Many of us wondered in 2008 how the public could vote for Barack Obama based on the simple, vague slogan, “Hope and Change.” Now we are equally perplexed at the one-third of the GOP voters who are buying into Donald Trump’s “Make America Great Again” slogan. I’ve come to the conclusion that the public likes fill-in-the-blanks candidates; they flock to someone who promises that they will make things happen. They don’t stop to ask what will be changed or how will greatness be achieved. The public then molds that vague promise — fills-in-the-blanks — into whatever shape they (as individuals) need for it to take.
A candidate who sounds confident and strong while offering up big-sounding promises captured in colorful soundbites (instead of boring policy) captures the fancy of both the media and the public. Simple rhetoric from a carefully staged rally is easier for today’s media-conditioned public to grasp than thinking through and weighing the arguments logically, rationally, and realistically. Projecting our own images onto someone’s slogan is easier than evaluating what the candidate is saying or the possibility of a candidate actually achieving the promised change.
A video is making the rounds on Facebook with a political science student conducting on-campus “man on the street” interviews asking fellow students questions about historical and contemporary facts. The ignorance is not just astounding, it is positively painful to see. Then, the interviewer asks the students contemporary pop culture questions and every student — as best we can tell from the film clip — answers correctly. Given our celebrity-fixated culture and the state of today’s education, dominated as it is by political correctness and progressive ideology, should anyone be surprised that the average college student can tell you the names both of Brad Pitt’s current and his previous wife but doesn’t know who won the Civil War?
The latest Oscar ceremony had the lowest viewership in eight years, but that was still an audience of 37.3 million viewers. In contrast, the latest television debate of the GOP candidates had 13.5 million viewers, down from a record-setting 24 million back in August of 2015. Obviously, the American public is far more interested in seeing Hollywood glamour than in listening to and evaluating the various presidential candidates as they debate policy issues.
We are reaping a predictable, inevitable whirlwind from disastrous disintegration from within and destructive attacks from the outside.
These are, of course, questions that answer themselves. But though they need no answers, they do point us to the predicament we face having bought into the lies of progressivism that the old ways and traditional moral principles can be set aside and replaced with whatever whim of the moment seems desirable.
Eve was certainly not the last to throw away Paradise for what seemed on the surface to offer gratification of some trivial desire.
Notice to Readers: The American Spectator and Spectator World are marks used by independent publishing companies that are not affiliated in any way. If you are looking for The Spectator World please click on the following link: https://thespectator.com/world.