumbles)
Casting the next Bond isn’t just about replacing Craig; it’s about resetting the franchise’s cultural compass.
Long the fan favorite, Henry Cavill is the clear choice. Rugged and charming, he exudes both strength and sophistication. Cavill embodies the archetype that audiences crave. He’s a man’s man, refined yet unapologetically and unmistakably masculine. He also happens to be an exceptionally talented actor. Hopefully, we’ve moved beyond the race-obsessed casting debates and can acknowledge reality. Henry Cavill perfectly captures the Bond that Fleming envisioned. Let’s hope Bezos sees it, too. Let’s hope he keeps Amazon true to Bond’s core — not the lunatics who’ve long run the Hollywood asylum.
READ MORE from John Mac Ghlionn:
Trump Closed the Door on Cheap Chinese Imports. Temu Found an Open Window.
The (Inconvenient) Truth About the War in Ukraine
What All Americans Can Learn from Ellen DeGeneres’s Disastrous Escape to Europe
