Are Senators who vote for the Warner anti-surge resolution taking any political risk, or are they just protecting themselves against anti-war sentiment? …
After reading Senator Warner’s resolution, I’m reinforced in my suspicion that the bet-hedging scenario is a plausible description of what’s really going on… I can think of at least seven “outs” a Senator who votes for Warner’s resolution could try to use if the surge is ultimately judged beneficial
(Scroll down to “Cynic’s Score Card: 7 Outs and Counting”)
